Iodinated contrast sensitivity in ERCP

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 95, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 1398-1401

  Draganov, Peter ^a,b   Cotton, Peter B ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CIMETIDINE; DIPHENHYDRAMINE; EPHEDRINE; IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM; PREDNISONE; STEROID;

CHEMOPROPHYLAXIS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DRUG ABSORPTION; DRUG HYPERSENSITIVITY; DRUG SAFETY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; HYPOTENSION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; URTICARIA; VOMITING;

CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CONTRAST MEDIA; DRUG HYPERSENSITIVITY; HUMANS; IODINE RADIOISOTOPES;

EID: 0034082478     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9270(00)00861-3     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Moreira V.F., Merono E., Larraona J.L., et al. ERCP and allergic reactions to contrast media. Gastrointest Endosc. 31:1985;293. (letter).
2. Bilbao M., Dotter C., Lee T., et al. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) A study of 10,000 cases . Gastroenterology. 70:1976;314-320.
3. Gmelin E, Kramann B, Weiss D. Kontrastmittel-swischenfall bei einer endoskopischen retrograded Cholangiopankreatikographie. Munch Med Woschr 1977;119:1439-40.
4. Catalano M.F., Schwartz E. Use of iodine-based contrast during ERCP in patients with iodine allergy. Am J Gastroenterol. 88:1993;1528.
5. Ladas S.D., Rokkas T., Kaskarelis J., et al. Absorption of iodized contrast media during ERCP. Gastointest Endosc. 32:1986;376.
6. Mann K., Rendl J., Busley R., et al. Systemic iodine absorption during endoscopic application of radiographic contrast agents for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography. Eur J Endocrinol. 130:1994;498-501.
7. Sable R.A., Rosenthal W.S., Siegel J., et al. Absorption of contrast medium during ERCP. Am J Dig Dis. 28:1983;801-806.
8. Hopper K., Wegert S.J., Hallgren S.E. Renal excretion of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancretatography ingected contrast A common phenomenon . Invest Radiol. 24:1989;394-396.
9. Roszler M.H., Campbell W.L. Post-ERCP pancreatitis Association with urographic visualization during ERCP . Radiology. 157:1985;595-598.
10. Sahel J., Sarles H. Endoscopic pancreatography and urograms. Gastoenterology. 71:1976;1109.
11. Goldberg H.I., Bilbao M.K., Stewart E.T., et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Radiographic technique . Am J Dig Dis. 21:1976;270-278.
12. Katayama H., Yamaguchi K., Kozuka T., et al. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media A report from the Japanese committee on the safety of contrast media . Radiology. 175:1990;621-628.
13. Greenberger P.A., Patterson R. Adverse reactions to radiocontrast media. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 31:1988;239-248.
14. Greenberger P.A., Patterson R., Tapio C.M. Prophylaxis against repeated radiocontrast media reactions in 857 cases. Arch Intern Med. 145:1985;2197-2200.
15. Barrett B.J., Parfrey P.S., Babasour H.M., et al. A comparison of nonionic, low-osmolality radiocontrast agents with ionic, high-osmolality agents during cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med. 326:1992;431-436.
16. Steinberg E.P., Moore R.D., Powe N.R., et al. Safety and cost effectiveness of high-osmolality as compared with low-osmolality contrast material in patients undergoing cardiac angiography. N Engl J Med. 326:1992;425-430.
17. Hirshfeld J.W. Low-osmolality contrast agents - Who needs them? N Engl J Med. 326:1992;482-484.
18. Jacobson P.D., Rosenquist C.J. The introduction of low-osmolar contrast agents in radiology medical, economic, legal, and public policy issues. JAMA. 260:1988;1586-1592.
19. Hirshfeld JW. Cardiovascular effects of iodinated contrast agents. Am J Cardiol 1990;66:9-17F.
20. Hlatky M.A., Morris K.G., Pieper K.S., et al. Randomized comparison of the cost and effectiveness of iopamidol and diatrizoate as contrast agents for cardiac angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 16:1990;871-877.
21. Shehadi W.H. Adverse reactions to intravenously administered contrast media. Am J Roentgenol. 124:1975;145-152.
22. Witten D.M., Hirsch F.D., Hartman G.W. Acute reactions to urographic contrast media. Am J Roentgenol. 119:1973;832-840.
23. Witten D.M. Reactions to urographic contrast media. JAMA. 231:1975;974-977.
24. Fischer H.W., Doust V.L. An evaluation of pretesting in the problem of serious and fatal reactions to excretory urography. Radiology. 103:1972;497-501.
25. Wolfromm R., Dehouve A., Degard F., et al. Les accidents graves par ingection intraveineuse de substances iodees pour urographie. J Radiol Electr. 47:1966;346-357.
26. Slack J.D., Slack L.A., Orr C. Recurrent severe reaction to iodinated contrast media during cardiac catheterization. Heart Lung. 11:1982;348-352.
27. Cohan R.H., Matsumoto J.S., Quagliano P.V. Manual on contrast media, 4th edition. 1998;American College of Radiology, Reston, VA.
28. Barkin J.S., Casal G.L., Reiner D.K., et al. A comparative study of contrast agents for endoscopic retrograde pancreatography. Am J Gastroenterol. 86:1991;1437-1441.
29. Bedford R.A., Johnson G.K., Geenen J.E., et al. Does the use of non-ionic contrast prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 39:1993;315.
30. Bedford R.A., Johnson G.K., Geenen J.E., et al. Ionic versus non-ionic contrast media Does stepwise therapy influence the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis . Gastroenterology. 104:1994;A294.
31. Osnes M., Skjennald A., Larsen S. A comparison of a new non-ionic (Metrizmide) and a dissociable (Metrizoate) contrast medium in endoscopic retrograde pancreatography. Scand J Gastroenterol. 12:1977;821-825.
32. Kruse A., Brock A., Rodenberg J., et al. Non-ionic versus ionic contrast medium for ERCP. A double blind randomized phase III study of Iopentol versus Amidotrizoate. Endoscopy. 24:1992;641.
33. Dorta G., Uske A., Blum A.L. Meglumine gadoterate A new safe radiocontrast medium for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? Digestion. 58:1997;289-292.