Coloring single stroop elements: Reducing automaticity or slowing color processing?

Journal of General Psychology

Volumn 128, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 98-112

  Monahan, John S ^a  

^a CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Automaticity; Continuous flow model; Response competition; Stroop effect

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR VISION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; READING;

ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; READING;

EID: 0035220506     PISSN: 00221309     EISSN: 19400888     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221300109598901     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Besner, D., & Stoltz, J. A. (1999a). Unconsciously controlled processing: The Stroop effect reconsidered. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 449-455.
2. Besner, D., & Stoltz, J. A. (1999b).What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 99-104.
3. Besner, D., Stoltz, J. A., & Boutilier, C. (1997). The Stroop effect and the myth of automaticity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 221-225.
4. Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysical investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 529-553.
5. Jared, D., Levy, B. A., & Rayner, K. (1999). The role of phonology in the activation of word meanings during reading: Evidence from proofreading and eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(3), 219-264.
6. Klein, G. S. (1964). Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color-naming. American Journal of Psychology, 77, 576-588.
7. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
8. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
9. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
10. Nealis, P. M. (1973). The Stroop phenomenon: Some critical tests of the response competition hypothesis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 37, 147-153.
11. Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM-PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 20, 206-217.
12. Smith, M. C., Theodor, L., & Franklin, P. E. (1983). On the relationship between contextual facilitation and depth of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 9, 697-712.
13. Stirling, N. (1979). SI: An input and an output phenomenon. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 121-132.
14. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
15. Tzelgov, J., Henik, A., Sneg, R., & Baruch, O. (1996). Unintentional word reading via the phonological route: The Stroop effect with cross script homophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 336-349.
16. van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 47A(3), 631-650.