Shear bond strengths of one-bottle adhesives to oil-contaminated enamel

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 139-145

  Rosa, Bruno T ^a   Heymann, Harald O ^a   Swift, Edward J ^b   Perdigao, Jorge ^b   Ritter, Andre V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; OIL; ONE STEP DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM; ONE-STEP DENTIN BONDING SYSTEM; OPTIBOND; OPTIBOND SOLO; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PRIME & BOND; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE PLUS; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE PLUS; SINGLE BOND; TENURE QUIK;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; ENAMEL; MATERIALS TESTING; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RANDOMIZATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CATTLE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; OILS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 0034573246     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: 17088240     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00213.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Tjan AHL, Castelnuovo J, Liu P. Bond strength of multi-step and simplified-step systems. Am J Dent 1996; 9:269–272.
2. Finger WJ, Fritz U. Laboratory evaluation of one-component enamel/dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent 1996; 9:206–210.
3. Kanca J. One-Step bond strength to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 1997; 10:5–8.
4. EI-Kalla IH, Garcia-Godoy F. Saliva contamination and bond strength of single-bottle adhesives to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 1997; 10:83–87.
5. Clinical Research Associates. Dentin-resin adhesion, five newest products. CRA Newsletter 1997;21:1–2.
6. Swift EJ, Wilder AD, May KN, Waddell SL. Shear bond strengths of one-bottle adhesives using multiple applications. Oper Dent 1997; 22:194–199.
7. Swift EJ, Bayne SC. Shear bond strength of a new one-bottle dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 1997; 10:184–188.
8. Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Denehy GE. Interfacial morphology and shear bond strength of single-bottle primer/adhesives. Dent Mater 1997; 13:316–324.
9. Swift EJ, Perdigão J, Heymann HO. Enamel bond strengths of “one-bottle” adhesives. Pediatr Dent 1998; 20:259–262.
10. Fritz UB, Finger WJ, Stean H. Salivary contamination during bonding procedures with a one-bottle system. Quintessence Int 1998;29:567–572.
11. Knight JS, Draughn R, Evans MD. Effects of handpiece lubrication on resin-based composite bond strength to enamel. Am J Dent 1999; 12:116–118.
12. Xie J, Powers JM, McGuclcin RS. In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent Mater 1993; 9:295–299.
13. Nakamichi I, Iwaku M, Fusayama T. Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test. J Dent Res 1983; 62:1076–1081.
14. Reifeis PE, Cochran MA, Moore BK. An in vitro shear bond strength study of enamel/dentin bonding systems on enamel. Oper Dent 1995; 20:174–179.
15. Barkmeier WW, Shaffer SE, Gwinnett AJ. Effects of 15- vs. 60-second enamel acid conditioning on adhesion and morphology. Oper Dent 1986; 11:111–116.
16. Gilpatrick RO, Ross JA, Simonsen RJ. Resin-to-enamel bond strengths with various etching times. Quintessence Int 1991; 22:47–49.
17. Munksgaard EC, Irie M, Asmussen E. Dentin-polymer bond promoted by Gluma and various resins. J Dent Res 1985; 64:1409–1411.
18. Retief DH, Mandras RS, Russell CM. Shear bond strength required to prevent microleakage at the dentin-restoration interface. Am J Dent 1994; 7:43–46.
19. Aboush YEY, Tarecn A, Elderton RJ. Resin-to-enamel bonds: effect of cleaning the enamel surface with prophylaxis paste; containing fluoride or oil. Br Dent J 1991; 171:207–209.
20. Tan LS, Lew KKK, Toh SL. Effects of dietary oil contamination and absence of prophylaxis on orthodontic bonding. Eur JOrthod 1997; 19:109–114.
21. Powers JM, Finger WJ, Xie J. Bonding composite resin to contaminated human enamel and dentin. J Prosthodont 1995; 4:28–32.
22. Perdigão J, Lambrcchts P, Van Mcerbeek, B, Tome AR, Vanherle G, Lopes AB. Morphological field emission-SEM study of the effect of six phosphoric acid etching agents on human dentin. Dent Mater 1996;12:262–271.
23. Bottenberg P, Graber H-G, Lampert F. Penetration of etching agents and its influence on sealer penetration into fissures in vitro. Dent Mater 1996; 12:96–102.
24. Osorio R, Toledano M, Cabrcrizo-Vilchcz MA, Rosales JI, Bravo M, Osorio E. Influence of enamel prophylaxis on wettability of three commercially available orthophos-phoric acids. J Biomed Mater Res 1996; 33:269–274.
25. Christensen GJ. Clinical factors affecting adhesion. Oper Dent 1992; 5(Suppl):24–31.
26. Batchelder KF, Richter RS, Vaidyanathan TK. Clinical factors affecting the strength of composite resin to enamel bonds. J Am Dent Assoc 1987; 114:203–205.
27. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Bonding efficiency and interfacial morphology of one-bottle adhesives to contaminated dentin surfaces. Am J Dent 1998; 11:281–285.
28. Vargas MA, Denehy GE, Silbcrman JJ. Bond strength to etched enamel and dentin contaminated with saliva. Am J Dent 1994;7:325–327.