Selected debate from the arena of knowledge management: New endorsements for established organizational practices

International Journal of Management Reviews

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 101-111

  Beamish, Neal G ^a   Armistead, Colin G ^a  

^a BOURNEMOUTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035627524     PISSN: 14608545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2370.00057     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Ambrosini, V. and Bowman, C. (1998) The dilemma of tacit knowledge: tacit routines as a source of sustainable competitive advantage. Paper presented at the British Academy of Management Conference, Nottingham, September.
2. Araujo, L. (1998). Knowing and learning as networking. Management Learning, 29(3), 317-336.
3. Armistead, C.G., Beamish, N.G. and Meakins, M. (2001). Realising key issues in knowledge management: integrating organisational effectiveness. Unpublished manuscript.
4. Bair, J.H. and O'Connor, E. (1998). The state of the product in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(2), 20-27.
5. Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practise: towards a unified view of working, learning and innovating. Organization Science 2(1), 40-57.
6. Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (1998). Organizing knowledge. California Management Review, 40(3), 90-111.
7. Cohen, D. (1998). Toward a knowledge context. Report on the First Annual U.C. Berkeley Forum on Knowledge and the Firm. California Management Review, 40(3), 22-39.
8. Crane, D. (1972). Invisible Colleges. Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Cummins, A. and Oldham, G.R. (1997). Enhancing creativity: managing work contexts for the high potential employee. California Management Review, 40(1), 22-38.
10. Davenport, T.H. and Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge. How Organisations Manage What They Know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
11. Dierickx, I. and Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12), 1504-1511.
12. Foss, N.J. (1996). Knowledge-based approaches to the theory of the firm: some critical comments. Organization Science, 7, 470-476.
13. Frappaolo, C. and Capshaw, S. (1999). Knowledge management software, capturing the essence of know-how and innovation. Information Management Journal, July, 44-48.
14. Gourlay, S.N. (1999). Communities of practice: a new concept for the millennium, or the rediscovery of the wheel? In Easterby-Smith, M., Araujo, L. and Burgoyne, J. (eds), Organizational Learning, 3rd International Conference, Lancaster University, Vol. 1, pp. 479-495.
15. Granovetter, M.S. (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 6, 1360-1380.
16. Grant, R.M. (1996a). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109-122.
17. Grant, R.M. (1996b). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375-387.
18. Hansen, M.T. (1999) The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organisational subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82-111.
19. Hirshberg, J. (1998). The Creative Priority. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
20. Kanter, R. (1984). The Change Masters. London: Irwin.
21. Kempster, M. (1998). Digging for data. Inform, 12(6), 22-30.
22. Koestler, A. (1962). The Act of Creation. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
23. Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397.
24. Krajewski, S. and O'Leary, N. (1999). The Austin bunch. Adweek, 25 January, 71-73.
25. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
27. Leonard, D. and Sensiper, S. (1998). The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation. California Management Review, 40(3), 112-132.
28. Mahoney, J.T. and Pandian, J.R. (1992). The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 363-380.
29. McAleer, N. (1991). The roots of inspiration. In Henry, J. (ed.), Creative Management. London: Sage.
30. McCampbell, A.S., Clare, L.M. and Gitters, S.H. (1999). Knowledge management: the new challenge for the 21st century. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(3), 172-179.
31. Neef, D. (1999). Making the case for knowledge management, the bigger picture. Management Decision, 37(1), 72-79.
32. Neil, M. (1998). Agent technology in knowledge management. Proceedings of the First International Conference on the Practical Application of Knowledge Management, London, 23-25 March.
33. Nonaka, I. and Konno, N. (1998). The concept of 'ba': building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40-54.
34. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Nwana, H.S. (1996). Software agents: an overview. Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(3), 1-10.
36. Peteraf, M.A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-base view. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 179-191.
37. Polanyi, M.P. (1962). Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. Prakash, A. (1996). The Internet as a global strategic tool. Information Systems Management, Summer, 45-49.
39. Probst, G., Buchel, B. and Raub, S. (1998). Knowledge as a strategic resource. In von Krogh, G., Roos, J. and Kleine, D. (eds), Knowing in Finns. Understanding, Managing and Measuring Knowledge. London: Sage.
40. Rowse, M. (1999). Only connect: the role of linkage in information search and retrieval. Proceedings of the 23rd International Online Information Meeting, London, 7-9 December, 63-64.
41. Scheper, W.J. and Scheper, G.C. (1996). Autopsies on autopoiesis. Behavioral Science, 41(1), 3-12.
42. Spender, J.C. (1994). Knowing, managing and learning. a dynamic managerial epistemology. Management Learning, 25(3), 387-412.
43. Spender, J.C. (1996). Competitive advantage from tacit knowledge? Unpacking the concept and its strategic implications. In Moingeon, B. and Edmondson, A. (eds), Organisational Learning and Competitive Advantage. London: Sage.
44. Spender, J.C. (1998). Pluralist epistemology and the knowledge-based theory of the firm. Organization, 5(2), 233-256.
45. Stamps, D. (1997). Communities of practice. learning is social. training is irrelevant? Training, February, 34-42.
46. Stevens, G. (1999). Creativity + business discipline = higher profits faster from new product development. Journal of Product Innovation and Management, 16, 455-468.
47. Swanson, D.R. and Smalheiser, N.R. (1999). An interactive system for finding complementary literatures: a stimulus to scientific discovery. Artificial Intelligence, 91, 183-203.
48. Venzin, M., von Krogh, G. and Roos, J. (1998). Future research into knowledge management. In von Krogh, G., Roos, J. and Kleine, D. (eds), Knowing in Finns. Understanding, Managing and Measuring Knowledge. London: Sage.
49. Von Krugh, G. (1998). Care in knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 133-153.
50. Wenger, E.C. and Snyder, W.M. (2000). Communities of practice: the organisational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139-145.
51. West, G.P. and Meyer, G.D. (1997). Communicated knowledge as a learning foundation. International Journal of Organisational Analysis, 5(1), 25-58.
52. Whitley, E.A. (2000). Tacit and explicit knowledge: conceptual confusion around the commodification of knowledge. Proceedings of Knowledge Management: Concepts and Controversies Conference, Warwick, 10-11 February. Coventry: University of Warwick.