Vertical foreclosure in experimental markets

RAND Journal of Economics

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 466-496

  Martin, Stephen ^a   Normann, Hans Theo ^a   Snyder, Christopher M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035640767     PISSN: 07416261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2696364     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. ABBINK, K. AND SADRIEH, K. "RatImage - Research Assistant Toolbox for Computer-Aided Human Behavior Experiments." Discussion Paper no. B-325, University of Bonn, 1995.
2. ALLEN, B.T. "Vertical Integration and Market Foreclosure: The Case of Cement and Concrete." Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 14 (1971), pp. 251-274.
3. BOLTON, P. AND WHINSTON, M.D. "Incomplete Contracts, Vertical Integration, and Supply Assurance." Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 60 (1993), pp. 121-148.
4. BORK, R.H. The Antitrust Paradox. New York: Basic Books, 1978.
5. CARLTON, D.W. "Vertical Integration and Market Foreclosure: Comment." Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, (1990), pp. 277-280.
6. CHIPTY, T. "Vertical Integration, Market Foreclosure, and Consumer Welfare in the Cable Television Industry." American Economic Review, Vol. 91 (2001), pp. 428-453.
7. CHOI, J.P. AND YI, S.-S. "Vertical Foreclosure with the Choice of Input Specifications." RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 31 (2000), pp. 717-743.
8. CHURCH, J. AND GANDAL, N. "Systems Competition, Vertical Merger and Foreclosure." Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Vol. 9 (2000), pp. 25-51.
9. DEGRABA, P. "Most-Favored-Customer Clauses and Multilateral Contracting: When Nondiscrimination Implies Uniformity." Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Vol. 5 (1996), pp. 565-579.
10. FORSYTHE, R., HOROWITZ, J.L., SAVIN, N.E., AND SEFTON, M. "Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments." Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 6 (1994), pp. 347-369.
11. FRANCIOSI, R., KUJAL, P., MICHELITSCH, R., SMITH, V., AND DENG, G. "Fairness: Effect on Temporary and Equilibrium Prices in Posted-Offer Markets." Economic Journal, Vol. 105 (1995), pp. 938-950.
12. FRIEDMAN, D. AND SUNDER, S. Experimental Methods - A Primer for Economists. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
13. FUDENBERG, D. AND MASKIN, E. "The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information." Econometrica, Vol. 54 (1986), pp. 533-554.
14. GOULD, J.R. "Price Discrimination and Vertical Control: A Note." Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 85 (1977), pp. 1063-1071.
15. GRIMM, C.M., WINSTON, C., AND EVANS, C.A. "Foreclosure of Railroad Markets: A Test of Chicago Leverage Theory." Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 35 (1992), pp. 295-310.
16. GÜTH, W., MARCHAND, N., AND RULLIERE, J.-L. "On the Reliability of Fairness - An Experimental Study." Discussion Paper no. 102, Humboldt University Berlin, 1997.
17. _, OCKENFELS, P., AND RITZBERGER, K. "On Durable Goods Monopolies: An Experimental Study of Intrapersonal Price Competition and Price Discrimination Over Time." Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 16 (1995), pp. 247-274.
18. _, SCHMITTBERGER, R., AND SCHWARZE, B. "An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining." Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 3 (1982), pp. 367-388.
19. HART, O. AND TIROLE, J. "Vertical Integration and Market Foreclosure." Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, (1990), pp. 205-276.
20. HOFFMAN, E., MCCABE, K., SHACHAT, K., AND SMITH, V. "Preferences, Property Rights, and Anonymity in Bargaining Experiments." Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 7 (1994), pp. 346-380.
21. KLASS, M.W. AND SALINGER, M.A. "Do New Theories of Vertical Foreclosure Provide Sound Guidance for Consent Agreements in Vertical Merger Cases?" Antitrust Bulletin, Vol. 40 (1995), pp. 667-698.
22. KLEIN, B., CRAWFORD, R.C., AND ALCHIAN, A.A. "Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process." Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 21 (1978), pp. 297-326.
23. KWOKA, J.E., JR. AND WHITE, L.J. The Antitrust Revolution, 3d ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
24. MACAULEY, S. "Noncontractual Relations in Business." American Sociological Review, Vol. 28 (1963), pp. 55-70.
25. MARTIN, S. "Strategic and Welfare Effects of Bundling." Economics Letters, Vol. 62 (1999), pp. 371-376.
26. MAS-COLELL, A., WHINSTON, M.D., AND GREEN, J.R. Microeconomic Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
27. MASON, C.F. AND PHILLIPS, O.R. "Vertical Integration and Collusive Incentives: An Experimental Analysis." International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 18 (2000), pp. 471-496.
28. MCAFEE, R.P. AND SCHWARTZ, M. "Opportunism in Multilateral Vertical Contracting: Nondiscrimination, Exclusivity, and Uniformity." American Economic Review, Vol. 84 (1994), pp. 210-230.
29. MCBRIDE, M.E. "Spatial Competition and Vertical Integration: Cement and Concrete Revisited." American Economic Review, Vol. 73 (1983), pp. 1011-1022.
30. O'BRIEN, D.P. AND SHAFFER, G. "Vertical Control with Bilateral Contracts." RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 23 (1992), pp. 299-308.
31. ORDOVER, J.A., SALONER, G., AND SALOP, S.C. "Equilibrium Vertical Foreclosure." American Economic Review, Vol. 80 (1990), pp. 127-142.
32. PASS, C.L AND HAWKINS, K.H. "Exclusive Dealing, Supplier Ownership of Outlets and the Public Interest: The Petrol Case." Antitrust Bulletin, Vol. 17 (1972), pp. 567-595.
33. PERRY, M.K. "Vertical Integration: Determinants and Effects." In R. Schmalensee and R.D. Willig, eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization. New York: North-Holland, 1989.
34. REIFFEN, D. "Equilibrium Vertical Foreclosure: Comment." American Economic Review, Vol. 82 (1992), pp. 694-697.
35. _ AND VITA, M. "Is There New Thinking on Vertical Mergers? A Comment." Antitrust Law Journal, Vol. 63 (1995), pp. 917-941.
36. REY, P. AND TIROLE, J. "A Primer on Foreclosure." In M. Armstrong and R.H. Porter, eds., Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 3. New York: North-Holland, forthcoming.
37. REYNOLDS, S.S. "Durable-Goods Monopoly: Laboratory Market and Bargaining Experiments." RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 31 (2000), pp. 375-394.
38. RIORDAN, M.H. "Anticompetitive Vertical Integration by a Dominant Firm." American Economic Review, Vol. 88 (1998), pp. 1232-1248.
39. _ AND SALOP, S.C. "Evaluating Vertical Mergers: A Post-Chicago Approach." Antitrust Law Journal, Vol. 63 (1995), pp. 513-568.
40. ROSENGREN, E.S. AND MEEHAN, J.W., JR. "Empirical Evidence on Vertical Foreclosure." Economic Inquiry, Vol. 32 (1994), pp. 303-317.
41. ROTH, A.E. "Bargaining Experiments." In J.H. Kagel and A.E. Roth, eds., The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1995.
42. SALINGER, M.A. "Vertical Mergers and Market Foreclosure." Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 103 (1988), pp. 345-356.
43. _. "The Meaning of 'Upstream' and 'Downstream' and the Implications for Modeling Vertical Mergers." Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 37 (1989), pp. 373-387.
44. SCHMALENSEE, R. "A Note on the Theory of Vertical Integration." Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81 (1973), pp. 442-449.
45. SEGAL, I. "Contracting with Externalities." Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 114 (1999), pp. 337-388.
46. SELTEN, R. AND STOECKER, R. "End Behavior in Sequences of Finite Prisoner's Dilemma Supergames: A LearningTheory Approach." Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 7 (1988), pp. 47-70.
47. SMITH, V.L. "Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science." American Economic Review, Vol. 72 (1982), pp. 923-925.
48. SNYDER, C.M. "Empirical Studies of Vertical Foreclosure." Industry Economics Conference Papers and Proceedings, University of Melbourne and Bureau of Industry Economics, Vol. 23 (1995), pp. 98-127.
49. STATACORP. Stata Statistical Software: Release 5.0. College Station, Tex.: Stata Corporation, 1997.
50. TIROLE, J. The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1988.
51. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Merger Guidelines, 1969. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1969.
52. _. Merger Guidelines, 1982. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1982.
53. _. Merger Guidelines, 1984. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984.
54. _. Horizontal Merger Guidelines, 1992. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1992.
55. VERNON, J.M. AND GRAHAM, D.A. "Profitability of Monopolization by Vertical Integration." Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 79 (1971), pp. 924-925.
56. WARREN-BOULTON, F.R. "Vertical Control with Variable Proportions." Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 82 (1974), pp. 783-802.
57. WATERMAN, D. AND WEISS, A.A. "The Effects of Vertical Integration Between Cable Television Systems and Pay Cable Networks." Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 72 (1996), pp. 357-395.
58. WHITE, H. "A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity." Econometrica, Vol. 8 (1980), pp. 817-838.
59. WHITE, L.J. "The Revolution in Antitrust Analysis of Vertical Relationships: How Did We Get from There to Here?" In R. J. Larnere and J.W. Meehan, eds., Economics and Antitrust Policy. Westpoint, Conn.: Quorum, 1989.
60. WILLIAMSON, O.E. "The Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure Considerations." American Economic Review, Vol. 61 (1971), pp. 112-123.
61. _. "Vertical Integration and Market Foreclosure: Comment." Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, (1990), pp. 280-283.