Blood pressure measuring devices: Recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension

British Medical Journal

Volumn 322, Issue 7285, 2001, Pages 531-536

  O'Brien, E ^a   Waeber, B ^b   Parati, G ^c   Staessen, J ^d   Myers, M G ^e  

^a BEAUMONT HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

^b LAUSANNE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^e SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBULATORY MONITORING; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HYPERTENSION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SELF EXAMINATION; SPHYGMOMANOMETER; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0035799041     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7285.531     Document Type: Review

References (83)

1. The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices
2. Formation of the Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension
3. British hypertension protocol: Evaluation of automated and semi-automated blood pressure measuring devices with special reference to ambulatory systems
4. A comparison of the BHS and AAMI protocols for validating blood pressure measuring devices: Can the two be reconciled?
5. State of the market: A review of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring devices
6. Automated blood pressure measurement: State of the market in 1998 and the need for an international validation protocol for blood pressure measuring devices
7. Inaccuracy of seven popular sphygmomanometers for home-measurement of blood pressure
8. Inaccuracy of the Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer
9. Mechanisms by which the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer underestimates blood pressure and produces a non-random distribution of RZ values
10. Are aneroid devices suitable replacements for mercury sphygmomanometers?
11. Sphygmomanometers in hospitals and family practice: Problems and recommendations
12. Evaluation of the Datascope Accutorr Plus according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation
13. Validation of CAS model 9010 automated blood pressure monitor: Children/adult and neonatal studies
14. Assessment of Tensionic Mod EPS 112 semi-automatic device of blood pressure measurement
15. Validation of an automated arterial tonometry monitor using Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standards
16. Short report: Accuracy of the Dinamap portable monitor, model 8100 determined by the British Hypertension Society protocol
17. Devices and validation
18. Evaluation of three devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the revised British Hypertension Society Protocol: The Omron HEM-705CP, Phillips HP5332, and Nissei DS-175
19. Accuracy of the Omron HEM 706 portable monitor for home measurement of blood pressure
20. Accuracy of an oscillometric automatic blood pressure device: The Omron HEM403C
21. Comparison of oscillometric and intra-arterial blood pressure and pulse measurement
22. Evaluation of two devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the Britsih Hypertension Society protocol: The Omron M4 and MX2
23. Validation of a self-monitoring blood pressure monitor: The Omron-HM 722C
24. Validation of two devices for self-measurement of blood pressure by elderly patients according to the revised British Hypertension Society protocol: The Omron HEM-722C and HEM-735C
25. Comparison of the Omron HEM-713C automated blood pressure monitor with a standard auscultatory method using a mercury manometer
26. Evaluation of the efficacy of the Omron HEM-737 Intellisense device for use on adults according to the recommendations of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation
27. Accuracy and 'range of uncertainity' of oscillometric blood pressure monitors around the upper arm and wrist
28. Validation of the Omron R3 blood pressure self-measuring device through simultaneous comparative invasive measurements according to protocol 58130 of the German Institute for Validation
29. Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer
30. An accurate oscillometric wrist blood pressure monitor: Validation of the Omron Rx [HEM-608]
31. Accutracker II (version 30/23) ambulatory blood pressure monitor: Clinical validationusing the British Hypertension Society and Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standards
32. Accuracy of the CH-Druck/Pressure ERKA ambulatory blood pressure measuring system determined by the British Hypertension Society protocol
33. Simultaneous and sequential same-arm measurements in the validation studies of automated blood pressure measuring devices
34. Accuracy of the Novacor DIASYS 200 determined by the British Hypertension Society Protocol
35. Clinical evaluation of the DIASYS integra blood pressure recorder
36. The accuracy and clinical performance of a new compact ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device, the ES-H 531
37. Technical and clinical evaluation of the Medilog ABP non-invasive blood pressure monitor
38. Evaluation of Meditech ABPM-04 ambulatory blood pressure measuring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol
39. Validation of the Nissei DS-240 ambulatory blood pressure measuring system as determined by the British Hypertension Society protocol
40. Evaluation of a new ambulatory blood pressure device
41. Short report: Accuracy of the Del Mar Avionics Pressurometer IV determined by the British Hypertension Society Protocol
42. Accuracy of the Profilomat ambulatory blood pressure measuring system determined by the British Hypertension Society protocol
43. Comparison of an auscultatory versus an oscillometric ambulatory blood pressure monitor in normotensive, hypertensive and preeclamptic pregnancy
44. Evaluation of the Profilomat II ambulatory blood pressure system according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation
45. Multicentre assessment of the Quiet Trak ambulatory blood pressure recorder according to the 1992 AAMI guidelines
46. Evaluation of the Tycos Quiet Trak ambulatory pressure recorder using British Hypertension Society (BHS) protocol
47. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric automated blood pressure monitors in the setting of preeclampsia
48. Validation of the Welch Allyn QuietTrak ambulatory blood pressure monitor in pregnancy
49. Clinical evaluation of the QuietTrak blood pressure recorder according to the protocol of the British Hypertension Society
50. Evaluation du moniteur de pression artérielle en ambulatoire Save 33 modèle 2
51. Evaluation of the Shiller BR-102 ambulatory blood pressure system according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation
52. Evaluation of the SpaceLabs 90202 according to the AAMI standard and BHS criteria
53. Accuracy of the SpaceLabs 90207 determined by to the British Hypertension Society Protocol
54. Accuracy of the SpaceLabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure measuring system in normotensive pregnant women determined by the British Hypertension Society Protocol
55. Validation of the Spacelabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy
56. Oscillometric blood pressure measurements in severe preeclampsia: Validation of the SpaceLabs 90207
57. Accuracy of the SpaceLabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure monitor in children and adolescents
58. Validation of the SpaceLabs 90207 automatic non-invasive blood pressure monitor in elderly subjects
59. Validation of the SpaceLabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure device for hemodialysis patients
60. Accuracy of the SpaceLabs Medical 90217 ambulatory blood pressure monitor
61. Short report: Accuracy of the Takeda TM-2420/TM-2020 determined by the British Hypertension Society protocol
62. A multicenter evaluation of the A&D TM-2420 ambulatory blood pressure recorder
63. Validation of the accuracy of the A&D TM2420 Model 7 for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and effect of microphone replacement on its performance
64. The accuracy and performance of the A&D TM 2421, a new ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device based on the cuffoscillometric method and the Korotkov sound technique
65. Validation of the Takeda 2421 ambulatory blood pressure monitor in children
66. Validation of the A&D TM-2430 device for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and evaluation of performance according to subjects' characteristics
67. Performance of the AM-5600 blood pressure monitor; comparison with ambulatory intra-arterial pressure
68. Estimation of blood pressare variability from 24 hour ambulatory finger blood pressure
69. Finapres tracking of systolic blood pressure and baroreflex sensitivity improved by waveform filtering
70. Performance review of a noninvasive blood pressure monitor
71. Accuracy of the Vita-Stat device in measuring blood pressure
72. Survey of automated noninvasive blood pressure monitors
73. Automated noninvasive blood pressure measurement
74. Accuracy of the Dinamap portable monitor, model 8100: A review of the evidence for accuracy
75. Recommendations for the use of home (self) and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
76. Use and interpretation of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: Recommendations of the British Hypertension Society
77. Canadian Hypertension Society guidelines for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
78. Proposals for simplyfing the validation protocols of the British Hypertension Society and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation