Inclusivity and transformation: Evaluation in 2010

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 367-374

  Mertens, Donna M ^a  

^a GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035457166     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1098-2140(01)00150-3     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Agar, M. (2000). Border lessons: Linguistic "rich points" and evaluative understanding. In R. K. Hopson (Ed.), How and why language matters. New Directions for Evaluation, Number 86 (pp. 93-109). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2. American Evaluation Association. (2001). American Evaluation Association Initiative for Building Diversity: Survey of evaluators of color. Magnolia, AR: Author.
3. Banks, J. (2000). The social construction of difference and the quest for educational equality. In R. S. Bradt (Ed.), Education in a new era (pp. 21-45). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
4. Cohen-Mitchell, J. A. (2000). Disabled women in El Salvador reframing themselves: A case study of an economic development program for women. In C. Truman, D. M. Mertens, & B. Humphries (Eds.), Research and inequality (pp. 143-176). London: Taylor & Francis.
5. Gill, C. (1999). Invisible ubiquity: The surprising relevance of disability issues in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 279-287.
6. Hopson, R. K., Lucas, K. J., & Peterson, J. A. (2000). HIV/AIDS talk: Implications for prevention intervention and evaluation. In R. K. Hopson (Ed.), How and why language matters in evaluation. New Directions in Evaluation, Number 86 (pp. 29-42). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7. House, E. R., & Howe, K. R. (1999). Values in evaluation and social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The program evaluation standards: How to assess evaluations of educational programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Kirkhart, K. E. (1995). Seeking multicultural validity: A postcard from the road. Evaluation Practice, 16, 1-12.
10. Madaus, G. F., Scriven, M. S., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (Eds.). (1983). Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. Madison, A. M. (2000). Language in defining social problems and in evaluating social programs. In R. K. Hopson (Ed.), How and why language matters. New Directions for Evaluation, Number 86 (pp. 17-28). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12. Meadow-Orlans, K. (2000). Social change and conflict: Context for research on deafness. In M. D. Clark, M. Marschark, & M. Karchmer (Eds.), Context, cognition, and deafness. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
13. Mertens, D. M. (in press). Mixed methods and the politics of human research: The transformative-emancipatory perspective. In C. Teddlie & A. Tashakkori (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Mertens, D. M. (2000a). Institutionalizing evaluation in the United States of America. In R. Stockmann (Ed.), Evaluation research (pp. 41-56). Saarbrucken, Germany: Leske & Budrich.
15. Mertens, D. M. (2000b). Deaf and hard of hearing people in court: Using an emancipatory perspective to determine their needs. In C. Truman, D. M. Mertens, & B. Humphries (Eds.), Research and inequality (pp. 111-125). London: Taylor & Francis.
16. Mertens, D. M. (1999). Inclusive evaluation: Implications of transformative theory for evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 1-14.
17. Mertens, D. M. (1998). Research methods in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative and qualitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Mertens, D. M., & Russon, C. (2000). A proposal for the International Organization for Cooperation in Evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 275-283.
19. Reason, P. (Ed.) (1994). Participation in human inquiry. London: Sage.
20. Shadish, W. R., Newman, D., Scheirer, M. A., & Wye, C. (Eds.). (1995). The American Evaluation Association's guiding principles. New Directions in Program Evaluation, Number 66. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
21. Stanfield II, J. H. (1999). Slipping through the front door: Relevant social scientific evaluation in the people-of-color century. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 415-432.
22. United States Bureau of the Census. (2001). Census Bureau projects doubling of nation's population by 2100. Washington, DC: Author.
23. Whitmore, E. (Ed.). (1998). Understanding and practicing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, Number 80. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.