Tunnel restorations in general practice. Influence of some clinical variables on the success rate

Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 195-200

  Pyk, Nils ^b   Mejàre, Ingegerd ^a  

^a Eastman Dental Institute Stockholm   (Sweden)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Permanent dentition; Preparation technique

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; AGE; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHILD; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DISEASE COURSE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LIFE TABLE; METHODOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICS; TIME; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; AGE FACTORS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHILD; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CARIES ACTIVITY TESTS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LIFE TABLES; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0033176818     PISSN: 00016357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/000163599428779     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Black GOV. A work on operative dentistry. Chicago: Medico Dental Publishing, 1908. p. 158-7.
2. Hunt PR. A modified class II cavity preparation for glass ionomer restorative materials. Quintessence Int 1984;15:1011-8.
3. Svanberg M. Class II amalgam restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: a 3-year clinical study. Caries Res 1992;26:315-8.
4. Knight GM. The tunnel restoration - nine years of clinical experience using capsulated glass ionomer cements. Case report. Austr Dent J 1992;37:245-51.
5. Lumley PJ, Fisher FJ. Tunnel restorations: a long-term pilot study over a minimum of five years. J Dent 1995;23:213-5.
6. Lunder N. Tunnelrestaureringer etter fire år. Norske Tannl Tidende 1997;107:508-11.
7. Strand GV, Nordhø H, Tveit AB, Espelid I, Wikstrand K, Eide GE. A 3-year clinical study of tunnel restorations. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104:384-9.
8. Hasselrot L. Tunnel restorations in permanent teeth. A 7-year follow up study. Swed Dent J 1998;22:1-7.
9. Holst AL, Brännström M. Restoration of small proximal dentin lesions with the tunnel technique. Swed Dent J 1998;22:143-8.
10. Pilebro CE, van Dijken JWV, Stenberg R. Durability of tunnel restorations in general practice: a three-year multicenter study. Acta Odontol Scand 1999;57:35-9.
11. Jinks GM. Fluoride-impregnated cements and their effect on the activity of interproximal caries. J Dent Child 1963;30:87-92.
12. Strand G. Therapeutic and functional aspects of tunnel preparations in permanent teeth. Dissertation Bergen: University of Bergen; 1997.
13. Mejàre I, Malmgren B. Clinical and radiographic appearance of proximal carious lesions at the time of operative treatment in young permanent teeth. Scand J Dent Res 1986;94:19-26.
14. Fasbinder DJ, Davis RD, Burgess JO. Marginal ridge strength in class II tunnel restorations. Am J Dent 1991;4:77-82.
15. Strand GV, Tveit AB, Gjerdet NR, Eide GE. Marginal ridge strength of teeth with tunnel preparations. Int Dent J 1995; 45:117-23.
16. McLean JW. Limitations of posterior composite resins and extending their use with glass ionomer cements. Quintessence Int 1987;18:517-29.
17. Leidal TI, Mjör IA. Principles of cavity preparation. In: Hörsted-Bindslev P, Mjör IA, editors. Modern concepts in operative dentistry. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1988. p. 108-10.
18. Nordbø H, Leirskar J, von der Fehr FR. Saucer-shaped cavity preparations for posterior approximal composite resin restorations: observations up to 10 years. Quintessence Int 1998;29:5-11.
19. Qvist V, Johannessen L, Bruun M. Progression of approximal caries in relation to iatrogenic preparation damage. J Dent Res 1992;71:1370-3.
20. Berge TI. Acceptance and side effects of nitrous oxide oxygen sedation for oral surgical procedures. Acta Odontol Scand 1999;57:201-206. Oslo. ISSN 0001-6357.