Influence of enamel prophylaxis on wettability of three commercially available orthophosphoric acids

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 269-274

  Osorio, R ^a   Toledano, M ^a   Cabrerizo Vilchez M A ^a   Rosales, J I ^a   Bravo, M ^a   Osorio, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTACT ANGLE; ENAMELS; PHOSPHORIC ACID; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE TENSION; SURFACE TREATMENT; TOPOLOGY; VISCOSITY; WETTING;

AIR POWDER POLISHER; CONTACT ANGLE MEASUREMENTS; ENAMEL; FISSURE SEALANTS; MOLARS; ORTHOPHOSPHORIC ACIDS; PROPHYLAXIS; WETTABILITY; YOUNG EQUATION;

BONE;

PHOSPHORIC ACID; SEALANT;

ARTICLE; CARIES PREVENTION; DENTAL CARIES; ENAMEL; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MOUTH HYGIENE; NORMAL HUMAN; PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY; VISCOSITY; WETTABILITY;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL ENAMEL; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MOLAR, THIRD; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; PIT AND FISSURE SEALANTS; VISCOSITY;

EID: 0030560785     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199624)33:4<269::AID-JBM6>3.0.CO;2-N     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Weintraub, J. The effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants. J. Public Health Dent. 49:317-330; 1989.
2. Raadal, M.; Utkilen, A. B.; Nilsen, O. L. A two year clinical trial comparing the retention of two fissure sealants. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2:77-81; 1991.
3. Buonocore, M. Simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J. Dent. Res. 34: 849-853; 1955.
4. Kanca, J. Bonding to tooth surface structure: a rationale for a clinical protocol. J. Esthet. Dent. 1:100-103; 1989.
5. Retief, D. H. Effect of conditioning the enamel surface with phosphoric acid. J. Dent. Res. 52:333-341; 1973.
6. Gwinnett, A. J.; Buonocore, M. G. Adhesives and caries prevention. Br. Dent. J. 119:77-80; 1965.
7. Gwinnett, A. J. Human prismless enamel and its influence on sealant penetration. Arch. Oral Biol. 18:441-444; 1973.
8. Northeast, S. E. The effect of air-polishing occlusal surfaces on the penetration of fissures by a sealant. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2:157-162; 1992.
9. Combe, E. C. Materiales Dentales. Barcelona: Labor; 1990.
10. Baier, R. E. Principles of adhesion. Oper. Dent. Suppl. 5:S1-S9; 1992.
11. Ruyter, I. E. The chemistry of adhesive agents. Oper. Dent. Suppl. 5:S32-S43; 1992.
12. O'Brien, W. J.; Gunnar, R. Materiales Dentales y su Elección. Buenos Aires: Médica Panamericana; 1980.
13. Jendresen, M. D.; Glantz, P. O. Clinical adhesiveness of selected dental materials. An in vivo study. Acta Odont. Scand. 39:39-45; 1981.
14. Milosevic, A. The influence of surface finish and in vitro pellicle on contact-angle measurement and surface morphology of three commercially available composite restoratives. J. Oral Rehabil. 19:85-97; 1992.
15. Perdok, J. F.; Var Der Mei, H. C.; Genet, M. J.; Rouxhet, P. G.; Busscher, H. J. Elemental surface concentration ratios and surface free energies of human enamel after application of chlorehexidine and adsorption of salivary constituents. Caries Res. 23:297-302; 1989.
16. Shiav, J. Y.; Rasmussen, S. T.; Phelps, A. E.; Enlow, D. H.; Wolf, G. R. Analysis of the "shear" bond strength of pretreated aged composites used in some indirect bonding techniques. J. Dent. Res. 72:1291-1297; 1993.
17. Vogler, E. A. Interfacial Chemistry in Biomaterials Science. New York: Berg&Dekker; 1993.
18. Laurence, R. G.; Barnes, C. H.; Leinfelder, K. F. Applications of the air-powder polisher in clinical orthodontics. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 103:71-73; 1993.
19. Van Dijk, L. J.; Herkströter, F.; Busscher, H. J. Surface free energy and bacterial adhesion. An in vivo study in beagle dogs. J. Clin. Periodontol. 14:300-304; 1987.
20. Cheng, P.; Li, D.; Boruvka, L.; Rotemberg, Y.; Neumann, A. W. Automation of axisymetric drop shape analysis for measurements of interfacial tensions and contact angles. Colloids Surfaces 43:151; 1990.
21. Veres, E. M.; Wolfaardt, J. F.; Becker, P. J. An evaluation of the surface characteristics of a facial prosthetic elastomer. Part III: Wettability and hardness. J. Prosthet. Dent. 63: 466-471; 1990.
22. Rotemberg, Y.; Boruvka, L.; Neumann, A. W. Determination of surface tension and contact angle from the shapes of axisymmetric fluid interfaces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 93: 169-183; 1983.
23. Klokcars, A.; Sax, G. Multiple Comparisons. California: Sage Publications Inc.; 1986.
24. Norusis, M. J. SPSS/PC+ Statistics 4.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc.; 1991.
25. Van Meerbeek, B. V.; Lambrechts, P.; Inokoshi, S.; Braem, M.; Vanherle, G. Factors affecting adhesion to mineralized tissues. Oper. Dent. Suppl. 5:S111-S124; 1992.
26. Walker, M. L.; Vann, W. F. In vitro comparison of primary incisor enamel surfaces etched with an acid solution or acid gel. Pediatr. Dent. 6:209; 1984.
27. Sheykholeslam, Z.; Brandt, S. Some factors affecting the bonding of orthodontic attachments to tooth surfaces. J. Clin. Orthod. 11:734:1977.
28. Fan, P. L.; Seluk, L. W.; O'Brien, W. J. Penetrativity of sealants. J. Dent. Res. 54:262-264; 1975.
29. Brannstromm, M.; Nordenvall, K.; Malmgren, O. The effect of various pre-treatment methods of the enamel in bonding procedures. Am. J. Orthod. 74:522-530; 1978.
30. Garcia-Godoy, F.; Gwinnett, A. J. Penetration of acid solution and gel in occlusal fissures. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 114: 809-810; 1987.
31. Brown, M. R.; Foreman, F. J.; Burgess, J. O.; Summitt, J. B. Penetration of gel and solution etchants in occlusal fissures. J. Dent. Child. 55:265-268; 1988.
32. Burrow, M.; Makinson, O. Pits and fissures: remnant organic debris after acid-etching. J. Dent. Child. 57:348-351; 1990.
33. Brocklehurst, P. R.; Joshi, R. I.; Northeast, S. E. The effect of air-polishing occlusal surfaces on the penetration of fissures by a sealant. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2:157-162; 1992.
34. Christensen, G. J. Clinical factors affecting adhesion. Oper. Dent. Suppl. 5:S24-S31; 1992.
35. Borem, L. M.; Feigal, R. J. Reducing microleakage of sealants under salivary contamination: digital-image analysis evaluation. Quint. Int. 25:283-289; 1994.
36. Baier, R. E.; Shafrin, E. G.; Zisman, W. A. Adhesion: mechanisms that assist or impede it. Science 168:1360-1368; 1970.
37. Miura, F.; Nakagawa, K.; Ishizaki, A. Scanning electron microscope studies on the direct bonding system. Bull. Tokyo Med. Dent. Univ. 20:245-260; 1973.
38. Gwinnett, A. J. Scientific rationale for sealant use and technical aspects of application. J. Dent. Ed. 48:56-59; 1984.
39. Hadavi, F.; Hey, J. H.; Ambrose, E. R.; Louie, P. W.; Shinkewski, D. J. The effect of dentin primer on the shear bond strength between composite resin and enamel. Oper. Dent. 18:61-65; 1993.
40. Donnan, M. F.; Ball, I. A. A double-blind clinical trial to determine the importantce of pumice prophylaxis on fissure sealants retention. Br. Dent. J. 165:283-285; 1988.
41. Baharav, H.; Casdash, H. S.; Pilo, R.; Holft, M. The efficacy of liquid and gel acid etchants. J. Prosthet. Dent. 60:545-547; 1988.
42. Garcia-Godoy, F.; Medlock, J. W. An SEM study of the effects of air polishing on fissure surfaces. Quint. Int. 19: 465-467; 1988.
43. Willman, D.; Norling, B.; Johnson, W. N. A new prophylaxis instrument effect on enamel alterations. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 101:923-925; 1980.
44. Wenzel, R. N. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind. Eng. Chem. 28:988; 1936.
45. Boyde, A. Air polishing effects on enamel, dentine, cement and bone. Br. Dent. J. 156:287-291; 1984.
46. Brockmann, S. L.; Scott, R.; Erick, J. The effect of an air-polishing device on tensile bond strength of a dental sealant. Quint. Int. 20:211-217; 1989.
47. Aboush, Y. E.; Tareen, A.; Elderton, R. J. Resin to enamel bonds: effect of cleaning the enamel surface with prophylaxis pastes containing fluoride or oil. Br. Dent. J. 171:207-209; 1991.
48. Bogert, T. R.; Garcia-Godoy, F. Effect of prophylaxis agents on the shear bond strength of a fissure sealant. Pediatr. Dent. 14:50-51; 1992.