|
Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 147-157
|
Diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION;
BILE DUCT STONE;
BILE DUCT TUMOR;
CANCER RISK;
CHOLANGIOGRAPHY;
CHRONIC PANCREATITIS;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMMON BILE DUCT CYST;
COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT;
COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING;
DIAGNOSTIC VALUE;
ECHOGRAPHY;
ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY;
HEALTH CARE AVAILABILITY;
HISTOPATHOLOGY;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY;
NONHUMAN;
PANCREAS INJURY;
PANCREAS TUMOR;
POSTOPERATIVE CARE;
PRIMARY BILIARY CIRRHOSIS;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
REVIEW;
SAMPLING;
SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
TISSUE PREPARATION;
CHOLANGIOGRAPHY;
CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE;
CHOLANGITIS, SCLEROSING;
CHOLEDOCHAL CYST;
CHRONIC DISEASE;
DIGESTIVE SYSTEM DISEASES;
HUMANS;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY;
PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS;
PANCREATITIS;
|
EID: 0034954485
PISSN: 0013726X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-11667 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (78)
|
References (47)
|