An unnatural amino acid that mimics a tripeptide β-strand and forms β-sheetlike hydrogen-bonded dimers

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 122, Issue 32, 2000, Pages 7654-7661

  Nowick, James S ^a   Chung, De Michael ^a   Maitra, Kalyani ^a   Maitra, Santanu ^a   Stigers, Kimberly D ^a   Sun, Ye ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID DERIVATIVE; BENZOIC ACID DERIVATIVE; DIMER; HYDRAZINE DERIVATIVE; OXALIC ACID DERIVATIVE;

AMINO ACID COMPOSITION; ARTICLE; BETA CHAIN; HYDROGEN BOND; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION;

EID: 0034674963     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja001142w     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Maitra, S.; Nowick, J. S. β-Sheet Interactions Between Proteins. In The Amide Linkage: Structural Significance in Chemistry, Biochemistry, and Materials Science; Greenberg, A., Breneman C. M., Liebman, J. F., Eds.; Wiley: New York, 2000: Chapter 15.
2. Liang, J.; Jaffrey, S. R.; Guo, W.; Snyder, S. H.; Clardy, J. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1999, 6, 735-740.
3. Doyle, D. A.; Lee, A.; Lewis, J.; Kim, E.; Sheng, M.; MacKinnon, R. Cell 1996, 85, 1067-1076.
4. Nassar, N.; Horn, G.; Herrmann, C.; Scherrer, A.; McCormick, F.; Wittinghofer, A. Nature, 1995, 375, 554-560.
5. Kraulis, P. J. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1991, 24, 946-950.
6. Michne, W. F.; Schroeder, J. D. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1996, 47, 2-8.
7. (a) Roberts, J. C.; Pallai, P. V.; Rebek, J., Jr. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 691-694.
8. (b) Boumendjel, A.; Roberts, J. C.; Hu, E.; Pallai, P. V.; Rebek, J., Jr. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 4434-4438.
9. (a) Schrader, T.; Kirsten, C. Chem. Commun. 1996, 2089-2090.
10. (b) Kirsten, C. N.; Schrader, T. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 12061-12068.
11. (a) Smith, A. B., III; Guzman, M. C.; Sprengeler, P. A.; Keenan, T. P., Holcomb, R. C.; Wood, J. L.; Carroll, P. J.; Hirschmann, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 9947-9962.
12. (b) Smith, A. B., III; Hirschmann, R.; Pasternak, A.; Guzman, M. C.; Yokoyama, A.; Sprengeler, P. A.; Darke, P. L.; Emini, E. A.; Schleif, W. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 11113-11123.
13. (c) Smith, A. B., III; Benowitz, A. B.; Sprengeler, P. A.; Barbosa, J.; Guzman, M. C.; Hirschmann, R.; Schweiger, E. J.; Bolin, D. R.; Nagy, Z.; Campbell, R. M.; Cox, D. C.; Olson, G. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9286-9298.
14. (a) Abbenante, G.; March, D. R.; Bergman, D. A.; Hunt, P. A.; Garnham, B.; Dancer, R. J.; Martin, J. L.; Fairlie, D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 10220-10226.
15. (b) March, D. R.; Abbenante, G.; Bergman, D. A.; Brinkworth, R. I.; Wickramasinghe, W.; Begun, J.; Martin, J. L.; Fairlie, D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3375-3379.
16. (c) Reid, R. C.; March, D. R.; Dooley, M. J.; Bergman, D. A.; Abbenante, G.; Fairlie, D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 8511-8517.
17. Janetka, J. W.; Raman, P.; Satyshur, K.; Flentke, G. R.; Rich, D. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 441-442.
18. Zutshi, R.; Franciskovich, J.; Shultz, M.; Schweitzer, B.; Bishop, P.; Wilson, M.; Chmielewski, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 4841-4845.
19. Nowick, J. S.; Smith, E. M.; Pairish, M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1996, 25, 401-415.
20. (a) Kemp, D. S.; Bowen, B. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 5077-5080.
21. (b) Kemp, D. S.; Bowen, B. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 5081-5082.
22. (c) Kemp, D. S.; Bowen, B. R.; Muendel, C. C. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 4650-4657.
23. Nowick, J. S. Acc. Chem. Res. 1999, 32, 287-296.
24. (a) Nowick, J. S.; Smith, E. M.; Noronha, G. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 7386-7387.
25. (b) Nowick, J. S.; Holmes, D. L.; Mackin, G.; Noronha, G.; Shaka, A. J.; Smith, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2764-2765.
26. (c) Nowick, J. S.; Pairish, M.; Lee, I. Q.; Holmes, D. L.; Ziller, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 5413-5424.
27. (d) Holmes, D. L.; Smith, E. M.; Nowick, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 7665-7669.
28. (e) Smith, E. M.; Holmes, D. L.; Shaka, A. J.; Nowick, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7906-7907.
29. (f) Tsai, J. H.; Waldman, A. S.; Nowick, J. S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1999, 7, 29-38.
30. (g) Junquera, E.; Nowick, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 2527-2531.
31. Nowick, J. S.; Tsai, J. H.; Bui, Q.-C. D.; Maitra, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8409-8410.
32. Stigers, K. D.; Koutroulis, M. R.; Chung, D. M.; Nowick, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 3858-3860.
33. (a) Albericio, F.; Barany, G. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1987, 30, 206-216.
34. (b) Albericio, F.; Kneib-Cordonier, N.; Biancalana, S.; Gera, L.; Masada, R. I.; Hudson, D.; Barany, G. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 3730-3743.
35. (a) Jensen, K. J.; Alsina, J.; Songster, M. F.; Vágner, J.; Albericio, F.; Barany, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5441-5452.
36. (b) Alsina, J.; Jensen, K. J.; Albericio, F.; Barany, G. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 2787-2795.
37. (a) Miller, S. C.; Scanlan, T. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2301-2302.
38. (b) Miller, S. C.; Scanlan, T. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 2690-2691.
39. Fukuyama, T.; Jow, C.-K.; Cheung, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 6373-6374.
40. Interestingly, we obtained better coupling of Fmoc*-Hao using DCC and HOBt than using HATU or HATU and HOAt, which are often better peptide coupling agents. For descriptions of HATU and HOAt, see: Carpino, L. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4397-4398.
41. Our experiences suggest that the coupling of Hao is slightly less efficient than that of ordinary amino acids. Double coupling was performed in each step in the synthesis to ensure complete reaction, although it was not clear that it was required.
42. Estep, K. G.; Neipp, C. E.; Stephens Stramiello, L. M.; Adam, M. D.; Allen, M. P.; Robinson, S.; Roskamp, E. J. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 5300-5301.
43. 2 → i-PrCO-Phe-Hao-NHR). This exceptional reactivity of Hao ester derivatives also allows their facile base-promoted hydrolysis and transesterification.
44. (a) Wishart, D. S.; Sykes, B. D.; Richards, F. M. J. Mol. Biol. 1991, 222, 311-333.
45. (b) Wishart, D. S.; Sykes, B. D.; Richards, F. M. Biochemistry 1992, 31, 1647-1651.
46. Wüthrich, K. NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids; Wiley: New York, 1986; pp 125-129.
47. (a) Hwang, T.-L.; Shaka, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 3157-3159.
48. (b) Hwang, T.-L.; Shaka, A. J. J. Magn. Reson., Ser. B 1993, 102, 155-165.
49. Wüthrich, K. NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids; Wiley: New York, 1986; pp 166-168.
50. tot was calculated from the volumes and concentrations of the solutions used in the titration.
51. bound were calculated to be 4.83 and 5.26 ppm, respectively.
52. Interestingly, peptide derivative 9 shows a strong propensity to form dimers in the electrospray mass spectrum, and the relative intensities of the dimer and monomer peaks correlate with the concentration of 9 introduced into the spectrometer.
53. 3 solution.
54. Beijer, F. H.; Kooijman, H.; Spek, A. L.; Sijbesma, R. P.; Meijer, E. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 75-78.
55. (b) Beijer, F. H.; Sijbesma, R. P.; Kooijman, H.; Spek, A. L.; Meijer, E. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6761-6769.
56. Corbin, P. S.; Zimmerman, S. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9710-9711.
57. Gong, B.; Yan, Y.; Zeng, H.; Skrzypczak-Jankunn, E.; Kim, Y. W.; Zhu, J.; Ickes, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5607-5608.
58. Pangborn, A. B.; Giardello, M. A.; Grubbs, R. H.; Rosen, R. K.; Timmers, F. J. Organometallics 1996, 15, 1518-1520.
59. Burfield, D. R.; Smithers, R. H. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 3966-3968.
60. Stewart, J. M.; Young, J. D. Solid-Phase Peptitie Synthesis; Pierce Chemical Company: Rockford, Illinois, 1984; pp 105-106.
61. 2.