Reconceptualizing mathematics problem solving for low-achieving students

Remedial and Special Education

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 102-112

  Bottge, Brian A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035532086     PISSN: 07419325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/074193250102200204     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. Adelman, H. S. (1994). Learning disabilities: On interpreting research translations. In N. C. Jordan & J. Goldsmith-Phillips (Eds.), Learning disabilities: New directions for assessment and intervention (pp. 1-19). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
2. Alexander, P. A., Murphy, P. K., & Woods, B. S. (1996). Of squalls and fathoms: Navigating the seas of educational innovation. Educational Researcher, 25(3), 31-36, 39.
3. Algozzine, B., O'Shea, D., Crews, W. B., & Stoddard, K. (1987). Analysis of mathematics competence of learning disabled adolescents. Journal of Special Education, 21, 97-107.
4. Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369-406.
5. Baroody, A. J., & Hume, J. (1991). Meaningful mathematics instruction: The case of fractions. Remedial and Special Education, 12, 54-68.
6. Battista, M. T. (1999). The mathematical miseducation of America's youth: Ignoring research and scientific study in education. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 424-433.
7. Beaton, A. E., Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1996). Mathematics achievement in the middle school years: IEA's third international mathematics and science study (TIMSS). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS International Study Center.
8. Bottge, B. A. (1999). Effects of contextualized math instruction on problem solving of average and below-average achieving students. Journal of Special Education, 33, 81-92.
9. Bottge, B. A., & Hasselbring, T. S. (1993). A comparison of two approaches for teaching complex, authentic mathematics problems to adolescents in remedial math classes. Exceptional Children, 59, 556-566.
10. Bottge, B. A., Heinrichs, M., Chan, S., & Serlin, R. (2000). Effects of enhanced anchors on the math performance of low-achieving adolescents. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
11. Bransford, J. D., Goin, L. I., Hasselbring, T. S., Kinzer, C. K., Sherwood, R. D., & Williams, S. M. (1988). Learning with technology: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Peabody Journal of Education, 64(1), 5-26.
12. Bransford, J., Hasselbring, T., Barron, B., Kulewicz, S., Littlefield, J., & Goin, L. (1988). Uses of macro-contexts to facilitate mathematical thinking. In R. I. Charles & E. A. Silver (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (pp. 125-180). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Bransford, J. D., & Vye, N. J. (1989). A perspective on cognitive research and its implications for instruction. In L. B. Resnick & L. E. Klopfer (Eds.), Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research (pp. 173-205). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
14. Bransford, J. D., Zech, L., Schwartz, D., Vye, N., & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1996). Fostering mathematical thinking. In R. J. Sternberg & T. Ben-Zeev (Eds.), The nature of mathematical thinking (pp. 203-250). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Brophy, J. (1986). Teaching and learning mathematics: Where research should be going. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17, 323-346.
16. Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1974). Teacher-student relationships: Causes and consequences. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
17. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Shauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289-325). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 17(1), 32-41.
19. Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. New York: Random House.
20. Carnine, D. (1997). Instructional design in mathematics for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 130-141.
21. Carpenter, R. L. (1985). Mathematics instruction in resource rooms: Instruction time and teacher competence. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 95-100.
22. Cawley, J. F. (1985). Cognition and the learning disabled. In J. F. Cawley (Fd.), Cognitive strategies and mathematics for the learning disabled (pp. 1-32). Rockford, MD: Aspen.
23. Cawley, J. F., & Miller, J. H. (1989). Cross-sectional comparisons of the mathematical performance of learning disabled children: Are we on the right track toward comprehensive programming? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 250-255.
24. Cawley, J. F., Parmar, R. S., Yan, W., & Miller, J. H. (1998). Arithmetic computation performance of students with learning disabilities: Implications for curriculum. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 68-74.
25. Ceci, S. J., & Roazzi, A. (1994). The effects of context on cognition: Post-cards from Brazil. In R. J. Sternberg & R. K. Wagner (Eds.), Mind in context: Interactionist perspectives on human intelligence (pp. 74-101). New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Research, 19(6), 2-10.
27. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Darch, C. B., Carnine, D. W., & Kameenui, E. G. (1986). The role of graphic organizers and social structure in content area instruction. Journal of Reading Behavior, 18, 275-295.
29. Deci, E. L., & Chandler, C. L. (1986). The importance of motivation for the future of the LD field. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 587-594.
30. De Corte, E., Greer, B., & Verschaffel, L. (1996). Mathematics teaching and learning. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 491-549). New York: Simon & Schuster.
31. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
32. Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work. Review of Educational Research, 53, 159-199.
33. Edgar, E. (1987). Secondary programs in special education: Are many of them justifiable? Exceptional Children, 53, 555-561.
34. Ellis, E. S. (1993). Integrative strategy instruction: A potential model for teaching content area subjects to adolescents with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 358-383.
35. Ellis, E. S. (1998). Watering up the curriculum for adolescents with learning disabilities: Part 2. Remedial and Special Education, 19, 91-105.
36. Englert, C. S., Tarrant, K. L., & Mariage, T. V. (1992). Defining and redefining instructional practice in special education: Perspectives on good teaching. Teacher Education and Special Education, 15, 62-86.
37. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new era of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
38. Gamoran, A., Porter, A., Smithson, J., & White, P. (1997). Upgrading high school mathematics instruction: Improving learning opportunities for low-achieving, low-income youth. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 325-338.
39. Gersten, R. (1998). Recent advances in instructional research for students with learning disabilities: An overview. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 162-170.
40. Gersten, R., & Chard, D. (1999). Number sense: Rethinking arithmetic instruction for students with mathematical disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 33, 18-28.
41. Ginsburg, H. P. (1997). Mathematics learning disabilities: A view from developmental psychology. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 20-33.
42. Ginsburg, H. P. (1998). Mathematics learning disabilities: A view from developmental psychology. In D. P. Rivera (Ed.), Mathematics education for students with learning disabilities: Theory to practice (pp. 33-58). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
43. Goldman, S. R., Hasselbring, T. S., & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). Achieving meaningful mathematics literacy for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 198-208.
44. Greeno, J. G. (1993). For research to reform education and cognitive science. In L. A. Penner, G. M. Batsche, H. M. Knoff, & D. L. Nelson (Eds.), The challenge in mathematics and science education: Psychology's response (pp. 153-192). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
45. Greeno, J. G., & Middle School Mathematics Through Applications Project Group. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53(1), 5-26.
46. Groen, G., & Resnick, L. B. (1977). Can preschool children invent addition algorithms? Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 645-652.
47. Hasselbring, T. S., Sherwood, R. D., Bransford, J. D., Mertz, J., Estes, B., Marsh, J., & Van Haneghan, J. (1991). An evaluation of specific video-disc courseware on student learning in a rural school environment (technical report). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University, Learning Technology Center.
48. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1993). Desituating cognition through the construction of conceptual knowledge. In P. Light & G. Butterworth (Eds.), Context and cognition: Ways of learning and knowing (pp. 115-133). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., Olivier, A., & Wearne, D. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 12-21.
50. Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1-27). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Hofmeister, A. M. (1993). Elitism and reform in school mathematics. Remedial and Special Education, 14(6), 8-13.
52. Hutchinson, N. L. (1993). Students with disabilities and mathematics education reform - Let the dialogue begin. Remedial and Special Education, 14(6), 20-23.
53. Jones, E. D., Wilson, R., & Bhojwani, S. (1997). Mathematics instruction for secondary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 151-163.
54. Knapp, M. S., & Turnbull, B. J. (1990). Better schooling for the children of poverty: Alternatives to conventional wisdom (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Budget and Evaluation.
55. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.
56. Lave, J. (1993). Word problems: A microcosm of theories of learning. In P. Light & G. Butterworth (Eds.), Context and cognition: Ways of learning and knowing (pp. 74-92). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. Lave, J., Smith, S., & Butler, M. (1988). Problem solving as an everyday practice. In R. I. Charles & E. A. Silver (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (pp. 61-81). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
58. Lester, F. K., Jr. (1985). Methodological considerations in research on mathematical problem-solving instruction. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 41-69). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
59. Mack, N. K. (1990). Learning fractions with understanding: Building on informal knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 16-32.
60. MacMillan, D. L., Keogh, B. K., & Jones, R. L. (1986). Special educational research on mildly handicapped learners. In W. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 686-724). New York: Macmillan.
61. Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Shiah, S. (1991). Mathematics instruction for learning disabled students: A review of research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 6, 89-98.
62. Mayer, R. E. (1985). Implications of cognitive psychology for instruction in mathematical problem solving. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 123-138). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
63. Meltzer, L. J. (1994). Assessment of learning disabilities: The challenge of evaluating the cognitive strategies and processes underlying learning. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities (pp. 571-606). Baltimore: Brookes.
64. Mercer, C. D., Harris, C. A., & Miller, S. P. (1993). Reforming reforms in mathematics. Remedial and Special Education, 14, 14-19.
65. Mercer, C. D., Jordan, L., & Miller, S. P. (1994). Implications of constructivism for teaching math to students with moderate to mild disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 28, 290-306.
66. Mercer, C. D., & Miller, S. P. (1992). Teaching students with learning problems in math to acquire, understand, and apply basic math facts. Remedial and Special Education, 13(3), 19-35, 61.
67. Miller, S. P., & Mercer, C. D. (1998). Educational aspects of mathematics disabilities. In D. P. Rivera (Ed.), Mathematics education for students with learning disabilities: Theory to practice (pp. 81-96). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
68. Montague, M. (1992). The effects of cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction on the mathematical problem solving of middle school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 230-248.
69. Montague, M., Applegate, G., & Marquard, K. (1993). Cognitive strategy instruction and mathematical problem-solving performance of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 223-232.
70. Montague, M., & Bos, C. (1986). The effect of cognitive strategy training on verbal math problem solving performance of learning disabled adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 26-33.
71. Morris, D. R. (1997). Adrift in the sea of innovations: A response to Alexander, Murphy, and Woods. Educational Researcher, 26(4), 22-26.
72. Mtetwa, D., & Garofalo, J. (1989). Beliefs about mathematics: An overlooked aspect of student difficulties. Academic Therapy, 24, 611-618.
73. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Evaluation standards: Curriculum and evaluation for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
74. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
75. National Research Council. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
76. Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1992). NAEP 1992 trends in academic progress. Washington, DC: Author.
77. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
78. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1989). Classroom dialogues to promote self-regulated comprehension (Vol. 1). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
79. Peterson, P. L., Fennema, E., & Carpenter, T. (1991). Using children's mathematical knowledge. In B. Means, C. Chelemer, & M. Knapp (Eds.), Teaching advanced skills to at-risk students (pp. 68-101). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
80. Phelps, A., & Hanley-Maxwell, C. (1997). School to work transitions for youth with disabilities: A review of outcomes and practices. Review of Educational Research, 67, 197-226.
81. Polloway, E. A., Patton, J. R., Epstein, M. H., & Smith, T. E. C. (1989). Comprehensive curriculum for students with mild handicaps. Focus on Exceptional Children, 21(8), 1-12.
82. Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
83. Polya, G. (1962). Mathematical discovery: On understanding, learning, and teaching problem solving (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley.
84. Resnick, L. B., & Ford, W. W. (1981). The psychology of mathematics for instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
85. Rivera, D. M. (1993). Examining mathematics reform and the implications for students with mathematics disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 14(6), 24-27.
86. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalian in the classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
87. Salend, S. J., & Ganick Duhaney, L. M. (1999). The impact of inclusion on students with and without disabilities and their educators. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 114-126.
88. Saxe, G. B., Dawson, V., Fall, R., & Howard, S. (1996). Culture and children's mathematical thinking. In R. J. Sternberg & T. Ben-Zeev (Eds.), The nature of mathematical thinking (pp. 119-144). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
89. Scanlon, D., Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (1996). Can a strategy be taught and learned in secondary inclusive classrooms? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 11, 41-57.
90. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Metacognitive and epistemological issues in mathematical understanding. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 361-379). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
91. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1989). Teaching mathematical thinking and problem solving. In L. B. Resnick & L. E. Klopfer (Eds.), Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research (pp. 83-103). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
92. Scott, B. J., Vitale, M. R., & Masten, W. G. (1998). Implementing instructional adaptations for students with disabilities in inclusive classrooms. Remedial and Special Education, 19, 106-119.
93. Silver, E. A. (1985). Research on teaching mathematical problem solving: Some underrepresented themes and needed directions. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 247-266). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
94. Silver, E. A., & Stein, M. K. (1996). The QUASAR Project: The "Revolution of the Possible" in mathematics instructional reform in urban middle schools. Urban Education, 30, 476-521.
95. Singer, J. A., Kohn, A. S., & Resnick, L. B. (1997). Knowing about proportions in different contexts. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.), Learning and teaching mathematics: An international perspective (pp. 115-132). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
96. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
97. Thorndike, E. L. (1922). Psychology of arithmetic. New York: Macmillan.
98. Thorndike, E. L., & Woodworm, R. S. (1901). The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. Psychological Review, 8, 247-261, 384-395, 553-564.
99. Torgesen, J., & Kail, R. (1980). Advances in special education. In B. K. Keogh (Ed.), Memory processes in exceptional children (Vol. 1, pp. 232-249). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
100. Trent, S. C., Artiles, A. J., & Englert, C. S. (1998). From deficit thinking to social constructivism: A review of theory, research, and practice in special education. In P. D. Pearson & A. Iran-Nefad (Eds.), Review of research in education (pp. 277-307). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
101. U.S. Congress. (1994). Goals 2000: Educate America Act [Online]. URL: http://www.ed.gov/legislation/GOALS2000/TheAct/
102. U.S. Department of Labor. (1991). What work requires of schools: A SCANS report for America 2000. Washington, DC: The Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills.
103. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
104. Wagner, R. K. (1994). Context counts: The case of cognitive-ability testing for job selection. In R. J. Sternberg & R. K. Wagner (Eds.), Mind in context: Interactionist perspectives on human intelligence (pp. 133-151). New York: Cambridge University Press.
105. Weinstein, R. S., & McKown, C. (1998). Expectancy effects in "context": Listening to the voices of students and teachers. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 7, pp. 215-242). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
106. Weinstein, R. S., & Middlestadt, S. E. (1979). Student perceptions of teachers interactions with high and low achievers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 421-431.
107. Wertheimer, M. (1959). Productive thinking. New York: Harper & Brothers.
108. Whitehead, A. M. (1929). The aims of education. New York: Macmillan.
109. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., & Rodriguez, D. (1998). The development of children's motivations in school contexts. In P. D. Pearson & A. Iran-Nefad (Eds.), A review of research in education (pp. 73-118). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
110. Wilson, C. L., & Sindelar, P. T. (1991). Direct instruction in math word problems: Students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 57, 512-519.