Evaluation of the efficacy of the Omron HEM-737 intellisense device for use on adults according to the recommendations of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation

Blood Pressure Monitoring

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 261-265

  Anwar, Yusra Anis ^a,b   Giacco, Sharon ^a   McCabe, Ellen J ^a   Tendler, Beatriz E ^a   White, William B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation guidelines; Blood pressure measurement; Clinical device testing; Home blood pressure; Validation of blood pressure

Indexed keywords

MERCURY;

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BODY MASS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPHYGMOMANOMETER; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

EID: 0031775127     PISSN: 13595237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Padfield PL, Stewart MJ, Gough K. The role of self-measurement of blood pressure in the management of hypertension. Blood Press Monit 1996; 1 (suppl 2):S15-S19.
2. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. American national standard for electronic or automated sphygmomanometers. Second edition. Arlington, Virginia: AAMI; 1992.
3. White WB, Berson AS, Robbins C, Jamieson M, Sheps SG, Prisant M, et al. National standard for measurement of resting and ambulatory blood pressures with automated sphygmomanometers. Hypertension 1993; 21:504-509.
4. Perloff D, Grim C, Flack J, Frolich ED, Hill M, McDonald M, et al. Human blood pressure determination by sphygmomanometry. Circulation 1993, 8:2460-2470.
5. White WB, Susser W, James GD, Marra L, McCabe EJ, Pickering TG, et al. Multicenter assessment of the QuietTrak ambulatory blood pressure recorder according to the 1992 AAMI guidelines. Am J Hypertens 1994; 7:509-514.
6. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; i:307-310.
7. Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 1995; 346:1085-1087.
8. White WB, Lund-Johansen P, McCabe EJ, Omvik P. Clinical evaluation of the Accutracker II ambulatory blood pressure monitor: assessment of performance in two countries and comparison with sphygmomanometry and intraarterial blood pressure at rest and during exercise. J Hypertens 1989; 7:967-975.
9. Gould BA, Hornung RS, Kieso HA, Altman DG, Cashman PMM, Raftery EB. Evaluation of the Remler M2000 blood pressure recorder: comparison with intraarterial blood pressure recordings both at hospital and home. Hypertension 1984; 6:209-215.
10. Vardan S, Mookherjee S, Warner R, Smulyan H. Systolic hypertension: direct and indirect measurements. Arch Intern Med 1983; 143:935-938.
11. O'Brien E, Petrie J, Littler W, de Swiet M, Padfield PL, O'Malley K, et al. The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of automated and semi-automated blood pressure measuring devices with special reference to ambulatory systems. J Hypertens 1990; 8:607-619.