Three-taxon statements and phylogeny construction

Cladistics

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 273-289

  Deleporte, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; THREE TAXON STATEMENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 0030417257     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/clad.1996.0021     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. CAMIN, J. H. AND R. R. SOKAL. 1965. A method for deducting branching sequences in phylogeny. Evolution. 19: 311-327.
2. CARPENTER, J. M. 1989. Testing scenarios: wasp social behavior. Cladistics 5: 131-144.
3. CODDINGTON, J. A. 1988. Cladistic test of adaptational hypotheses. Cladistics 4: 3-22.
4. CODDINGTON, J. A. 1990. Bridges between evolutionary pattern and process. Cladistics 6: 379-386.
5. DELEPORTE, P. 1993. Characters, attributes, and tests of evolutionary scenarios. Cladistics 9: 427-432.
6. FARRIS, J. S. 1970. Methods for computing Wagner trees. Syst. Zool. 19: 83-92.
7. FARRIS, J. S. 1983. The logical basis of phylogenetic inference. In: Platnick, N. J. and V. A. Funk (eds), Advances in Cladistics, Vol. 2: Proceedings of the second meeting of the Willi Hennig Society. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 7-36.
8. FITCH, W. M. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: Minimal change for a specific tree topology. Syst. Zool. 20: 406-416.
9. GRANDCOLAS, P., P. DELEPORTE, AND L. DESUTTER. 1994. Why to use phylogeny in evolutionary ecology? Acta Oecologica 15: 661-673.
10. HARVEY, A. W. 1992. Three-taxon statements: more precisely, an abuse of parsimony? Cladistics 8: 345-354.
11. KLUGE, A. G. 1993. Three-taxon transformation in phylogenetic inference: ambiguity and distortion as regards explanatory power. Cladistics 9: 246-259.
12. KLUGE, A. G. AND J. S. FARRIS. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst. Zool. 18: 1-32.
13. NELSON, G. 1992a. Why, after all, must it? Cladistics. 8: 139-146.
14. NELSON, G. 1992b. Reply to Harvey. Cladistics 8: 355-360.
15. NELSON, G. 1993. Reply. Cladistics 9: 261-265.
16. NELSON, G. AND P. Y. LADIGES. 1992. Information content and fractional weight of three taxon statements. Syst. Biol. 41: 490-494.
17. NELSON, G. AND N. I. PLATNICK. 1991. Three-taxon statements: a more precise use of parsimony? Cladistics 7: 351-366.
18. DE PINNA, M. C. C. 1991. Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm. Cladistics 7: 367-394.
19. PLATNICK, N. I. 1993. Character optimization and weighting: differences between the standard and three-taxon approaches to phylogenetic inference. Cladistics 9: 267-272.
20. PLATNICK, N. I., C. E. GRISWOLD, AND J. A. CODDINGTON. 1991. On missing entries in cladistic analysis. Cladistics 7: 337-343.