A comparison of ionic versus nonionic contrast medium during primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (GUSTO IIb)

American Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 85, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 692-697

  Batchelor, Wayne B ^a   Granger, Christopher B ^b   Kleiman, Neil S ^c   Phillips, Harry R ^b   Ellis, Stephen G ^d   Betriu, Amadeo ^e   Criger, Doug A ^b   Stebbins, Amanda L ^b   Topol, Eric J ^d   Califf, Robert M ^b  

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e HOSPITAL CLÍNIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IOHEXOL; IONIC CONTRAST MEDIUM; IOPAMIDOL; IOVERSOL; MEGLUMINE IOXAGLATE PLUS SODIUM IOXAGLATE; NONIONIC CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DEATH; DRUG CHOICE; FEMALE; HEART REINFARCTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECURRENT DISEASE; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IOHEXOL; IOPAMIDOL; IOXAGLIC ACID; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; OSMOLAR CONCENTRATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TRIIODOBENZOIC ACIDS;

EID: 0034653317     PISSN: 00029149     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00842-5     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Gabriel D.A., Jones M.R., Reece N.S., Boothroyd E., Bashore T. Platelet and fibrin modification by radiographic contrast media. Circ Res. 68:1991;881-887.
2. Grabowski E.F., Kaplan K.L., Halpern E.F. Anticoagulant effects of nonionic versus ionic contrast media in angiography syringes. Invest Radiol. 26:1991;417-421.
3. Chronos N.A.F., Goodall A.H., Wilson D.J., Sigwart U., Buller N.P. Profound platelet degranulation is an important side effect of some types of contrast media used in interventional cardiology. Circulation. 88:1993;2035-2044.
4. Gasperetti C.M., Feldman M.D., Burwell L.R., Angello D.A., Haugh K.H., Owen R.M., Powers E.R. Influence of contrast media on thrombus formation during coronary angioplasy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 18:1991;443-450.
5. Qureshi N.R., den Heijer P., Crijns H.J. Percutaneous coronary angioscopic comparison of thrombus formation during percutaneous coronary angioplasty with ionic and nonionic low osmolality contrast media in unstable angina. Am J Cardiol. 80:1997;700-704.
6. Mukherjee M., Scully M.F., Thomas M., Jewitt D., Kakkar V.V. The potential thrombogenic action of a nonionic radiographic contrast medium used during coronary angiography is offset by heparin during coronary angioplasty. Thromb Haemost. 76:1996;679-681.
7. Grines C.L., Schreiber T.L., Savas V., Jones D.E., Zidar F.J., Vellappillil G., Brodsky M., Levin R., Safian R., Puchrowicz-Ochocki S., Castellani M.D., O'Neill W.M. A Randomized trial of low osmolar ionic vs. nonionic contrast media in patients with myocardial infarction or unstable angina undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 27:1996;1381-1386.
8. Piessens J.H., Stammen F., Vrolix M.C., Glazier J.J., Benit E., De Geest H., Willems J.L. Effects of an ionic versus a nonionic low osmolar contrast agent on the thrombotic complications of coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 28:1993;99-105.
9. Lembo N.J., King S.B. III, Roubin G.S., Black A.J., Douglas J.S. Jr. Effects of nonionic contrast media on complications of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 67:1991;1046-1050.
10. Esplugas E., Cequier A., Jara F., Mauri J., Soler T., Sala J., Sabate X. Risk of thrombosis during coronary angioplasty with low osmolality contrast media. Am J Cardiol. 68:1991;1020-1024.
11. Malekianpour M., Bonan R., Lesperance J., Gossellin G., Hudon G., Doucet S., Laurier J., Duval D. Comparison of ionic and nonionic low osmolar contrast media in relation to thrombotic complications of angioplasty in patients with unstable angina. Am Heart J. 135:1998;1067-1075.
12. Alexander J.H., Kong D.F., Cantor W.J. Highlights from the 72nd American Heart Association Scientific Sessions November 8 to 11, 1998 . Am Heart J. 137:1999;175-190.
13. Schrader R., Esch I., Ensslen R., Fach W.A., Merle H., Scherer D., Sievert H., Spies H.F., Zeplin H.E. A randomized trial comparing the impact of a nonionic (Iomeprol) versus an ionic (Ioxaglate) low osmolar contrast medium on abrupt vessel closure and ischemic complications after coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 33:1999;395-402.
14. A clinical trial comparing primary coronary angioplasty with tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction. The Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GUSTO IIb) Angioplasty Substudy Investigators. N Engl J Med. 336:1997;1621-1628.
15. The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) trial. N Engl J Med. 312:1985;932-936.
16. Barstad R.M., Buchmann M.S., Hamers M.J.A.G. Effects of ionic and nonionic contrast media on endothelium and on arterial thrombus formation. Acta Radiol. 37:1996;954-961.