Compounding and the representation of L2 inflectional morphology

Language Learning

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 153-197

  Murphy, Victoria A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034418110     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9922.00114     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Alegre, M., & Gordon, P. (1999). Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 41-61.
2. Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94-117.
3. Bates, E., & Goodman, J. C. (1997). On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition, aphasia and real-time processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 507-584.
4. Birdsong, D. (1989). Metalinguistic performance and interlinguistic competence. New York: Springer.
5. Birdsong, D. (Ed.). (1999). Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Booij, G. (1989). Complex verbs and the theory of level ordering. In G. Booij & J. van Marie (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology (Vol. 2, pp. 21-30). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Fortis.
7. Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 425-455.
8. Bybee, J., & Slobin, D. (1982). Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language, 58, 265-289.
9. Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of Skinner (1957). Language, 35, 26-58.
10. Clahsen, H. (1995). German plurals in adult second language development: Evidence for a dual-mechanism model of inflection. In L. Eubank, L. Selinker, & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), The current state of interlanguage: Studies in honor of William E. Rutherford (pp.123-137). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
11. Clahsen, H., Marcus, G., & Bartke, S. (1993). Compounding and inflection in German child language. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, 1, 1-31.
12. Clahsen, H., Rothweiler, M., Woest, A., & Marcus, G. (1992). Regular and irregular inflection in the acquisition of German noun plurals. Cognition, 45, 225-255.
13. Daugherty, K. G., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). Beyond rules and exceptions: A connectionist approach to inflectional morphology. In S. D. Lima, R. L. Corrigan & G. K. Iverson (Eds.), The reality of linguistic rules (pp. 353-388). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14. DiSciullo, A., & Williams, E. (1987). On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Educational Testing Service. (1987). Secondary Level English Proficiency Test. Princeton, NJ: Author.
16. Ellis, N. C., & Schmidt, R. (1997). Morphology and longer-distance dependencies: Laboratory research illuminating the A in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 145-171.
17. Eubank, L. (Ed.). (1991). Point counterpoint: Universal grammar in the second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18. Fabb, N. (1988). English suffixation is constrained only by selectional restrictions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, 527-539.
19. Gopnik, M., & Crago, M. (1991). Familial aggregation of a developmental language disorder. Cognition, 21, 73-93.
20. Gordon, P. (1985). Level-ordering in lexical development. Cognition, 21, 73-93.
21. Gordon, P. (1989). Levels of affixation in the acquisition of English morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 519-530.
22. Hannahs, S. J., & Stotko, E. M. (1997). The non-isomorphism of phonological and morphological structure: Evidence from acquisition. In S. J. Hannahs & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Focus on phonological acquisition (pp. 165-180). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
23. Jaeger, J. J., Lockwood, A. H., Kemmerer, D. L., Van Valin, R. D., Murphy, B. W., & Khalak, H. G. (1996). A positron emission tomographic study of regular and irregular verb morphology in English. Language, 72, 451-497.
24. Joanisse, M. F., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1998). Specific language impairment: A deficit in grammar or processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 240-247.
25. Juola, P., & Plunkett, K. (1998). Why double dissociations don't mean much. In M. A. Gernsbacher & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 561-566). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Kim, J. J., Pinker, S., Prince, A., & Prasada, S. (1991). Why no mere mortal has ever flown out to center field. Cognitive Science, 15, 73-218.
27. Kiparsky, P. (1983). From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. In H. Van der Hulst & N. Smith (Eds.), The structure of phonological representations (pp. 131-175). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Foris.
28. Kiparsky, P. (1985). Some consequences of lexical phonology. In C. Ewen & J. Anderson (Eds.), Phonology Yearbook (Vol. 2, pp. 85-138).
29. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
30. Lachter, J., & Bever, T. G. (1988). The relation between linguistic structure and associative theories of language learning - A constructive critique of some connectionist learning models. Cognition, 28, 195-247.
31. Lardiere, D. (1995a). "Differential" treatment of regular vs. irregular inflection in compounds as nonevidence for level-ordering. Second Language Research, 11, 267-269.
32. Lardiere, D. (1995b). L2 acquisition of English synthetic compounding is not constrained by level-ordering (and neither, probably, is L1). Second Language Research, 11, 20-56.
33. Lardiere, D., & Schwartz, B. (1997). Feature-marking in the L2 development of deverbal compounds. Journal of Linguistics, 33, 327-353.
34. Lightbown, P. M. (1983). Acquiring English L2 in Quebec classrooms. In S. Felix & H. Wode (Eds.), Language development at the crossroads. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
35. Lightbown, P. M., Spada, N., & Wallace, R. (1980). Some effects of instruction on child and adolescent ESL learners. In R. Scarcella & S. Krashen (Eds.), Research in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
36. MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676-703.
37. MacWhinney, B., & Leinbach, J. (1991). Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the verb learning model. Cognition, 40, 121-157.
38. Marcus, G. (1995). L2 learners treat regular and irregular inflection differently in compounding. Second Language Research, 11, 88-89.
39. Marcus, G., Brinkmann, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R., & Pinker, S. (1995). German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 189-256.
40. Murphy, V. A. (1997). The effect of modality on a grammaticality judgment task. Second Language Research, 13, 34-65.
41. Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science, 253, 530-535.
42. Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28, 73-193.
43. Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1992). Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammar. In L. A. Sutton, C. Johnson, & R. Shields (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 230-251). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
44. Plunkett, K., & Juola, P. (in press). A connectionist model of English past tense and plural morphology. Cognitive Science.
45. Plunkett, K., & Marchman, V. (1991). U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perceptron: Implications for child language acquisition. Cognition, 38, 43-102.
46. Plunkett, K., & Marchman, V. (1993). From rote learning to system building: Acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition, 48, 21-69.
47. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). On learning the past tense of English verbs. In J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart, & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Schreuder, R., Neijt, A., van der Weide, F., & Baayen, R. H. (1998). Regular plurals in Dutch compounds: Linking graphemes to morphemes? Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 551-573.
49. Seidenberg, M. S. (1992). Connectionism without tears. In S. Davis (Ed.), Connectionism: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50. Seidenberg, M. S., & Hoeffner, J. H. (1998). Evaluating behavioral and neuroimaging data on past tense processing. Language, 74, 104-122.
51. Sereno, J. A., & Jongman, A. (1997). Processing of English inflectional morphology. Memory and Cognition, 25, 425-437.
52. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
53. Tiersma, P. M. (1982). Local and general markedness. Language, 58, 832-849.
54. Tomasello, M. (1995). Language is not an instinct. Cognitive Development, 15, 131-156.
55. White, L. (1989). Universal grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.