A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study II. Decisions at the reading and citing stages

Journal of the American Society for Information Science

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 98-114

  Wang, Peiling ^a   White, Marilyn Domas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; DECISION MAKING; DECISION THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ONLINE SEARCHING; ONLINE SYSTEMS;

COGNITIVE MODELS; DOCUMENT SELECTION MODELS;

INFORMATION USE;

EID: 0032800967     PISSN: 00028231     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:2<98::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-L     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Allen, T., & Cohen, S.I. (1969). Information flow in two R & D laboratories. Administrative Science Quarterly, 4, 12-19.
2. Allison, S.T., Jordan, A.M.R., & Yeatts, C.E. (1992). A cluster-analytic approach toward identifying the structure and content of human decision making. Human Relations, 45, 49-72.
3. Barry, C.L. (1994). User-defined relevance criteria: An exploratory study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45, 149-159.
4. Bonzi, S., & Snyder, H.W. (1991). Motivations for citation: A comparison of self citation and citation to others. Scientometrics 21, 245-253.
5. Borgman, C.L. (1990). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. New-berry Park, CA: Sage.
6. Brehmer, B. (1988). The development of social judgment theory. In B. Brehmer, B., & C.R.B. Joyce (Eds.), Human judgment: Vol. 54. The SIT view, advances in psychology, (pp. 13-40). New York: North-Holland.
7. Brooks, T.A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36, 223-229.
8. Brooks, T.A. (1986). Evidence of complex citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37, 34-36.
9. Brunswik, E. (1952). The conceptual framework of psychology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10. Chubin, D.E., & Moitra, S. D. (1975). Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social Studies of Science, 5, 423-441.
11. Peritz, B.C. (1983). A classification of citation roles for the social sciences and related fields. Scientometrics, 5, 303-312.
12. Rees, A.M., & Schultz, D.G. (1967). A field experimental approach to the study of relevance assessments in relation to document searching: Final report. Cleveland, OH: Western Reserve University.
13. Saracevic, T. (1975). Relevance: A review of and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 26, 321-343.
14. Schamber, L. (1991). Users' criteria for evaluation in multimedia information seeking and use situations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Syracuse University.
15. Schamber, L. (1994). Relevance and information behavior. In ME. Williams (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology (pp. 3-48). Medford, NJ: Learned Information, Inc.
16. Schamber, L., Eisenberg, M.B., & Nilan, M.S. (1990). A reexamination of relevance: Toward a dynamic, situational definition. Information Processing and Management, 26, 755-776.
17. Smith, L.C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30, 83-106.
18. Smith, L.C. (1995). ISA and ARIST: Linkages to enhance literature searching. (Unpublished research proposal funded by Information Science Abstracts).