Evaluating behavioral and neuroimaging data on past tense processing

Language

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 104-122

  Seidenberg, Mark S ^a   Hoeffner, James H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001320879     PISSN: 00978507     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/lan.1998.0087     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. BARINAGA, MARCIA. 1997. What makes brain neurons run? Science 276.196-98.
2. BERKO, JEAN. 1958. The child's learning of English morphology. Word 14.150-77.
3. BUCKNER, RANDY L.; PETER A. BANDETTINI; KATHLEEN M. OCRAVEN; ROBERT L. SAVOY; STEVEN E. PETERSEN; MARCUS E. RAICHLE; and BRUCE R. ROSEN. 1996. Detection of cortical activation during averaged single trials of a cognitive task using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 93.14 878-83.
4. BYBEE, JOAN. 1985. Morphology. Philadelphia: Johns Benjamins.
5. _, and C. L. MODER. 1983. Morphological classes as natural categories. Language 59.251-70.
6. _, and DAN I. SLOBIN. 1982. Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language 58.265-89.
7. COLTHEART, MAX; BRENT CURTIS; PAUL ATKINS; and MICHAEL HALLER. 1993. Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed approaches. Psychological Review 100.589-608.
8. CRAIK, FERGUS I. M., and ROBERT S. LOCKHART. 1972. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11.671-84.
9. DAUGHERTY, KIM, and MARK S. SEIDENBERG. 1992. The past tense revisited. Proceedings of the 14th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum Associates.
10. DEMB, JONATHAN B.; JOHN E. DESMOND; ANTHONY D. WAGNER; CHANDAN J. VAIDYA; GARY H. GLOVER; and JOHN D. E. GABRIELI. 1995. Semantic encoding and retrieval in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: A functional MRI study of task difficulty and process specificity. Journal of Neuroscience 15.5870-78.
11. ELMAN, JEFFREY L.; ELIZABETH A. BATES; MARK J. JOHNSON; ANNETTE KARMILOFF-SMITH; DOMENICO PARISI; and KIM PLUNKETT. 1996. Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. FORSTER, KENNETH I., and CAROL DAVIS. 1984. Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 10.680-98.
13. GABRIELI, JOHN D. E.; JOHN E. DESMOND; JONATHAN B. DEMB; ANTHONY D. WAGNER; MARIA V. STONE; CHANDAN J. VAIDYA; and GARY H. GLOVER. 1996. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of semantic memory processes in the frontal lobes. Psychological Science 7.278-83.
14. GLUCK, MARK A., and DAVID E. RUMELHART (eds.) 1990. Neuroscience and connectionist theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
15. GOLDMAN-RAKIC, PATRICIA S. 1988. Topography of cognition: Parallel distributed networks in primate association cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience 11.137-56.
16. GORDON, BARRY. 1983. Lexical access and lexical decision: Mechanisms of frequency sensitivity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22.24-44.
17. HALLE, MORRIS, and K. P. MOHANAN. 1985. Segmental phonology of modern English. Linguistic Inquiry 16.57-116.
18. HARE, MARY, and JEFFREY L. ELMAN. 1995. Learning and morphological change. Cognition 56.61-98.
19. HARM, MICHAEL W., and MARK S. SEIDENBERG. 1997. Phonology, reading and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, MS.
20. HOEFFNER, JAMES H. 1997. Are rules a thing of the past? A single mechanism account of English past tense acquisition and processing. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University dissertation.
21. JAEGER, JERI J.; ALAN H. LOCKWOOD; DAVID L. KEMMERER; ROBERT D. VAN VALIN; BRIAN W. MURPHY; and HANIF G. KHALAK. 1996. A positron emission tomography study of regular and irregular verb morphology in English. Language 72.451-97.
22. JUST, MARCEL A.; PATRICIA A. CARPENTER; TIMOTHY A. KELLER; WILLIAM F. EDDY; and KEITH R. THULBORN. 1996. Brain activation modulated by sentence comprehension. Science 274.114-16.
23. MACWHINNEY, BRIAN, and JARED LEINBACH. 1991. Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the verb learning model. Cognition 39.121-57.
24. MARSLEN-WILSON, WILLIAM D., and LORRAINE K. TYLER. 1997. Dissociating types of mental computation. Nature 387.592-94.
25. PATTERSON, KARALYN E. 1981. Neuropsychological approaches to the study of reading. British Journal of Psychology 72.151-74.
26. PETERSEN, STEVEN E.; PETER T. FOX; MICHAEL I. POSNER; MARK MINTUN; and MARCUS E. RAICHLE. 1988. Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing. Nature 331.585-89.
27. PINKER, STEVEN. 1991. Rules of language. Science 253.530-35.
28. _, and ALAN PRINCE. 1988. On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition 28.73-193.
29. PLAUT, DAVID C. 1997. Double dissociation without modularity: Evidence from connectionist neuropsychology. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 17.291-321.
30. _; JAMES L. MCCLELLAND; MARK S. SEIDENBERG; and KARALYN E. PATTERSON. 1996. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychology Review 103.56-115.
31. POEPPEL, DAVID. 1996. A critical review of PET studies of phonological processing. Brain and Language 55.317-51.
32. PRASADA, SANDEEP; STEVEN PINKER; and WILLIAM SNYDER. 1990. Some evidence that irregular forms are retrieved from memory but regular forms are rule generated. Paper presented at the 31st annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.
33. RAYNER, KEITH, and ALEXANDER POLLATSEK. 1994. The psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
34. RICE, MABEL (ed.) 1996. Toward a genetics of language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates
35. ROSKIES, ANNE L. 1994. Mapping memory with positron emission tomography. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 91.1989-91.
36. RUMELHART, DAVID E.; JAMES L. MCCLELLAND; and the PDP RESEARCH GROUP (eds.) 1986. Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. SCARBOROUGH, DANIEL L.; CHARLES CORTESE; and HOLLIS S. SCARBOROUGH. 1977. Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3.1-17.
38. SEIDENBERG, MARK S. 1992. Connectionism without tears. Connectionism: Theory and practice, ed. by Stephen Davis, 84-122. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39. _. 1995. Visual word recognition: An overview. Speech, language, and communication, ed. by Joanne L. Miller and Peter D. Eimas, 138-80. San Diego: Academic Press.
40. _, and MAGGIE BRUCK. 1990. Consistency effects in the generation of past tense morphology. Paper presented at the 31st meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.
41. _, and JAMES L. MCCLELLAND. 1989. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review 96.523-68.
42. _; GLORIA S. WATERS; MARCIA BARNES; and MICHAEL K. TANENHAUS. 1984. When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23. 383-404.
43. SERGENT, JUSTINE. 1994. Brain-imaging studies of cognitive functions. Trends in Neurosciences 17.221-27.
44. SHALLICE, TIM. 1988. From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. TARABAN, ROMAN, and JAMES L. MCCLELLAND. 1987. Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. Journal of Memory and Language 26.608-31.
46. ULLMAN, MICHAEL T.; SUZANNE CORKIN; MARIE COPPOLA; GREGORY HICOCK; JOHN H. GROWDON; WALTER J. KOROSHETZ; and STEVEN PINKER. 1997. A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory, and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9.266-76.