Finding the best users to involve in design: A rational approach

Travail Humain

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 223-245

  Reuzeau, F ^a  

^a AIRBUS   (France)

Author keywords

Data Link; Design Process; Participatory Ergonomics; Safety; User Involvement; User Model

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035597080     PISSN: 00411868     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3917/th.643.0223     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. ;Amalberti, R. (1998). Facteurs humains et industrie de haute technologie à risques : ne nous trompons pas de guerre. Communication présentée à ERGO'LA 98. Biarritz, France, November.
2. Amalberti, R. (1999). Automation in aviation: A human factors perspective. In D. J. Garland, J. A. Wise, & V. D. Hopkin (Eds.), Handbook of Aviation Human Factors (pp. 173-193). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Amalberti, R., & Deblon, F. (1992). Cognitive modelling of fighter aircarft process control: A step towards an intelligent on-board assistance system. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 36, 639-671.
4. Amalberti, R., & Valot, C. (1990). Champ de validité, pour une population de pilotes, de l'expertise de l'un d'entre eux. Le Travail Humain, 55, 313-328.
5. Axtell, C. M., Waterson, P. E., & Clegg, C. W. (1997). Problems integrating user participation into software development. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47, 323-345.
6. Bannon, L. (1986). Issues en design. Some notes. In D. A, Norman & S. W. Draper (Eds.), User centered system design (pp. 25-29). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Billings, C. E. (1997). Aviation automation: The search for a human-centered approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Bisseret, A. (1987). Les activités de conception et leur assistance. Bulletin de liaison de la recherche en informatique et en automatique, N° 115/87, 1-11.
9. Bloomberg, J. (1993). Ethnographic field methods and their relation to design. In D. Schuler & A. Namioka (Eds.), Participatory Design. Principles and Practices (pp. 79-97). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Bodker, S., & Gronbaek, K. (1996). Users and designers activity: An analysis of cooperative activities in systems design. In Y. Engeström & D. Middle ton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 130-159). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
11. Bodker., S., Gronbaek, K., & Kyung, M. (1993). Cooperative design: Techniques and experiences from the Scandinavian scene. In D. Schuler & A. Namioka (Eds.), Participatory design, principles and practices (pp. 157-176). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Bonnardel, N. (1992). Le rôle de revaluation dons les activités de conception. Thèse, Université d'Aix-en-Provence, France.
13. Boy, G. (1998). Cognitive Junction analysis. Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
14. Brown, J. S. (1986). From cognitive to social ergonomics and beyond. In D. A. Norman & D. S. Draper (Eds.), User centered system design (pp. 457-486). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Damodoran, L. (1996). User involvement in the system design process - a practical guide for users. Behaviour & Information Technology, 15, 363-377.
16. Daniellou, F., & Garrigou, A. (1993). La mise en œuvre des représentations des situations passées et des situations futures dans la participation des opérateurs à la conception. In A. Weill-Fassina, P. Rabardel, & D. Dubois (Eds.), Reprèsentations pour l'action (pp. 295-309). Toulouse: Octarès.
17. Daniellou, F., & Naël, M. (1995). Ergonomie. Paris: Techniques de l'Ingénieur.
18. De Montmollin, M. (1981). Le Taylorisme à visage humain. Paris: PUF.
19. Dillon, A., & Watson, C. (1996). User analysis in HCI - the historical lessons from individual differences research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 619-637.
20. Gamgou, A. (1992). Les apports des confrontations sociocognitivives au sein de processus de conception participatifs: U róle de r ergonomie. Thése, CN'AM, Paris.
21. Grudin, J. (1993). Obstacles to participatory design in large product development organisations. In D. Schuler & A. Namioka (Eds.), Participatory design. principles and practices (pp. 99-119). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Guindon, R. (1990). Designing the design process: Exploiting opportunistic thoughts. Human-Computer Interaction, 5, 305-344.
23. th International Conferences on Hitman-Machine Interaction and Artificial Intelligence in Aerospace. Toulouse, France, September.
24. Hernlreich, R., Meritt, A., & Sherman, P. Gregorich, S., & Wiener, E. (1993). The flight management attitude questionnaire (Technical Report No. 93-4). Washington, DC: NASA/UT/Federal Aviation Administration.
25. Hoc, J. .M., & Amalberti, R. (1995), Diagnosis: Some theoretical questions raised by applied research. Current Psychology of Cognition, 14, 73-101.
26. Hörmann, H. (2001). Cultural variation of perceptions of crew behaviours in multi-pilot aircraft. Le Travail Humain, 64, 247-268.
27. Javaux, D., & De Keyser, V. (1998). Complexité et conscience de la situation dans les glass-cockpits (Rapport de Recherche SFACT). Liège, Belgique: Université de Liège, Psychologie du Travail.
28. Kolodner, J. L. (1993). Case-based reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
29. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Boston, MA: Academic Press.
30. Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (1986). User centered system design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Noyes, J. M., Starr, A. F., & Frankish, C. R. (1996). User involvement in the early stage of the development of an aircraft warning system. Behaviour & Information Technology, 15, 67-75.
32. Poltrock, S. E. (1989). Innovation in user interface development: Obstacles and opportunities. Proceedings of CHI'89 (pp. 191-195). New York: ACM.
33. Robert, J. M., & Buratto, F. (1998). Towards a grid for integrating ergonomie requirements into cockpit interface design. Paper presented at HCI-Aero'98. Montreal, Québec, May.
34. Sarter, N. (1996). Cockpit automation. From quantity to quality, from individual pilot to multipilot agents. In R. Parasuraman & M. Mouloua (Eds.), Automation an human performances. Theory and application (pp. 267-280). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Sarter, N., & Amalberti, R. (Eds.). (2000). Cognitive engineering in the aviation domain. Hillsdale, XJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Schank, R. C. (1986). Explanation patterns: Understanding mechanically and creatively. Hillsdale, NJ: Lauwrence Erlbaum Associates,
37. Schumann, R., & Luczak, H. (1996). Participation in the design of product oriented work groups. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 17, 399-409.
38. Tenney, Y. J., Rogers, W. H., & Pew, R. W. (1998). Pilot opinions on cockpit automation issues. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8, 1-20.
39. Valor, C. (1998). Métacognition et connaissances metacogninves. Intéréts pour l'ergonomie. Thèse, Université de Toulouse-Lé Mirail, F.
40. Viceme, K. J. (1999). Cognitive work analysis: Towards safe, productive, and healthy compttter-based work. Mahsvali, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41. Visser, W., & Falzon, P. (1992). Categorisation et types d'expertise. Une étude empirique dans le domaine de la conception industrielle. Intellectica, 1992 (3), 27-53.
42. Webb, B. (1996). The role of users in interactive system design: When computers are theatre, do we want the audience to write the script? Behaviour and Information Technology, 15, 76-83.
43. Wisner, A. (1989). Fatigue and human reliability revisited in the light of ergonomics and work psychopathology. Ergonomics, 32, 891-898.
44. Woods, D. D., & Sarter, K. (1998). Learning from automation surprises and "going sour" accidents: Progress on human centered automation (Tech. Rep. No. ERGO-CSEL-98-02). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, Institute for Ergonomics.