Cockpit automation: From quantity to quality, from individual pilot to multiple agents

Automation and Human Performance: Theory and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 267-280

  Sarter, Nadine B ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS;

AUTOMATED SYSTEMS; DESIGN PHILOSOPHY; HUMAN USERS; MULTIPLE AGENTS; OPERATIONAL COMMUNITY; SYSTEM OPERATION;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 85052434518     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781315137957     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Air Transport Association (AT A) of America (1989). National plan to enhance aviation safety through human factors improvements. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Bennett, K. B., & Flach, J. M. (1992). Graphical displays: Implications for divided attention, focused attention, and problem solving. Human Factors, 34(5), 513-533.
3. Billings, C. E. (1991). Human-centered aircraft automation: A concept and guidelines (NASA Tech. Memorandum 103885). Moffett Field, CA: NASA-Ames Research Center.
4. Carroll, J. M., & Olson, J. R. (1988). Mental models in human-computer interaction. In M. Helander (Ed.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 45-65). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
5. Edwards, E. (1977). Automation in civil transport aircraft. Applied Ergonomics, 8, 194-198.
6. Eldredge, D., Dodd, R. S., & Mangold, S. J. (1991). A review and discussion of flight management system incidents reported to the aviation safety reporting system (Battelie Report, prepared for the Department of Transportation). Columbus, OH: Volpe National Transportation Systems Center.
7. Feltovich, P. J., Spiro, R. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1991). Learning, teaching and testing for complex conceptual understanding (Southern Illinois University School of Medicine Tech. Rep. 6). Springfield, IL: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
8. Greeno, J. G. (1994). Gibson’s affordances. Psychological Review, 101(2), 336-342.
9. Hancock, P. A. (1992). On the future of hybrid human-machine systems. In J. A. Wise, V.
10. D. Hopkin, & P. Stager (Eds.), Verification and validation of complex systems (pp. 61-85). (NATO-ASI Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences, V. 10)
11. Javaux, D., Masson, M., & DeKeyser, V. (1993, July). Beware of agents when flying aircraft. Paper presented at the International NATO Workshop on Human Factors Certification of Advanced Aviation Systems, Chateau de Bonas, France.
12. Lenorovitz, J. M. (1990, June 25). Indian A320 crash probe data show crew improperly configured the aircraft. Aviation Week and Space Technology, pp. 84-85.
13. Malin, J. T., Schreckenghost, D. L., Woods, D. D., Potter, S. S., Johannesen, L., Holloway, M., & Forbus, K. D. (1991). Making intelligent systems team players: Case studies and design issues— Volume 1: Human-computer interaction design (NASA Technical Memorandum 104738). Houston, TX: NASA-Johnson Space Center.
14. NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration—Office of Aeronautics and Space Technology) (1988). Aviation safety/automation—A plan for a research initiative. Washington, DC: Author.
15. Norman, D. A. (1981). Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88(1), 1-15.
16. Norman, S. D., & Orlady, H. W. (Eds.). (1989). Flight deck automation: Promises and realities. Proceedings of a NASA/FAA/Industry Workshop, Carmel Valley, CA. (NASA Conference Publication 10036, August 1988)
17. Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R., & Singh, I. L. (1993). Performance consequences of automation-induced complacency. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(1), 1-23.
18. Roscoe, A. H. (Ed.). (1987). The practical assessment of pilot workload. (NATO AGARDo-graph No. 282). Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service
19. Sarter, N. B., & Woods, D. D. (1992). Pilot interaction with cockpit automation: Operational experiences with the flight management system. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 2, 303-321.
20. Sarter, N. B., & Woods, D. D. (1994). Pilot interaction with cockpit automation II: An experimental study of pilots’ model and awareness of the flight management system. The InternationaI Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4(1), 1-28.
21. Sarter, N. B., & Woods, D. D. (1995a). How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Human Factors, 37(1), 5-19.
22. Sarter, N. B., & Woods, D. D. (1995b). Strong, silent, and out-of-the-loop: Properties of advanced (cockpit) automation and their impact on human-machine coordination. (Cognitive Systems Engineering Laboratory [CSEL] Technical Report, 95-TR-Ol). Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University, CSEL.
23. Segal, L. D. (1990). Effects of aircraft cockpit design on crew communication. In E. J. Lovesey (Ed.), Contemporary ergonomics 1990 (pp. 247-252). London: Taylor and Francis.
24. Sparaco, P. (1994, January 1). Human factors cited in French A320 crash. Aviation Week and Space Technology, pp. 30-31.
25. Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., Feltovich, P. J., & Anderson, D. K. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 375-383). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Wagenaar, W. A., & Keren, G. B. (1986). Does the expert know? The reliability of predictions and confidence ratings of experts. In E. Hollnagel, G. Mancini, and D. D. Woods (Eds.), Intelligent decision support in process environments (pp. 87-103). New York: SpringerVerlag.
27. Wickens, C. D. (1994, September). Designing for situation awareness and trust in automation. Paper presented at the IFAC Conference on Integrated Systems Engineering, Baden-Baden, Germany.
28. Wiener, E. L. (1988). Cockpit automation. In: E. L. Wiener & D. C. Nagel (Eds), Human factors in aviation (pp. 433-461). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
29. Wiener, E. L. (1989). Human factors of advanced technology (“gloss cockpit“) transport aircraft (Technical Report 177528). Moffett Field, CA: NASA-Ames Research Center.
30. Wiener, E. L., & Curry, R. E. (1980). Flight deck automation: Promises and problems. Ergonomics, 23, 995-1011.
31. Wiener, E. L. (1993a). Crew coordination and training in the advanced-technology cockpit. In E. L. Wiener, B. G. Kanki, & R. L. Helmreich (Eds.), Cockpit resource management (pp. 199-2230). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
32. Wiener, E. L. (1993b). Intervention Strategies for the Management of Human Error (NASA Contractor Report 4547). Moffett Field, CA: NASA-Ames Research Center.
33. Wiener, E. L., Chidester, T. R., Kanki, B. G., Palmer, E. A., Curry, R. E., & Gregorich, S. E. (1991). The impact of cockpit automation on crew coordination and communication: I. Overview, LOFT evaluations, error severity, and questionnaire data (NASA Contractor Report 177587). Moffett Field, CA: NASA-Ames Research Center.
34. Woods, D. D. (1991). The cognitive engineering of problem representation. In G. R. S. Weir & J. L. Alty (Eds.), Human-computer interaction and complex systems (pp. 169-188). London: Academic Press.
35. Woods, D. D. (1993). The price of flexibility in intelligent interfaces. Knowledge-Based Systems, 6, 1-8.
36. Woods, D. D., Johannesen, L. J., Cook, R.I., Sarter, N. B. (1994). Behind human error: Cognitive systems, computers, and hindsight (State-of-the-art report). Dayton, OH: Crew Systems Ergonomic Information and Analysis Center.