False consensus and the Outgroup Homogeneity Effect: Interference in measurement or intrinsically dependent processes?

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 217-230

  De La Haye, Anne Marie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE POITIERS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035324779     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.59     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bartsch RA, Judd CM. 1993. Majority-minority status and perceived variability revisited. European Journal of Social Psychology 23: 471-483.
2. Brauer M. 2001. Intergroup perception in the social context: the effects of social status and group membership on perceived out-group homogeneity and ethnocentrism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 37: 15-31.
3. Brauer M, Judd CM. 2000. Defining variables in relationship to other variables: when interactions turn out to be main effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 36: 410-423.
4. Cadinu MR, Rothbart M. 1996. Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70: 661-677.
5. Devos T, Comby L, Deschamps JC. 1996. Asymmetries in judgments of in-group and out-group variability. In European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 7), Stroebe W, Hewstone M (eds). Wiley: Chichester; 95-144.
6. Haslam SA, Oakes PJ. 1995. How context-independent is the Outgroup Homogeneity effect? A response to Bartsch and Judd. European Journal of Social Psychology 25: 469-475.
7. Haslam SA, Oakes PJ, Turner JC, McGarty C. 1995. Social categorization and group homogeneity: changes in the perceived applicability of stereotype content as a function of comparative context and trait favourableness. British Journal of Social Psychology 34: 139-160.
8. Haslam SA, Oakes PJ, Turner JC, McGarty C. 1996. Social identity, self-categorization, and the perceived homogeneity of in-groups and out-groups. The interaction between motivation and cognition. In Handbook of Motivation and Cognition (Vol. 3), Sorrentino RM, Higgins ET (eds). Guilford: New York; 182-222.
9. Judd CM, Bartsch RA. 1995. Cats, dogs, and OH effect: a reply to Simon and to Haslam and Oakes. European Journal of Social Psychology 25: 477-480.
10. Krueger J. 1998. On the perception of social consensus. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 30, Zanna MP (ed.). 163-240.
11. Krueger J, Zeiger JS. 1993. Social categorization and the truly false consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65: 670-680.
12. Lorenzi-Cioldi F, Deaux K, Dafflon AC. 1998. Group homogeneity as a function of relative social status. Swiss Journal of Psychology 57: 255-273.
13. Lorenzi-Cioldi F, Eagly AH, Stewart TL. 1995. Homogeneity of gender groups in memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 31: 193-217.
14. Marks G, Miller N. 1987. Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: an empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Review 102: 72-90.
15. Mullen B, Dovidio JF, Johnson C, Copper C. 1992. In-group-out-group differences in social projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 28: 422-440.
16. Mullen B, Hu LT. 1988. Social projection as a function of cognitive mechanisms: two meta-analytic integrations. British Journal of Social Psychology 27: 333-356.
17. Park B, Hastie R. 1987. Perception of variability in category development: instance-versus abstraction-based stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53: 621-635.
18. Park B, Judd CM. 1990. Measures and models of perceived variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59: 173-191.
19. Park B, Judd CM, Ryan CS. 1991. Social categorization and the representation of variability information. In European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 2), Stroebe W, Hewstone M (eds). Wiley: Chichester; 211-245.
20. Park B, Rothbart M. 1982. Perception of out-group homogeneity and levels of social categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42: 1051-1068.
21. Ross L, Greene D, House P. 1977. The false consensus effect: an egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13: 279-301.
22. Ryan CS, Judd CM. 1992. False consensus and out-group homogeneity: a methodological note on their relationship. British Journal of Social Psychology 31: 269-283.
23. Sanders GS, Mullen B. 1983. Accuracy in perceptions of consensus: differential tendencies of people with majority and minority positions. European Journal of Social Psychology 13: 57-70.
24. Scharnitzky P. 1998. La variabilité des groupes sociaux: une revue de question. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale 40: 47-61.
25. Simon B. 1992. The perception of in-group and out-group homogeneity: reintroducing the intergroup context. In European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 3), Stroebe W, Hewstone M (eds). Wiley: Chichester; 1-30.
26. Simon B. 1993. On the asymmetry in the cognitive construal of ingroup and outgroup: A model of egocentric social categorization. European Journal of Social Psychology 23: 131-147.
27. Simon B. 1995. The perception of ingroup and outgroup homogeneity: On the confounding of group size, level of abstractness and frame of reference. European Journal of Social Psychology 25: 463-468.
28. Simon B, Brown R. 1987. Perceived intragroup homogeneity in minority-majority contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53: 703-711.
29. Simon B, Glässner-Bayerl B. Stratenwerth I. 1991. Stereotyping and self-stereotyping in a natural context: the case of heterosexual and homosexual men. Social Psychology Quarterly 54: 252-266.
30. Simon B, Mummendey A. 1990. Perceptions of relative group size and group homogeneity: We are the majority and they are all the same. European Journal of Social Psychology 20: 351-356.
31. Spears R, Manstead ASR. 1990. Consensus estimation in social context. In European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 1), Stroebe W, Hewstone M (eds). Wiley: New York; 81-110.