Simultaneous and sequential same-arm measurements in the validation studies of automated blood pressure measuring devices

American Journal of Hypertension

Volumn 9, Issue 12 I, 1996, Pages 1228-1231

  Livi, Riccardo ^a   Teghini, Laila ^a   Cagnoni, Stefano ^a   Scarpelli, Paolo T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

Author keywords

ambulatory monitoring; blood pressure; British Hypertension Society protocol; Daypress 500; validation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, AMBULATORY; EVALUATION STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0030472082     PISSN: 08957061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-7061(96)00320-2     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation: American National Standard for Electronic or Automated Sphygmomanometers. AAMI, Washington DC, 1987.
2. O'Brien E, Petrie J, Littler W, et al: The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of automated and semi-automated blood pressure measuring devices with special reference to ambulatory systems. J Hypertens 1990;8:607-619.
3. Atkins N, Mee F, O'Malley K, et al: The relative accuracy of simultaneous same arm, simultaneous opposite arm and sequential same arm measurements in testing the accuracy of automated pressure measuring devices. J Hum Hypertens 1990;4:647-649.
4. Coats AJS, Clark SJ: British Hypertension Protocol. J Hypertens 1991;9:575-576.
5. White WB, Berson AS, Robbins C, et al: National standard for measurement of resting and ambulatory blood pressures with automated sphygmomanometers. Hypertension 1993;21:504-509.
6. O'Brien E, Petrie J, Littler WA, et al: The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices. J Hypertens 1993;11(suppl 2):S43-S62.
7. O'Brien E, Atkins N: A comparison of the British Hypertension Society and Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation protocols for validating blood pressure measuring devices: can the two be reconciled? J Hypertens 1994; 12:1089-1094.
8. Cates EM, Schlussel YR, James GD, et al: A validation study of the Spacelabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure monitor. J Amb Monitoring 1990;2:149-154.
9. Pannarale G, Bebb G, Clark S, et al: Bias and variability in blood pressure measurement with ambulatory recorders. Hypertension 1993;22:591-598.