Diagnostic efficiency of three-taxon analysis

Cladistics

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 403-410

  Farris, James S ^a  

^a Box 50007   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS;

EID: 0034465356     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/clad.2000.0138     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Taxic and transformational homology: Different ways of seeing
2. On the three-taxon approach to parsimony analysis
3. Three-taxon statements and phylogeny reconstruction
4. Methods for computing Wagner trees
5. The information content of the phylogenetic system
6. The efficient diagnoses of the phylogenetic system
7. The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis
8. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index
9. Cycles
10. Corroboration versus strongest evidence
11. Paraphyly, outgroups and transformations
12. Explanation
13. A/the brief history of three-taxon analysis
14. Three-taxon transformation in phylogenetic inference: Ambiguity and distortion as regards explanatory power
15. Taxic homology = overall similarity
16. Reply
17. Three-taxon statements: A more precise use of parsimony?
18. Character optimization and weighting: Differences between the standard and three-taxon approaches to phylogenetic inference
19. Is Farris optimization perfect?: Three-taxon statements and multiple branching
20. Recycled
21. Probabilism and phylogenetic inference