Reference in library and information science education

Library Trends

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 245-262

  Chandler, Yvonne J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035564828     PISSN: 00242594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abels, E. G. (1997). Improving reference service cost studies. Library & Information Science Research, 19(2), 135-152.
2. Association for Library and Information Science Education, Educating library and information science professionals for a new century: The KALIPER report, Executive summary, July 2000.
3. Barron D. D., & Blessinger, K. (2000). Curriculum. In Library and information science education statistical report 2000. Reston: Association for Library and Information Science Education. http://ils.unc.edu/ALISE/2000/Curriculum00.htm.
4. Bryant, E. (2000). The changing face of reference. Library Journal, 125(19), 8-9.
5. Crawford, W. (1998). Paper persists: Why physical library collections still matter. Online, 22(1), 42-48.
6. Crosby, O. (2000). Librarians: information experts in the information age. Occupational Outlook Quarterly Online, 44(4), 2-15. http://www.bls.gov/opub/ooq/2000/winter/ contents.htm.
7. Durrance, J. C. (2000). KALIPER: What the field says about LIS education at the dawn of a new century: An introduction. Reston: Association for Library and Information Science Education.
8. Green, S. S. (1876). Personal relations between librarians and readers. American Library Journal, 1(2-3), 74-81.
9. Heim K. M., & Meon, W. E. (1989). Occupational entry: Library and information science students' attitudes, demographics, and aspirations survey. Chicago: American Library Association.
10. Hopkins, R. L. (1991). Ranking the reference books: Methodologies for identifying "key" reference sources. The Reference Librarian, 33, 77-102.
11. Keller, L. (2000). Looking it up, not an endangered career. Cable News Network - Career - Trends,. http://www.cnn.com/2000/CAREER/trends/11/28/librarians/index.html.
12. Lynch, M. J. (1982). Information. In G. A. Schlacter (Ed.), The service imperative for libraries: Essays in honor of Margaret E. Monroe (pp. 21-41). Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
13. Marco, G. A. (1994). The demise of the American core curriculum. Libri, 44(3), 175-189.
14. Mardikian, J., & Kesselman, M. (1995). Beyond the desk: Enhanced reference staffing for the electronic library. Reference Services Review, 23(1), 21-28.
15. Massey-Burzio, V. (1991). Education and experience: Or, the MLS is not enough. Reference Services Review, 19(1), 72-73.
16. Muirhead, B. (2000). Interactivity in a graduate distance education school. Educational Technology & Society, 3(1).
17. Nahl, D. (1999). Creating user-centered instructions for novice end-users. Reference Services Review, 27(3), 280-286.
18. Naismith R., & Stein, J. (1989). Library jargon: Student comprehension of technical language used by librarians. College & Research Libraries, 50(5), 543-552.
19. Nardi, B. A. (1998). Information ecologies - Highlights of the keynote address. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 38(1), 49-50.
20. Nardi, B. A., & O'Day, V. L. (1999). Information ecologies: Using technology with heart. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Nofsinger, M. M. (1999). Training and retraining reference professionals: Core competencies for the 21st century. The Reference Librarian, 64, 9-19.
22. Pawley, C. (1998). Hegemony's handmaid? The library and information studies curriculum from a class perspective. Library Quarterly, 68(2), 123-144.
23. Peek, R. (1998). Miss web manners on digital libraries. Information Today, 15(7), 36.
24. Pfaffenberger, B. (1990). Democratizing information: Online databases and the rise of end-user searching. Boston: G. K. Hall.
25. Radford, G. P., & Budd, J. M. (1997). We do need a philosophy of library and information science - we're not confused enough: A response to Zwadlo. Library Quarterly, 67(3), 315-321.
26. Saye, Jerry D. (2000). Students. In Library and information science education statistical report 2000. Reston: Association for Library and Information Science Education.
27. Stieg, M. (1990). Technology and the concept of reference or what will happen to the milkman's cow? Library Journal, 115(7), 45-49.
28. Still, J., & Campbell, F. (1993). Librarian in a box: the use of electronic mail for reference. Reference Services Review, 21(1), 15-18.
29. Surprenant, T. T., & Perry-Holmes, C. (1985). The reference librarian of the future: A scenario. RQ, 25, 234-238.
30. Sutton, S. (1996). Future service models and the convergence of functions: The reference librarian as technician, author, and consultant. In K. Low (Ed.), The roles of reference librarians: Today and tomorrow (pp. 131-138). New York: Haworth Press.
31. Swan, J. (1988). Information and madness. Library Journal, 113(2), 25-28.
32. Tenopir, C. (1995). Impacts of electronic reference on instruction and reference. In L. Shirato (Ed.), The Impart of technology on library instruction (Papers and session materials presented at the 21st National LOEX Library Instruction Conference 14-15 May 1993) (pp. 1-8). Ann Arbor: Pierian Press.
33. Tenopir, C. (1999). Electronic reference and reference librarians: A look through the 1990s. Reference Services Review, 27(3), 276-279.
34. U.S. Department of Labor. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2000). Librarians. In Occupational outlook handbook, 2001. Washington: U.S. Department of Labor.
35. White, H. S. (1999). Librarians and information technology: Which is the tail and which is the dog? Library Trends, 48(1), 264-277.
36. Wiegand, W. A. (2000). Core curriculum: A white paper. Chicago: American Library Association.
37. Wilson, M. C. (2000). Evolution or entropy? Changing reference/user culture and the future of reference librarians. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 39(4), 387-390.
38. Womack, K. W., & Rupp-Serrano, K. (2000). The librarian's apprentice: Reference graduate assistants. Reference Services Review, 28(2), 119-129.