Ambivalence, conflict, and decision making: Attitudes and feelings in Germany towards NATO's military intervention in the Kosovo war

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 693-706

  Hänze, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KASSEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035498092     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.57     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Baron J, Spranca M. 1997. Protected values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 70: 1-16.
2. Beswick G, Mann L. 1994. State orientation and procrastination. In Volition and Personality: Action versus State Orientation, Kuhl J, Beckmann J (eds). Hogrefe & Huber: Seattle; 391-396.
3. Bless H, Wänke M, Bohner G, Fellhauer RF, Schwarz N. 1994. Need for Cognition: Eine Skala zur Erfassung von Engagement und Freude bei Denkaufgaben. (Need for cognition: a scale measuring engagement and happiness in cognitive tasks). Zeitschrift fuer Sozialpsychologie 25: 147-154.
4. Breckler SJ. 1994. A comparison of numerical indexes for measuring attitude ambivalence. Educational and Psychological Measurement 54: 350-365.
5. Broemer P. 1998. Ambivalent attitudes and information processing. Swiss Journal of Psychology 57: 225-234.
6. Cacioppo JT, Berntson GG. 1994. Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: a critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin 115: 401-423.
7. Cacioppo JT, Gardner WL. 1999. Emotion. Annual Review of Psychology 50: 191-214.
8. Cacioppo JT, Petty RE. 1982. The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42: 116-131.
9. Damasio AR. 1994. Descartes' Error. Emotions, Reason and the Human Brain. Putnam's Son: New York.
10. Damasio AR. 1998. The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. In The Prefrontal Cortex: Executive and Cognitive Functions, Roberts AC, Robbins TW (eds). Oxford University Press: New York; 36-50.
11. Damasio AR, Tranel D, Damasio HC. 1991. Somatic markers and the guidance of behavior: theory and preliminary testing. In Frontal Lobe Function and Dysfunction, Levin HS, Eisenberg HM (eds). Oxford University Press: New York; 217-229.
12. Epstein S, Pacini R, Denes-Raj V, Heier H. 1996. Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 390-405.
13. Fazio RH. 1990. Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: the mode model as an integrative framework. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 23: 75-109.
14. Fazio RH, Blascovich J, Driscoll DM. 1992. On the functional value of attitudes: the influence of accessible attitudes on the ease and quality of decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 18: 388-401.
15. Folkman S, Lazarus RS. 1988. Coping as a mediator of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54: 466-475.
16. Freund T, Kruglanski AW, Shiptajzen A. 1985. The freezing and unfreezing of impressional primacy: effects of need for structure and the fear of invalidity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 11: 479-487.
17. Gollnish G, Averill JR. 1993. Emotional imagery: strategies and correlates. Cognition and Emotion 7: 407-429.
18. Mass RG, Katz I, Rizzo N, Bailey J, Eisenstadt D. 1991. Cross-racial appraisal as related to attitude ambivalence and cognitive complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17: 83-92.
19. Jaccard J, Turrisi R, Wan CK. 1990. Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Sage: Newbury Park, CA.
20. Janis IL, Mann L. 1977. Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. Free Press: New York.
21. Jonas K, Broemer P, Diehl M. 2000. Experienced ambivalence as a moderator of the consistency between attitudes and behaviors. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 31: 153-165.
22. Jonas K, Diehl M, Broemer P. 1997. Effects of attitudinal ambivalence on information processing and attitude-intention consistency. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 33: 190-210.
23. Kaplan KJ. 1972. On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: a suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. Psychological Bulletin 77: 361-372.
24. Katz D. 1960. The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly 24: 163-204.
25. Keller J, Bohner G, Erb HP. 2000. Intuitive und heuristische Urteilsbildung - verschiedene Prozesse? Präsentation einer deutschen Fassung des 'Rational-Experiential Inventory' sowie neuer Selbstberichtskalen zur Heuristiknutzung. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 31: 87-101.
26. Klein G, Crandall BW. 1995. The role of mental simulation in problem solving and decision making. In Local Applications of the Ecological Approach to Human-Machine Systems (Vol. 2), Hanckock P, Flach J, Caird J, Vicente K (eds). Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ; 324-358.
27. Kuhl J. 1985. Kurzanweisung zum Fragebogen HAKEMP 85. Max-Planck-Institut für psychologische Forschung: München.
28. Kuhl J. 1994. Action versus state orientation: Psychometric properties of the Action Control Scale (ACS-90). In Volition and Personality: Action versus State Orientation. Kuhl J, Beckmann J (eds). Hogrefe & Huber: Seattle; 47-59.
29. Lazarus RS. 1991. Emotion and Adaptation. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
30. Luce MF. 1998. Choosing to avoid: Coping with negatively emotion-laden consumer decisions. Journal of Consumer Research 24: 409-433.
31. Luce MF, Bettman JR, Payne JW. 1997. Choice processing in emotionally difficult decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23: 384-405.
32. Maio GR, Bell DW, Esses V. 1996. Ambivalence and persuasion: the processing of messages about immigrant groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 32: 513-536.
33. Moore M. 1973. Ambivalence in attitude measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement 33: 481-483.
34. Pham LB, Taylor SE. 1999. From thought to action: Effects of process-versus outcome-based mental simulations on performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25: 250-260.
35. Plutchik R. 1975. Programmed Learning Aid for Emotion. Irwin: Homewood, IL.
36. Priester JR, Petty RE. 1996. The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 431-449.
37. Sack PM. 1990. Eine revidierte Skala zur Messung von Handlungskontrolle. (A revised scale for assessing action control.) Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie 11: 233-241.
38. Scott WA. 1966. Brief Report: Measures of Cognitive Structure. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1: 391-395.
39. Taylor SE, Pham LB. 1999. The effect of mental simulation on goal-directed performance. Imagination, cognition and personality 18: 253-268.
40. Tetlock PE. 1989. Structure and function in political belief systems. In Attitude Structure and Function, Pratkanis AR, Breckler SJ, Greenwald AG (eds). Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ; 129-151.
41. Tetlock PE, Peterson RS, Lerner JS. 1996. Revising the value pluralism model: incorporating social content and context postulates. In The Psychology of Values: The Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 8), Seligman C, Olson JM (eds). Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ; 25-51.
42. Thompson MM, Zanna MP. 1995. The conflicted individual: personality-based and domain-specific antecedents of ambivalent social attitudes. Journal of Personality 63: 259-288.
43. Thompson MM, Zanna MP, Griffin DW. 1995. Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In Attitude Strength: Antecedents and consequences. Ohio State University Series on Attitudes and Persuasion (Vol. 4), Petty RE, Krosnick JA (eds). Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ; 361-386.
44. Thomsen CJ, Borgida E, Lavine H. 1995. The causes and consequences of personal involvement. In Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. Ohio State University Series on Attitudes and Persuasion (Vol. 4), Petty RE, Krosnick JA (eds). Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ; 191-214.