![]() |
Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 6-11
|
Impact of contrast agent type (ionic versus nonionic) used for coronary angiography on angiographic, electrocardiographic, and clinical outcomes following thrombolytic administration in acute myocardial infarction
|
Author keywords
Acute myocardial infarction; Angiography; Contrast agent; Coronary blood flow; Thrombolysis
|
Indexed keywords
ABCIXIMAB;
FIBRINOLYTIC AGENT;
IONIC CONTRAST MEDIUM;
NONIONIC CONTRAST MEDIUM;
RETEPLASE;
TISSUE PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR;
ADULT;
ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY;
ANGIOGRAPHY;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW;
DISEASE DURATION;
ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY;
FEMALE;
FIBRINOLYTIC THERAPY;
HEART EJECTION FRACTION;
HEART INFARCTION;
HUMAN;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
PHASE 1 CLINICAL TRIAL;
PHASE 2 CLINICAL TRIAL;
ST SEGMENT;
THORAX PAIN;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
AGED;
CONTRAST MEDIA;
CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY;
ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION;
STROKE VOLUME;
THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
EID: 0035042459
PISSN: 15221946
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.1121 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (7)
|
References (29)
|