Bonded Molar Tubes - An in Vitro Evaluation

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 71, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 380-385

  Millett, Declan T ^a   Letters, Sharon ^b   Roger, Emma ^b   Cummings, Alistair ^a   Love, Jan ^c  

^a GLASGOW DENTAL HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b N Glasgow Univ Hospitals NHS Trust ^*

^c UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bonded molar tubes; Compomer; Resin modified glass ionomer cement; Weibull analysis

Indexed keywords

3M MULTI CURE; 3M MULTI-CURE; ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; ALUMINUM SILICATE; BAND LOK; BAND-LOK; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; COMPOMER; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; FUJI ORTHO LC; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN CEMENT; TRANSBOND;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PROBABILITY; RANDOMIZATION; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ALUMINUM SILICATES; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOMERS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES; PROBABILITY; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 0035489501     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955;34: 849-853.
2. Zachrisson BU. A post-treatment evaluation of direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod. 1977;71:173-189.
3. Mizrahi E. Orthodontic bands and directly bonded brackets: a review of clinical failure rates. J Dent. 1983;11:231-236.
4. Millett DT, Gordon PH. A 5-year clinical review of bond failure with a non-mix adhesive (Right-On). Eur J Orthod. 1994;16:203-211.
5. Gorelick L. Bonding: the state of the art, a national survey. J Clin Orthod. 1979;13:39-53.
6. Lovius BB. Pender N, Hewage S, O'Dowling I, Tomkins A. A clinical trial of a light-activated bonding material over an 18-month period. Br J Orthod. 1987;16:11-20.
7. O'Brien KD, Read MJF, Sandison RJ, Roberts CT. A visible light-activated direct-bonding material: an in vivo comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95:348-351.
8. Ash S, Hay N. Adhesive pre-coated brackets: a comparative clinical study. Br J Orthod. 1996;23:325-329.
9. Millett DT, McCabe JF. Orthodontic bonding with glass ionomer cements: a review. Eur J Orthod. 1996;18:385-399.
10. Mount GJ. Glass ionomer cements: past, present and future. Oper Dent. 1994;19:82-90.
11. McCabe JF. Resin modified glass ionomers. Biomaterials. 1998; 19:521-527.
12. Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS. 1996 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures, I: results and trends. J Clin Orthod. 1996;30:615-629.
13. Boyd RL, Baumrind S. Periodontal considerations in the use of bonds or bands on molars in adolescents and adults. Angle Orthod. 1992;62:117-126.
14. Knoll M, Gwinnett AJ, Wolff MS. Shear strength of brackets bonded to anterior and posterior teeth. Am J Orthod. 1986;89: 476-479.
15. Geiger AM, Gorelick L, Gwinnett AJ. Bond failure rates of facial and lingual attachments. J Clin Orthod. 1983;17:165-169.
16. Millett DT, Hallgren A, Fornell A-C, Robertson M. Bonded molar tubes: a retrospective evaluation of clinical performance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:667-674.
17. Johnston CD, Hussey DL, Burden DJ. The effect of etch duration on the micromorphology of molar enamel: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109:531-534.
18. Mattick CR, Hobson RS. A comparative micro-topographic study of the buccal enamel of different tooth types. J Orthod. 2000;27: 143-148.
19. Evans ZB, Powers JM. Factors affecting in-vitro bond strength of no mix orthodontic cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1985;87:508-512.
20. Johnston CD, Burden DJ, Hussey DL, Mitchell CA. Bonding to molars: the effect of etch time (an in vitro study). Eur J Orthod. 1998;20:195-199.
21. Silverman E, Cohen M, Demke RS, Silverman M. A new selfcuring hybrid glass ionomer. J Clin Orthod. 1997;31:315-318.
22. Millett DT, McCluskey L-A, McAuley F, Creanor SL, Newell J, Love J. A comparative clinical trial of a compomer and a resin adhesive for orthodontic bonding. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:233-240.
23. Shammaa I, Ngan P, Kim H, Kao E, Gladwin M, Gunel E, Brown C. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:463-469.
24. Millett DT, McCabe JF, Gordon PH. The role of sandblasting on the retention of metallic brackets applied with glass ionomer cement Br J Orthod. 1993;20:117-122.
25. Chung C, Cuozzo PT, Mante FK. Shear bond strength of a resin reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:52-54.
26. Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etching enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:333-340.
27. Weibull W. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech. 1951;14:165-168.
28. McCabe JF, Carrick TE. A statistical approach to the mechanical testing of dental materials. Dent Mater. 1986;2:139-142.
29. Britton JC, McInnes P, Weinberg R, Ledoux WR, Retief DH. Shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;98:348-353.
30. Holton JR, Nystrom GP, Phelps RA, Anderson TB, Becker WS. Influence of different etchants and etching times on shear bond strength. Oper Dent. 1995;20:94-99.
31. Fox NA, McCabe JF, Buckley JG. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod. 1994;21:33-43.
32. Komori A, Ishikawa H. Evaluation of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement for use as an orthodontic bonding agent Angle Orthod. 1997;67:189-196.
33. Millett DT, Cattanach D, McFadzean R, Pattison J, McColl J. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding. Angle Orthod. 1999;69: 58-64.
34. Owens SE, Miller BH. A comparison of shear bond strengths of three visible light-cured orthodontic adhesives. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:352-356.
35. Bishara SE, Olsen M, Damon P, Jakobsen J. Evaluation of a new light-cured orthodontic bonding adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114:80-87.
36. Reynolds IR. A review of direct bonding. Br J Orthod. 1979;2: 171-178.
37. Eliades T, Brantley WA. The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols. Eur J Orthod. 2000;22:13-24.
38. Rock WP, Abdullah MSB. Shear bond strengths produced by composite and compomer light cured orthodontic adhesives. J Dent. 1997;25:243-249.
39. Abu Kasim NH, Millett DT, McCabe JF. The ball mill as a means of investigating the mechanical failure of dental materials. J Dent. 1996;24:117-124.
40. Tarasiewicz A, Radzisewski P. Ball mill simulation, I: a kinetic model of ball mill charge motion. Trans Soc Comput Simulation. 1989;6:61-74.
41. Tarasiewicz A, Radzisewski P. Ball mill simulation, II: numerical solution to ball charge model. Trans Soc Comput Simulation. 1989;6:75-88.