A pilot study of eye movement during mammography interpretation: Eyetracker results and workstation design implications

Journal of Digital Imaging

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 14-20

  Beard, David V ^b   Bream, Peter ^b   Pisano, Etta D ^b   Conroy, Pat ^b   Eugene Johnston, R ^a   Braeuning, Patricia ^b   McLelland, Robert ^b   Clark, Richard ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Digital mammography; Eyetracking; Image display

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER TERMINAL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; STANDARD;

ADULT; AGED; COMPUTER TERMINALS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS;

COMPUTER MONITORS; COMPUTER WORKSTATIONS; EYE MOVEMENTS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; OPTICAL RESOLVING POWER; PERSONNEL; RADIOLOGY;

DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; EYE TRACKING; IMAGE DISPLAY; INTERPRETATION LOGISTICS;

DIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHY;

EID: 0031060826     PISSN: 08971889     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03168545     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, et al: Ten to fourteen year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. JNCI 69:349-355, 1982
2. Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Duffy SW, et al: The Swedish two county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: Recent results and calculation of benefit. J Epid Com Health 43:107-114, 1989
3. Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, et al (eds): Periodic Screening for Breast Cancer. Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins, 1988
4. Baker LH: Breast cancer detection demonstration project: Five-year summary report. CA 32:194-225, 1982
5. Saltzstein SL: Potential limits of physical examination and breast self-examination in detecting small cancers of the breast: An unselected opoulation-based study of 1302 cases. Cancer 54:1443-1446, 1984
6. Fletcher SW, O'Malley MS, Bunce LA: Physicians abilities to detect lumps in silicone breast models. JAMA 253:2224-2228, 1985
7. Fisher B, Slack NH, Brass ID. Cancer of the breast: Size of neoplasm and prognosis. Cancer 24:1071, 1969
8. Wanebo HJ, Huvos AG, Urban JA: Treatment of minimal breast cancer. Cancer 33:349, 1974
9. Gallager HS, Martin JE: An orientation to the concept of minimal breast cancer. Cancer 28:1505, 1971
10. Frazier TG, Copeland EM, Gallager HS, et al: Prognosis and treatment in minimal breast cancer. Am J Surg 133:697-701, 1977
11. Kimme-Smith C, Basselt LW, Gold RH, et al: New mammography screen/film combinations: Imaging characteristics and radiation dose. AJR 154:713-719, 1990
12. Haus AG: Technologic improvements in screen-film mammography. Radiology 174:628-637, 1990.
13. Stomper PC, Gelman RS: Mammography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Hematol Oncol Clinics North Am 3:611-640, 1989
14. Mammography Quality Control Manual (revised ed). Reston, VA, American College of Radiology, 1994
15. Shtern F: Digital mammography and related technologies: A perspective from the National Cancer Institute. Radiology 183:629-630, 1992
16. Maidment ADA, Yaffe MJ: Scanned-slot Digital Mammography. SPIE 1231:316-326, 1990
17. Beard DV, Johnston RE, Pisano E, et al: An electronic lightbox for mammography: Preliminary observations, eyetracker studies, and design. SPIE Medical Imaging V 1446:289-296, 1991
18. Oestmann JW, Kopans D, Hall DA, et al: Comparison of digitized storage phosphors and conventional mammography in the detection of malignant microcalcifications. Invest Radiol 23:725-728, 1988