Evaluation's future: Furor, futile, or fertile?

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 457-479

  Mark, Melvin M ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035457502     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1098-2140(01)00160-6     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Campbell, D. T. (1984). Can we be scientific in applied social science? In R. F. Connor, D. G. Altman, & C. Jackson (Eds.), Evaluation studies review annual, Vol. 9 (pp. 26-48). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Cousins, J. B., & Whitmore, E. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. In E. Whitmore (Ed.), Understanding and practicing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 80 (pp. 5-23). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Datta, L-e. (2001). Coming attractions. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 403-408.
4. Donaldson, S. I. (2001). Overcoming our negative reputation: Evaluation becomes known as a helping profession. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 355-361.
5. st century. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 381-385.
6. Greene, J. C. (2001). Evaluation extrapolations. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 397-402.
7. Henry, G. T. (1996). Does the public have a role in evaluation? Surveys and democratic discourses. In M. T. Braverman & J. K. Slater (Eds.), Advances in Survey Research, New Directions in Evaluation, 70 (pp. 85-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Henry, G. T. (2001). How modern democracies are shaping evaluation and the emerging challenges for evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 419-429.
9. Hopson, R. (2001). Cross-border conversations on culture and social justice in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 375-380.
10. House, E. R. (2001). Unfinished business: Causes and values. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 309-315.
11. House, E. R., & Howe, K. R. (1999). Values in evaluation and social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Lipsey, M. W. (2001). Re: Unsolved problems and unfinished business. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 325-328.
13. Love, A. J. (2001). The future of evaluation: Catching rocks with cauldrons. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 437-444.
14. Mark, M. M. (in press). Toward a comprehensive view of the theory and practice of program and policy evaluation. In S. I. Donaldson & M. Scriven (Eds.), Evaluating Social Programs and Problems: Visions for the New Millennium. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Mark, M. M., Henry, G. T., & Julnes, G. (2000). Evaluation: An integrated framework for understanding, guiding, and improving policies and programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Mertens, D. M. (2001). Inclusivity and transformation: Evaluation in 2010. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 367-374.
17. Newcomer, K. E. (2001). Tracking and probing program performance: Fruitful path or blind alley for evaluation professionals? American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 337-341.
18. Patton, M. Q. (2001). Evaluation, knowledge management, best practices, and high quality lessons learned. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 329-336.
19. Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (2001). Realistic evaluation bloodlines. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 317-324.
20. Rogers, P. J. (2001). The whole world is evaluating half-full glasses. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 431-435.
21. Sanders, J. R. (2001). A vision for evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 363-366.
22. Scriven, M. (2001). Evaluation: Future tense. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 301-307.
23. Smith, M. F. (2001). Evaluation: Preview of the future #2. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 281-300.
24. Stake, R. E. (2001). A problematic heading. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 349-354.
25. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2001). Interdisciplinary Ph.D. programming in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 445-455.
26. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2001). The metaevaluation imperative. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 183-209.
27. Torres, R. T., & Preskill, H. (2001). Evaluation and organizational learning: Past, present, and future. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 387-395.
28. Wholey, J. S. (2001) Managing for results: Roles for evaluators in a new management era. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 343-347.
29. Worthen, B. R. (2001). Whither evaluation? That all depends. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 409-418.