Structurally Diverse Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Correlations of Technologically Relevant Physical Properties

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 1-18

  Katritzky, Alan R ^a   Maran, Uko ^b   Lobanov, Victor S ^c   Karelson, Mati ^b  

^a University of Florida   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

^c JOHNSON AND JOHNSON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002905234     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci9903206     Document Type: Review

References (230)

1. Martin, Y. C. 3D QSAR: Current State, Scope, and Limitations. Perspect. Drug Discov. 1998, 12, 3-23.
2. Norinder, U. Recent Progress in CoMFA Methodology and Related Techniques. Perspect. Drug Discov. 1998, 12, 25-39.
3. Maddalena, D. J. Applications of Soft Computing in Drug Design. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 1998, 8, 249-258.
4. Kubinyi, H. QSAR and 3D QSAR in Drug Design. 2. Applications and Problems. Drug Discov. Today 1997, 2, 538-546.
5. Hansch, C.; Fujita, T. Status of QSAR at the End of the Twentieth Century. In Classical and Three-Dimensional QSAR in a Agrochemistry; Hansch, C., Fujita, T., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1995; 606, pp 1-12.
6. Hansch, C.; Leo, A. Exploring QSAR, Fundamentals and Applications in Chemistry and Biology; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1995.
7. Stuper, A. J.; Brugger, W. E.; and Jurs, P. C. Computer-assisted Studies of Chemical Structure and Biological Function; While: New York, 1979.
8. Kier, L. B.; Hall, L. H. Molecular Connectivity in Structure-Activity Analysis; J. Wiley & Sons: New York, 1986.
9. Murray, J. S.; Politzer, P. A General Interaction Properties Function (GIPF): An Approach to Understanding and Predicting Molecular Interactions. In Quantitative Treatments of Solute/Solvent Interactions; Politzer, P., Murray, J. S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1994; pp 243-289.
10. Hilal, S. H.; Carreira, L. A.; Karickhoff, S. W. Estimation of Chemical Reactivity Parameter and Physical Properties of Organic Molecules Using SPARC. In Quantitative Treatments of Solute/Solvent Interactions; Politzer, P., Murray, J. S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1994; pp 291-353.
11. Abraham, M. H. New Solute Descriptors for Linear Free Energy Relationships and Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships, In Quantitative Treatments of Solute/Solvent Interactions; Politzer, P., Murray, J. S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1994; pp 83-133.
12. Abraham, M. H.; Chadha, H. S.; Dixon, J. P.; Rafols, C.; Treiner, C. Hydrogen Bonding. Part 40. Factors that Influence the Distribution of Solutes Between Water and Sodium Dodecylsulfate Micelles. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1995, 887-894.
13. Katritzky, A. R.; Lobanov, V. S.; Karelson, M. QSPR: The Correlation and Quantitative Prediction of Chemical and Physical Properties from Structure. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1995, 279-287.
14. Randic, M.; Razinger M. On the Characterization of Three-Dimensional Molecular Structure. In From Chemical Topology to Three-Dimensional Geometry; Balaban, A. T., Ed.; Plenum Press: New York, 1996; pp 159-236.
15. Balaban, A. T. From Chemical Topology to 3D Geometry. J. Chem. Inf Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 645-650.
16. Lucic, B.; Trinajstic. N. Multivariate Regression Outperforms Several Robust Architectures of Neural Networks in QSAR Modelling. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 121-132.
17. Jurs, P. C.; Chou, J. T.; Yuan, M. Studies of chemical structure-biological activity relations using pattern recognition. In Computer-Assisted Drug Design; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1978; Vol. 112, pp 103-129.
18. Karelson, M.; Maran, U.; Wang, Y.; Katritzky, A. R. QSPR and QSAR Models Derived Using Large Molecular Descriptor Spaces. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1999, 64, 1551-1571.
19. Karelson, M.; Lobanov, V. S.; Katritzky, A. R. Quantum-Chemical Descriptors in QSAR/QSPR Studies. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 1027-1043.
20. Kier, L. B.; Hall, L. H. Molecular Connectivity in Chemistry and Drug Research; Academic Press: New York, 1976.
21. Trinajstic, N. Chemical Graph Theory; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1983.
22. Bonchev, D. Information Theoretic Indices for Characterization of Chemical Structure; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1983.
23. Kaliszan, R. Quantitative Structure-Chromatographic Retention Relationships; J. Wiley & Sons: New York, 1987.
24. Merrifield, R. E.; Simmons, H. E. Topological Methods in Chemistry; J. Wiley & Sons: New York, 1989.
25. Rouvray, D. H., Ed. Computational Chemical Graph Theory; Nova Science Publishers: New York, 1990.
26. Myers, R. H. Classical and Modern Regression with Applications; PWS-KENT Publishing Co.: Boston, 1989.
27. Draper, N. R.; Smith, H. Applied Regression Analysis; J. Wiley & Sons: New York, 1981.
28. Malinowski, E. R.; Howery, D. G. Factor Analysis in Chemistry; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1980.
29. Strouf, O. Chemical Pattern Recognition; J. Wiley & Sons: New York, 1986.
30. Meloun, M.; Militky, M.; Forina, M. Chemometrics in Analytical Chemistry; Ellis Horwood: New York, 1992.
31. Zupan, J.; Gasteiger, J. Neural Networks for Chemists; VCH Publishers: Weinheim, 1993.
32. Mitchell, T. M. Machine Learning; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1997.
33. Gini, G.; Testaguzza, V.; Benfenati, E.; Todeschini, R. Hybrid Toxicology Expert Systems: Archidecture and Implementation of a Multi-domain Hybrid Expert Systems for Toxicology. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 1998, 43, 135-145.
34. Langmuir, I. The Distribution and Orientation of Molecules. Colloid Symp. Monogr. 1925, 3, 49-75.
35. Hermann, R. B. Theory of Hydrophobic Bonding. II. The Correlation of Hydrocarbon Solubility in Water with Solvent Cavity Surface Area. J. Phys. Chem. 1972, 76, 2754-2759.
36. Rechsteiner, C. E. In Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods; Lyman, W. J., Reehl, W. F., Rosenblatt, D. H., Eds.; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1982; Chapter 12.
37. Horvath, A. L. Molecular Design: Chemical Structure Generation from the Properties of Pure Organic Compounds; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1992.
38. Wiener, H. Structural Determination of Paraffin Boiling Points. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1947, 69, 17-20.
39. Katritzky, A. R.; Mu, L.; Lobanov, V. S.; Karelson, M. Correlation of Boiling Points with Molecular Structure. 1. A Training Set of 298 Diverse Organics and a Test Set of 9 Simple Inorganics. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 10400-10407.
40. Katritzky, A. R.; Lobanov, V. S.; Karelson, M. Normal Boiling Points for Organic Compounds: Correlation and Prediction by a Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 28-41.
41. Plavsic, D.; Trinajstic, N.; Amic, D.; Soskic, M. Comparison Between the Structure-Boiling Point Relationship with Different Descriptors for Condensed Benzoids. New J. Chem. 1998, 1075-1078.
42. Bünz, A. P.; Braun, B.; Janowsky, R. Application of Quantitative Structure-Performance Relationship and Neural Network Models for the Prediction of Physical Properties from Molecular Structure. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1998, 37, 3043-3051.
43. Liu. S.; Cao, C.; Li, Z. Approach to Estimation and Prediction for Normal Boiling Point (NBP) of Alkenes Based on a Novel Molecular Distance-Edge (MDE) Vector, λ. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 387-394.
44. Grigoras, S. A Structural Approach to Calculate Physical Properties of Pure Organic Substances: The Critical Temperature, Critical Volume and Related Properties. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 493-510.
45. Stanton, D. T.; Jurs, P. C. Development and Use of Charged Partial Surface Area Structural Descriptors in Computer-Assisted Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Studies. Anal. Chem. 1990, 62, 2323-2329.
46. Stanton, D. T.; Jurs, P. C.; Hicks, M. G. Computer-Assisted Prediction of Normal Boiling Points of Furans, Tetrahydrofurans, and Thiophenes. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1991, 31, 301.
47. Stanton, D. T.; Egolf, L. M.; Jurs, P. C.; Hicks, M. G. Computer-Assisted Prediction of Normal Boiling Points of Pyrans and Pyrroles. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1992, 32, 306-316.
48. Egolf, L. M.; Wessel, M. D.; Jurs, P. C. Prediction of Boiling Points and Critical Temperatures of Industrially Important Organic Compounds from Molecular Structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 947-956.
49. Wessel, M. D.; Jurs, P. C. Prediction of Normal Boiling Points for a Diverse Set of Industrially important Organic Compounds from Molecular Structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1995, 35, 841-850.
50. Basak, A. C.; Gute, B. D.; Grunwaid, G. D. Comparative Study of Topological and Geometrical Parameters in Estimating Normal Boiling Points and Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 1054-1060.
51. Murugan, R.; Grendze, M. P.; Toomey, J. E.; Katritzky, A. R.; Kareison, M.; Lobanov, V.; Rachwal, P. Predicting Physical Properties from Molecular Structure. CHEMTECH 1994, 24, 17-23.
52. Katritzky A. R.; Lobanov, V. S.; Karelson, M.; Murugan, R.; Grendze, M. P.; Toomey, J. E., Jr. Comprehensive Descriptors for Structural and Statistical Analysis. 1. Correlations Between Structure and Physical Properties of Substituted Pyridines. Rev. Roum. Chim. 1996, 41, 851-867.
53. Ivanciuc, O.; Ivanciuc, T.; Balaban, A. T. Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Study of Normal Boiling points for Halogen-/ Oxygen-/Sulfur-Containing Organic Compounds Using the CODESSA Program. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 9129-9142.
54. Cherqaoui, D.; Villemin, D. Use of a Neural Network to Determine the Boiling Point of Alkanes. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1994, 90, 97-102.
55. Cherqaoui, D.; Villemin, D.; Mesbah, A.; Cense, J-M.; Kvasnicka, V. Use of a Neural Network to Determine the Boiling Point of Acyclic Ethers, Peroxides, Acetals and their Sulfur Analogues. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1994, 90, 2015-2019.
56. Balaban, A. T.; Kier, L. B.; Joshi, N. Correlations between Chemical Structure Normal Boiling Points of Acyclic Ethers, Peroxides, Acetals, and Their Sulfur Analogues. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1992, 32, 237-247.
57. Egolf, L. M.; Jurs, P. C. Prediction of Boiling Points of Organic Heterocyclic Compounds Using Regression and Neural Network Techniques. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1993, 33, 616-625.
58. Zhang, R.; Liu, S.; Liu, M.; Hu, Z. Neural Network-Molecular Descriptors Approach to the Prediction of Properties of Alkenes. Comput. Chem. 1997, 21, 335-341.
59. Liu, S.; Zhang, R.; Liu, M.; Hu, Z. Neural Network-Topological Indices Approach to the Prediction of Properties of Alkenes. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 1146-1151.
60. Hall, L. H.; Story, C. T. Boiling Point and Critical Temperature of a Heterogenous Data Set: QSAR with Atom Type Electrotopological State Indices Using Artificial Neural Networks. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 1004-1014.
61. Wessel, M. D.; Jurs, P. C. Prediction of Normal Boiling Points of Hydrocarbons from Molecular Structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1995, 35, 68-76.
62. Gakh, A. A.; Gakh, E. G.; Stumper, B. G.; Noid, D. W. Neural Network-Graph Theory Approach to the Prediction of the Physical Properties of Organic Compound. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 832-839.
63. Katritzky, A. R.; Mu, L.; Karelson, M. Relationship of Critical Temperatures to Calculated Molecular Properties. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 293-299.
64. Turner, B. E.; Costello, C. L.; Jurs, P. C. Prediction of Critical temperatures and Pressure of Industrially Important Organic Compounds from Molecular Structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 639-645.
65. Politzer, P.; Truhiar, D. G. Chemical Applications of Atomic and Molecular Electrostatic Potentials; Plenum Press: New York, 1981.
66. Murray, J. S.; Lane, P.; Brinck, T.; Paulsen, K.; Grice, E.; Politzer, P. Relationship of Critical Constants and Boiling Points to Computed Molecular Surface Properties. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 9369-9373.
67. Katritzky, A. R.; Wang, Y.; Sild, S.; Tamm, T.; Karelson, M. QSPR Studies on Vapor Pressure, Aqueous Solubility and the Prediction of Water-Air Partition Coefficients. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 720-725.
68. Chastrette, M.; Cretin, D.; Tiyal, F.; Structure-Property Relationships: Determination of the Vapour Pressure of Alkanes and Alcohols Using Multifunctional Autocorrelation Method (MAM). C. R. Acad. Sci. II 1994, 318, 1059-1065.
69. Basak, S. C.; Gute, B. D.; Grunwald, G. D. Use of Topostructural, and Topochemical, and Geometrical Parameters in the Prediction of Vapor Pressure: A Hierarchical QSAR Approach. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 651-655.
70. Liang, C.; Gallagher, D. A. QSPR Prediction of Vapor Pressure from Solely Theoretically-Derived Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 321-324.
71. Egolf, L. M.; Jurs, P. C. Estimation of Autignition Temperatures of Hydrocarbons, Alcohols, and Esters from Molecular Structure. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1992, 31, 1798-1807.
72. Mitchell, B. E.; Jurs, P. C. Prediction of Autoignition Temperatures of Organic Compounds from Molecular Structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 538-547.
73. Tetteh, J.; Metcalfe, E.; Howells, S. L. Optimization of radial basis and backpropagation neural networks for modelling auto-ignition temperature by quantitative-structure property relationships. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1996, 32, 177-191.
74. Tetteh, J.; Howells, S.; Metcalfe, E.; Suzuki, T. Optimization of Radial Basis Function Neural Networks Using Biharmonic Spline Interpolation. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 1998, 41, 17-29.
75. Karelson, M.; Perkson, A. The Correlation and Prediction of Densities of Organic Liquids, Comput. Chem. 1999, 23, 49-59.
76. Katritzky, A. R.; Sild, S.; Karelson, M. A General QSPR Treatment of the Refractive Index of Organic Compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 840-844.
77. Katritzky, A. R.; Maran, U.; Karelson, M.; Lobanov, V. S. Prediction of Melting Points for the Substituted Benzenes: A QSPR Approach. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 913-919.
78. Charton, M.; Charton, B.; Quantitative Description of Structural Effects on Melting Points of Substituted Alkanes. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1994, 7, 196-206.
79. Gramatica, P.; Navas, N.; Todeschini, R. 3D-Modelling and Prediction by WHIM Descriptors. Part 9. Chromatographic Relative Retention Time and Physico-Chemical Properties of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs). Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 1998, 40, 53-63.
80. oct from Structures. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 1281-1306.
81. Sangster, J. Octanol-Water Partition Coefficients: Fundamentals and Physical Chemistry; John Wiley: Chichester, 1997; Vol. 2.
82. Mannhold, R.; Rekker, R. F.; Dross, K.; Bijloo, G.; de Vries, G. The Lipophilic Behaviour of Organic Compounds: 1. An Updating of the Hydrophobic Fragmental Constant Approach. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1998, 17, 517-536.
83. Buchwald, P.; Bodor, N. Octanol-Water Partition: Searching for Predictive Models. Curr. Med. Chem. 1998, 5, 353-380.
84. Fujita, T.; Iwasa, J.; Hansch, C. A New Substituent Constant, pi, Derived From Partition Coefficients. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 5175-5180.
85. Nys, G. G.; Rekker, R. F. Statistical Analysis of a Series of Partition Coefficients with Special Reference to the Predictability of Folding of drug Molecules. Introduction of Hydrophobic Fragmental Constants (f-values). Chim. Ther. 1973, 8, 521-535.
86. Nys, G. G.; Rekker, R. F. The Concept of Hydrophobic Fragmental Constants (f-values). II. Extension of its Applicability to the Calculation of Lipophilicities of Aromatic and Hetero-Aromatic Structures. Chim. Ther. 1974, 9, 361-375.
87. Rekker, R. F.; de Kort, H. M. The Hydrophobic Fragmental Constant; An Extension to a 1000 Data Point Set. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1979, 14, 479-488.
88. Rekker, R. F.; Mannhold, R. Calculation of Drug Lipohilicity. The Hydrophobic Fragmental Constant Approach; VCH: Weinheim 1992.
89. Hansch, C.; Leo, A. J. Substituent Constants for Correlation Analysis in Chemistry and Biology; John Wiley: New York, 1979.
90. Leo, A. J. In Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry; Ramsden, C. A., Ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1990; Vol. 4, pp 295-319.
91. Broto, P.; Moreau, G.; Vandycke, C. Molecular Structures, Perception, Autocorrelation Descriptor and SAR Studies; System of Atomic Contributions for the Calculation of the Octanol-Water Partition Coefficient. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1984, 19, 71-78.
92. Ghose, A. K.; Crippen, G. M. Atomic Physicochemical Parameters for Three Dimensional Structure Directed Quantitative Structure-Activity relationships. I. Partition Coefficients as a Measure of Hydrophobicity. J. Comput. Chem. 1986, 7, 565-577.
93. Ghose, A. K.; Pritchett, A.; Crippen, G. M. Atomic Physicochemical Parameters for Three Dimensional Structure Directed Quantitative Structure-Activity relationships. III. Modeling Hydrophobic Interactions. J. Comput. Chem. 1988, 9, 80-90.
94. Viswanadhan, V. N.; Ghose, A. K.; Revankar, G. R.; Robins, R. K. Atomic Physicochemical Parameters for Three Dimensional Structure Directed Quantitative Structure-Activity relationships. 4. Additional Parameters for Hydrophobic and Dispersive Interactions and Their Application for an Automated Superposition of Certain Naturally Occurring Nucleoside Antibiotics. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1989, 29, 163-172.
95. Ghose, A. K.; Viswanadhan, V. N.; Wendoloski, J. J. Prediction of Hydrophobic (Lypophilic) Properties of Small Organic Molecules Using Fragmental Methods: An Analysis of ALOGP and CLOGP Methods. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 3762-3772.
96. Suzuki, T.; Kudo, Y. Automated log P Estimation Based on Combined Additive Modeling Methods. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1990, 4, 155-198.
97. Wang, R.; Fu, Y.; Lai, L. A New Atom-Additive Method for Calculating Partition Coefficients. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 615-621.
98. Klopman, G.; Wang, S. A Computer Automated Structure Evaluation (CASE) Approach to Calculation of Partition Coefficient. J. Comput. Chem. 1991, 12, 1025-1032.
99. Klopman, G.; Li, J.-Y.; Wang, S.; Dimayuga, M. Computer Automated log P Calculation Based on Extended Group Contribution Approach. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 752-781.
100. Meylan, W. M.; Howard, P. H. Atom/Fragment Contribution Method for Estimating Octanol-Water Partition Coefficients. J. Pharm. Sci. 1995, 84, 83-92.
101. Kamlet, M. J.; Abboud, J. L.; Taft, R. W. The Solvatochromic Comparison Method. 6. The π* Scale of Solvent Polarities. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 6027-6038.
102. Kamlet, M. J.; Abboud, J. L.; Abraham, M. H.; Taft, R. W. Linear Solvation Energy Relationship. 23. A Comprehensive Collection of the Solvatochromic Parameters, π*, α and β and Some Methods for Simplifying the Generalized Solvatochromic Equation. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 2877-2887.
103. Kamlet, M. J.; Doherty, R. M.; Carr, P.; Abraham, M. H.; Marcus, Y.; Taft, R. W. Linear Solvation Energy Relationships. 46. An Improved Equation for Correlation and Prediction of Octanol/Water Partition Coefficients of Organic Non-Electrolytes (Including Strong Hydrogen Bond Donor Solutes). J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 5244-5255.
104. Luehrs, D. C.; Hickey, J. P.; Godbole, K. A.; Rogers, T. N. Estimation of Octanol/Water Partition Coefficients Using LSER Parameters. Adv. Environ. Res. 1998, 2, 181-185.
105. Famini, G. R. Using Theoretical Descriptors in Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships; V.CRDEC-TR-085; U.S. Army Chemical Research, Development and Engineering Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, 1989.
106. Famini, G. R.; Penski, C. A.; Wilson, L. Y. Using Theoretical Descriptors in Quantitative Structure Activity Relationships: Some Physicochemical Properties. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1992, 5, 395-405.
107. Camilleri, P.; Watts, S. A.; Boraston, J. A. A Surface Area Approach to Determination of Partition Coefficients. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1988, 1699-1707.
108. Masuda, T.; Jikihara, T.; Nakamura, K.; Kimura, A.; Takagi, T.; Fujiwara, H. Introduction of Solvent-Accessible Surface Area in the Calculation of the Hydrophobicity Parameter log P from an Atomistic Approach. J. Pharm. Sci. 1997, 86, 57-63.
109. Brinck, T.; Murray, J. S.; Politzer, P. Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient Expressed in Terms of Solute Molecular Surface Areas and Electrostatic Potentials. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 7070-7073.
110. Murray, J. S.; Brinck, T.; Lane, P.; Paulsen, K.; Politzer, P. Statistically-Based Interaction Indexes Derived from Molecular-Surface Electrostatic Potentials - A General Interaction Properties Function (GIPF). J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM 1994, 307, 55-64.
111. Du, Q.; Arteca, G. A. Modeling Lipophilicity from the Distribution of Electrostatic Potential on a Molecular Surface. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1996, 10, 133-144.
112. Sasaki, Y.; Kubodera, H.; Matuszaki, T.; Umeyama, H. Prediction of Octanol/Water Partition Coefficients Using Parameters Derived from Molecular Structures. J. Pharmacobiol.-Dyn. 1991, 14, 207-214.
113. Klopman, G.; Iroff, L. D. Calculation of Partition Coefficients by the Charge Density Method. J. Comput. Chem. 1981, 2, 157-160.
114. Klopman, G.; Namboordiri, K.; Schochet, M. Simple Method of Computing the Partition Coefficient. J. Comput. Chem. 1985, 6, 28-38.
115. Bodor, N.; Gabanyi, Z.; Wong, C.-K. A New Method for the Estimation of Partition Coefficient. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 3783-3786.
116. Bodor, N.; Huang, M. J. An Extended Version of a Novel Method for the Estimation of Partition Coefficients. J. Pharm. Sci. 1992, 81, 272-281.
117. Kantola, A.; Villar, H. O.; Loew, G. H. Atom Based Parametrization for a Conformationally Dependent Hydrophobic Index. J. Comput. Chem. 1991, 12, 681-689.
118. Moriguchi, I.; Hirono, S.; Liu, Q.; Nakagome, I.; Matsushita, Y. Simple Method of Calculating Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1992, 40, 127-130.
119. Moriguchi, I.; Hirono, S.; Nakagome, I.; Hirano, H. Comparison of Reliability of log P Values for Drugs Calculated by Several Methods. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1994, 42, 976-978.
120. Grombar, V. K.; Enslein, K. Assessment of n-Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient: When Is the Assessment Reliable? J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 1127-1134.
121. Bodor; N.; Buchwald, P. Molecular Size Based Approach To Estimate Partition Properties for Organic Solutes. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 3404-3412.
122. Edward, J. T. Calculation of Octanol-Water Partition Coefficients of Organic Solutes from Their Molecular Volumes. Can. J. Chem. 1998, 76, 1294-1303.
123. Waller, C. L. A Three-Dimensional Technique for the Calculation of Octanol-Water Partition Coefficients. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1994, 13, 172-176.
124. oct) Using a Combination of Semiempirical Self-Consistent Reaction Field Calculations and Neural Networks. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1995, 35, 905-911.
125. Breindl, A.; Beck, B.; Clark, T.; Glen, R. C. Prediction of the n-Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient, log P, Using a Combination of Semiempirical MO-calculations and a Neural Network. J. Mol. Model. 1997, 3, 142-155.
126. Devillers, J. Neural Networks in QSAR and Drug Design; Academic Press: London, 1996.
127. Rekker, R. F.; ter Laak, A. N.; Mannhold, R. On the Reliability of Calculated log P-values: Rekker, Hansch/Leo and Suzuki Approach. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1993, 12, 152-157.
128. Mannhold, R.; Rekker, R. F.; Sonntag, C.; ter Laak, A. N.; Dross, K.; Polymeropoulos, E. Comparative Evaluation of the Predictive Power of Calculation Procedures for Molecular Lipophilicity. J. Pharm. Sci. 1995, 84, 1410-1419.
129. Mannhold, R.; Dross, K. Calculation Procedures for Molecular Lipophilicity: a Compartive Study. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1996, 15, 403-409.
130. Hansch, C.; Quinlan, J. E.; Lawrence, G. L. The Linear Free-Energy Relationship between Partition Coefficients and the Aqueous Solubility of Organic Liquids. J. Org. Chem. 1968, 33, 347-350.
131. Banerjee, S.; Yalkowsky, S. H.; Valvani, S. C. Water Solubility and Octanol/Water Partition Coefficients of Organics. Limitations of the Solubility-Partition Coefficient Correlation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1980, 14, 1227-1229.
132. Mackay, D.; Bobra, A.; Shiu, W. Y.; Yalkowsky, S. H. Relationships between Aqueous Solubility and Octanol-Water Partition Coefficients. Chemosphere 1980, 9, 701-712.
133. Miller, M. M.; Waslk, S. P.; Huang, G. L.; Shiu, W. Y.; Mackay, D. Relationships between Octanol-Water Partition Coefficient and Aqueous Solubility. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1985, 19, 522-529.
134. Yalkowsky, S. H.; Valvani, S. C. Solubilities and Partitioning 2. Relationships between Aqueous Solubilities, Partition Coefficients, and Molecular Surface Areas of Rigid Aromatic Hydrocarbons. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1979, 24, 127-129.
135. Isnard, P.; Lambert, S. Aqueous Solubility and n-Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient Correlations. Chemosphere 1989, 18, 1837-1853.
136. Krop, H. B.; van Velzen, M. J. M.; Parsons, J. R.; Govers, H. A. J. n-Octanol-Water Partition Coefficients, Aqueous Solubilities, and Henry's Law Constants of Fatty Acid Esters. Chemosphere 1997, 34, 107-119.
137. Yalkowsky, S. H.; Banerjee, S. Aqueous Solubility. Methods of Estimation for Organic Compounds; Dekker: New York, 1992.
138. Yalkowsky, S. H.; Orr, R. J.; Valvani, S. C. Solubility and Partitioning. 3. The Solubility of Halobenzenes in Water. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 1979, 18, 351-353.
139. Dunnivant, F. M.; Elzerman, A. W.; Jurs, P. C.; Hasan, M. N. Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships for Aqueous Solubilities and Henry's Law Constants of Polychlorinated Biphenyls. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1992, 26, 1567-1573.
140. Amidon, G. L.; Yalkowsky, S. H.; Anik, S. T.; Valvani, S. C. Solubility of Nonelectrolytes in Polar Solvents. V: Estimation of the Solubility of Aliphatic Monofunctional Compounds in Water Using a Molecular Surface Area Approach. J. Phys. Chem. 1975, 79, 2239-2246.
141. Kamlet, M. J.; Doherty, R. M.; Abraham, M. H.; Carr, P. W.; Doherty, R. F.; Taft, R. W. Linear Solvation Energy Relationships. 41. Important Differences between Aqueous Solubility Relationships for Aliphatic and Aromatic Solutes. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 1996-2004.
142. Yalkowsky, S. H. Estimation of the aqueous solubility of complex organic compounds. Chemosphere 1993, 26, 1239-1261.
143. Klopman, G.; Wang, S.; Balthasar, D. M. Estimation of aqueous solubility of organic molecules by the group contribution approach. Application to the study of biodegradation. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1992, 32, 474-482.
144. Suzuki, T. Development of an Automatic Estimation System for Both the Partition Coefficient and Aqueous Solubility. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1991, 5, 149-166.
145. Myrdal, P. B.; Manka, A. M.; Yalkowsky, S. H. AQUAFAC 3: Aqueous Functional Group Activity Coefficients; Application to the Estimation of Aqueous Solubility. Chemosphere 1995, 30, 1619-1637.
146. Nirmalakhandan, N. N.; Speece, R. E. Prediction of Aqueous Solubility of Organic Chemicals Based on Molecular Structure. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1988, 22, 328-338.
147. Li, A.; Doucette, W. J.; Andren, A. W. Estimation of Aqueous Solubility, Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient, and Henry's Law Constant for Polychlorinated Biphenyis Using UNIFAC. Chemosphere 1994, 79, 657-669.
148. Kan, A. T.; Tomson, M. B. UNIFAC Prediction of Aqueous and Nonaqueous Solubilities of Chemicals with Environmental Interest. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30, 1369-1376.
149. Patil, G. S. Correlation of aqueous solubility and octanol-water partition coefficient based on molecular structure. Chemosphere 1991, 22, 723-738.
150. Patil, G. S. Prediction of aqueous solubility and octanol-water partition coefficient for pesticides based on their molecular structure. J. Hazard. Mater. 1994, 36, 35-43.
151. Bodor, N.; Huang, M.-J. A New Method for the Estimation of the Aqueous Solubility of Organic Compounds. J. Pharm. Sci. 1992, 87, 954-960.
152. Nelson, T. M.; Jurs, P. C. Prediction of Aqueous Solubility of Organic Compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 601-609.
153. Sutter, J. M.; Jurs, P. C. Prediction of Aqueous Solubility for a Diverse Set of Heteroatom-Containing Organic Compounds Using a Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 100-107.
154. Huibers, P. H. T.; Katritzky, A. R. Correlation of Aqueous Solubility of Hydrocarbons and Halogenated Hydrocarbons with Molecular Structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 283-292.
155. Ruelle, P.; Kesselring, U. W. The Hydrophobic Propensity of Water toward Amphiprotic Solutes: Prediction and Molecular Origin of the Aqueous Solubility of Aliphatic Alcohols. J. Pharm. Sci. 1997, 86, 179-186.
156. Ruelle, P.; Kesselring, U. W. Prediction of the Aqueous Solubility of Proton-Acceptor Oxygen-Containing Compounds by the Mobile Order Solubility Model. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1997, 93, 2049-2052.
157. Nouwen, J.; Hansen, B. Correlation Analysis Between Watersolubility, Octanol-water Partition Coefficient and Melting Point Based on Clustering. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1996, 15, 17-30.
158. Bodor, N.; Harget, A.; Huang, M. Neural Network Studies. 1. Estimation of the Aqueous Solubility of Organic Compounds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 9480-9483.
159. Bodor, N.; Huang, M.; Harget, A. Neural Network Studies. 4. An Extended Study of the Aqueous Solubility of Organic Compounds. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry: Quantum Chemistry Symposium Vol. 26; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1992; pp 853-867.
160. Huuskonen, J.; Salo, J.; Taskinen, J. Neural Network Modeling for Estimation of the Aqueous Solubility of Structurally Related Drugs. J. Pharm. Sci. 1997, 86, 450-454.
161. Huuskonen, J.; Salo, J.; Taskinen, J. Aqueous Solubility Prediction of Drugs Based on Molecular Topology and Neural Network Modeling. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 450-456.
162. Mitchell, B. E.; Jurs, P. C. Prediction of Aqueous Solubility of Organic Compounds from Molecular Structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38 489-496.
163. Mackay, D.; Shiu, W. Y. A Critical Review of Henry's Law Constants for Chemicals of Environmental Interest. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1981, 10, 1175-1199.
164. Abraham, M. H.; Andonian-Haftvan, J.; Whiting, G. S.; Leo, A.; Taft, R. S. Hydrogen Bonding. Part 34. The Factors that Influence the Solubility of Gases and Vapours in Water at 298 K, and a New Method for its Determination. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1994, 1777-1791.
165. Staudinger, J.; Roberts, P. V. A Critical Review of Henry's Law Constants for Environmental Applications. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 26, 205-297.
166. Hine, H.; Mookerjee, P. K. The Intrinsic Hydrophilic Character of Organic Compounds. Correlations in Terms of Structural Contributions. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 292-298.
167. Cabani, S.; Gianni, P.; Mollica, V.; Lepori, L. Group Contributions to the Thermodynamic Properties of Non-Ionic Organic Solutes in Dilute Aqueous Solution. J. Solution Chem. 1981, 10, 563-595.
168. Nirmalakhandan, N. N.; Speece, R. E. QSAR Model for Predicting Henry's Constant. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1988, 22, 1349-1357.
169. Horvath, A. L. Halogenated Hydrocarbons; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1982.
170. Russell, C. J.; Dixon, S. L.; Jurs, P. C. Computer-Assisted Study of the Relationship Between Molecular Structure and Henry's Law Constant. Anal. Chem. 1992, 64, 1350-1355.
171. Katritzky, A. R.; Mu, L.; Karelson, M. A QSPR Study of the Solubility of Gases and Vapors in Water. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 1162-1168.
172. Reichardt, C. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry, 2nd ed.; VCH: Weinheim, 1988.
173. Koppel, I. A.; Palm, V. A. The Influence of the Solvent on Organic Reactivity. In Advances in Linear Free Energy Relationships; Chapman, N. B., Shorter, J., Eds.; Plenum Press: London, 1972; pp 203-280.
174. Sandström, M.; Persson, I.; Persson, P. A Study of Solvent Electron-Pair Donor Ability and Lewis Basicity Scales. Acta Chem. Scand. 1990, 44, 653-675.
175. Marcus, Y. The Properties of Organic Liquids that are Relevant to their Use as Solvating Solvents. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1993, 409-416.
176. Politzer, P., Murray, J. S., Eds. Quantitative Treatments of Solute/ Solvent Interactions Theoretical and Computational Chemistry; Elsevier: New York, 1994.
177. Katritzky, A. R.; Mu, L.; Karelson, M. QSPR Treatment of the Unified Nonspecific Solvent Polarity Scale. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 756-761.
178. Mu, L.; Drago, R. S.; Richardson, D. E. A Model Based QSPR Analysis of the Unified non-specific solvent polarity scale. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1998, 159-167.
179. Katritzky, A. R.; Tamm, T.; Wang, Y.; Sild, S.; Karelson, M. QSPR Treatment of Solvent Polarity Scale. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 684-691.
180. Katritzky, A. R.; Tamm, T.; Wang, Y.; Karelson, M. A Unified Treatment of Solvent Polarity J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 692-698.
181. Eiceman, A. G.; Herbert, H. H, Jr. Gas Chromatography. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 321R-339R.
182. Bartle, K. D.; Lee, M. L.; Wise, S. A. Factors Affecting the Terention of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Gas Chromatography. Chromatographia 1981, 14, 69-72.
183. Whalen-Pedersen, E. K.; Jurs, P. C. Calculation of Linear Temperature Programmed Capillary Gas Chromatographic Retention Indices of Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds. Anal. Chem. 1981, 53, 2184-2187.
184. Doherty, P. J.; Hoes, R. M.; Robbat, A., Jr.; White, C. M. Relationship between Gas Chromatographic Retention Indices and Molecular Connectivities of Nitrated Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Anal. Chem. 1984, 56, 2697-2701.
185. Mihara, S.; Enomoto, H. Calculation of Retention Indices of pyrazines on the basis of molecular structure. J. Chromatogr. 1985, 324, 428-430.
186. Osmialowski, K.; Halkiewicz, J.; Radecki, A.; Kaliszan, R. Quantum Chemical Parameters in Correlation Analysis of Gas-Liquid Chromatographic Retention Indices of Amines. J. Chromatogr. 1985, 346, 53-60.
187. Osmialowski, K.; Halkiewicz, J.; Kaliszan, R. Quantum Chemical Parameters in Correlation Analysis of Gas-Liquid Chromatographic Retention Indices of Amines. II. Topological electronic index. J. Chromatogr. 1986, 361, 63-69.
188. Rohrbaugh, R. H.; Jurs, P. C. Prediction of Gas Chromatographic Retention Indexes of Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds and Nitrated Polycyclic Aromatic
189. Mihara, S.; Masuda, H. Correlation Between Molecular Structures and Retention Indices of Pyrazines. J. Chromatogr. 1987, 402, 309-317.
190. Rohrbaugh, R. H.; Jurs, P. C. Prediction of Gas Chromatographic Retention Indexes for Diverse Drug Compounds. Anal. Chem. 1988, 60, 2249-2253.
191. Robbat, A.; Jr., Xyrafas, G.; Marshall, D. Prediction of Gas Chromatographic Retention Characteristic of Polychlorinated Biphenyls. Anal. Chem. 1988, 60, 982-985.
192. Heinzen, V. E. F.; Yunes, R. A. Using Topological Indices in the Prediction of Gas Chromatographic Retention Indices of Linear Alkylbenzene Isomers. J. Chromatogr., A 1996, 719, 462-467.
193. Payares, P.; Diaz, D.; Olivero, J.; Vivas, R.; Gomez, I. Prediction of the Gas Chromatographic Retention Times of Flavonoids from Molecular Structure. J. Chromatogr., A 1997, 771, 213-219.
194. Zenkevich, I. G. Principle of Structural Analogy in the Calculation of Gas-Chromatographic Retention Indexes from Physico-Chemical Properties of Organic Compounds. J. Anal. Chem. 1998, 53, 35-40.
195. Michotte, Y.; Massart, D. L. Molecular connectivity and retention indexes. J. Pharm. Sci. 1977, 66, 1630-1632.
196. Bonchev, D.; Mekenjan, O.; Protic, G.; Trinajstic, N. Application of Topological Indices to Gas Chromatographic Data: Calculation of the Retention Indices of Isomeric Alkylbenzenes. J. Chromatogr. 1979, 176, 149-156.
197. Kier, L. B.; Hall, L. H. Molecular Connectivity Analysis of Structure Influencing Chromatographic Retention Indices. J. Pharm. Sci. 1979, 68, 120-122.
198. Duvenbeck, Ch.; Zinn, P. List Operations on Chemical Graphs. 3. Development of Vertex and Edge Models for Fitting Retention Index Data. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1993, 33, 211-219.
199. Duvenbeck, Ch.; Zinn, P. List Operations on Chemical Graphs. 4. Using Edge Models for Prediction of Retention Index Data. J. Chem. Inf Comput. Sci. 1993, 33, 220-230.
200. Stanton, D. T.; Jurs, P. C. Computer-Assisted Prediction of Gas Chromatographic Retention Indices of Pyrazines. Anal. Chem. 1989, 61, 1328-1332.
201. Georgakopoulos, C. G.; Kiburis, J. C.; Jurs, P. C. Prediction of Gas Chioomatographic Relative Retention Times of Stimulants and Narcotics. Anal. Chem. 1991, 63, 2021-2024.
202. Georgakopoulos, C. G.; Tsika, O. G.; Kiburis, J. C.; Jurs, P. C. Prediction of Gas-Chromatographic Relative Retention Times of Anabolic-Steroids. Anal. Chem. 1991, 63, 2025-2028.
203. Buydens, L.; Massart, D. L.; Geerlings, P. Prediction of Gas Chromatographic Retention Indexes with Topological, Physicochemical, and Quantum-Chemical Parameters. Anal. Chem. 1983, 55, 738-744.
204. Katritzky, A. R.; Ignatchenko, E. S.; Barcock, R. A.; Lobanov, V. S.; Karelson, M. Prediction of Gas Chromatographic Retention Times and Response Factors Using a General Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Treatment. Anal. Chem. 1994, 66, 1799-1807.
205. Lucic, B.; Trinajstic, N.; Sild, S.; Karelson, M.; Katritzky, A. R. A New Efficient approach for Variable Selection Based on Multi-regression: Prediction of Gas Chromatographic Retention Times and Response Factors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 610-621.
206. Donovan W. H.; Famini, G. R. Using Theoretical Descriptors in Structure-Activity Relationships: Retention Indices of Sulfur Vesicans and Related Compounds. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1996, 83-89.
207. Woloszyn, T. F.; Jurs, P. C. Quantitative Structure-Retention Relationship Studies of Sulfur Vesicans. Anal. Chem. 1992, 64, 3059-3063.
208. Bruchmann, A.; Zinn, P.; Haffer, Chr. M. Prediction of Gas Chromatographic Retention Index Data by Neural Networks. Anal. Chim. Acta 1993, 283, 869-880.
209. Sutter, J. M.; Peterson, T. A.; Jurs, P. C. Prediction of Gas Chromatographic Retention Indices of Alkylbenzenes. Anal. Chim. Acta 1997, 342, 113-122.
210. Pompe, M.; Razinger, M.; Novic, M.; Veber, M. Modelling of Gas Chromatographic Retention Indices Using Counterpropagation Neural Networks. Anal. Chim. Acta 1997, 348, 215-221.
211. Kohonen, T. Self-Organization and Associative Memory. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1988.
212. Pompe, M.; Novic, M. Prediction of Gas-Chromatographic Retention Indices Using Topological Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 59-67.
213. Scanlon, J. T.; Willis, D. E. Calculation of Flame Ionization Detector Relative Response Factors Using the Effective Carbon Number Concept. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1985, 23, 333-340.
214. Jelali-Heravi, M.; Fatemi, M. H. Prediction of Flame Ionization Detector Reponse Factors Using an Artificial Neural Network. J. Chromatogr., A 1998, 825, 161-169.
215. Huibers, P. D. T.; Lobanov, V. S.; Katritzky, A. R.; Shah, D. O.; Karelson, M. Prediction of Critical Micelle Concentration Using a Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Approach. I. Nonionic Surfactants. Langmuir 1996, 12, 1462-1470.
216. Huibers, P. D. T.; Lobanov V. S.; Katritzky, A. R.; Shah, D. O.; Karelson, M. Prediction of Critical Micelle Concentration Using a Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Approach. 2. Anionic Surfactants. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1997, 187, 113-120.
217. Huibers, P. D. T.; Shah, D. O., Katritzky, A. R. Predicting Surfactant Cloud Point from Molecular Structure. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1997, 193, 132-136.
218. Bicerano, J. Prediction of Polymer Properties. 2nd ed.; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, 1996.
219. Katritzky, A. R.; Rachwal, P.; Law, K. W.; Karelson, M.; Lobanov, V. S. Prediction of Polymer Glass Transition Temperatures Using a General Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Treatment. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 879-884.
220. Katritzky, A. R.; Sild, S.; Lobanov, V. S.; Karelson, M. Quantitative Structure-Property (QSAR) Correlation of Glass Transition Temperatures of High Molecular Weight Polymers. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 300-304.
221. Camelio, P.; Lazzeri, V.; Waegell, B. QSPR in Polymers: A Straightforward New Approach to Calculate the Glass Transition Temperature. Polym. Repr. Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Polym. Chem. 1995, 36, 661-662.
222. Tan, T. T. M.; Rode, B. M. Molecular modelling of polymers 3. Prediction of Glass Transition Temperatures of Poly(acrylic acid), Poly(methacrylic acid) and polyacrylamide derivatives. Macromol. Theor. Simulat. 1996, 5, 467-475.
223. Cypcar, C. C.; Camelio, P.; Lazzeri, V.; Mathias, L. J.; Waegell, B. Prediction of the Glass Transition Temperature of Multicyclic and Bulky Substituted Acrylate and Methacrylate Polymers Using the Energy. Volume, Mass (EVM) QSPR Model. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 8954-8959.
224. Camelio, P.; Cypcar, C. C.; Lazzeri, V.; Waegell, B. A Novel Approach Towards the Prediction of Glass Transition Temperature: Application of the EVM Model, a Designer QSPR Equation for the Prediction of Acrylate and Methacrylate Polymers. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. 1997, 35, 2579-2590.
225. Rogers, D.; Hopfinger, A. J. Application of Generic Function Approximation to Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships and Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 854-866.
226. Luke, B. T. Evolutionary Programming Applied to the Development of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship and Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships. J. Chem. Inf. Comput Sci. 1994, 34, 1279-1287.
227. Ulmer, C. W.; Smith, D. A.; Sumpter, B. G.; Noid, D. I. Computational Neural Networks and the Rational Design of Polymeric Materials: the Next Generation Polycarbonates. Comput. Theor. Polym. 1998, 8, 311-321.
228. Joyce, S. J.; Osguthorpe, D. J.; Padgett, J. A.; Price, G. J.; Neural-Network prediction of Glass-Transition Temperatures from Monomer Structure. J. Chem. Soc., Farady Trans. 1995, 91, 2491-2496.
229. Katritzky, A. R.; Sild, S.; Karelson, M. Correlation and Prediction of the Refractive Indices of Polymers by QSPR. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 1171-1176.
230. Ignatz-Hoover, F.; Katritzky, A. R.; Lobanov, V. S.; Karelson, M. Applications of Semiempirical Molecular Orbital Calculations and Quantitive Structure Property Relations in the Study of Accelerated Sulfur Vulcanization. Rubber Chem. Technol., 1999, in press.