A project-based alternative assessment system

Studies in Educational Evaluation

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 171-191

  Tal, Revital T ^a   Dori, Yehudit J ^b   Lazarowitz, Reuven ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034409937     PISSN: 0191491X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0191-491X(00)00014-6     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bakshi, T.S., & Lazarowitz, R. (1982). A model for an interdisciplinary ecology project in secondary schools. Environmental Education and Information, 2 (3), 203-213.
2. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing Ourselves: An Inquiry into the Nature and Implications of Expertise (pp. 183-220). Chicago: Open Court.
3. Black, P. (1995). Assessment and feedback in science education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 21, 257-279.
4. Black, P. (1998). Assessment by teachers and the improvement of student's learning. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin, (Eds.) International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 811-822). New York: Kluwer.
5. Blumenfeld, P.C.. Marx, R.W., Soloway, E., & Krajcik, J. (1996). Learning with peers: From small group cooperation to collaborative communities. Educational Researcher, 25 (8), 37-40.
6. Bybee, R.Y. (1987). Science education and the science-technology-society (S-T-S) theme. Science Education, 71 (5), 667-680.
7. Chen, D., & Stroup, W. (1993). General systems theory: Toward a conceptual framework for science and technology education for all. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2 (3), 447-459.
8. Cheung, D., Hattie, J., Bucat, R., & Douglas, G. (1996). Measuring the degree of implementation of school-based assessment schemes for practical science. Research in Science Education, 26 (4), 375-389.
9. Darling-Hammond, L. (1994). Standards for teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, Chicago, IL, ED378176.
10. Dori, D. (1995). Object-process analysis: Maintaining the balance between system structure and behavior. Journal of Logic and Computation, 5 (2), 227-249.
11. Dori, Y.J. (1994). Achievement and attitude evaluation of a case-based chemistry curriculum for nursing students. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 20 (3), 337-348.
12. Dori, Y.J., & Herscovitz, O. (1999). Question posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: analysis of an environmental case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36 (4), 411-430.
13. Dori, Y.J., & Tal, R.T. (2000). Formal and informal collaborative projects: Engaging in industry with environmental awareness. Science Education, 84 (1), 1-19.
14. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching. New York: American Educational Research Association & Macmillan.
15. Gallagher, J.J. (1991). Uses of interpretive research in science education. In J.J. Gallagher (Ed.), Interpretive Research in Science Education - NARST Monograph, 4, 3-17.
16. Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1981). Effective Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Herried, C.F. (1994a). Case studies in science - A novel method of science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23 (4), 221-229.
18. Hofstein, A., & Rosenfeld, S. (1996). Bridging the gap between formal and informal science learning. Studies in Science Education, 28, 87-112.
19. Keiny, S. (1991). System thinking as a prerequisite for environmental problem solving. In S. Keiny & U. Zoller (Eds.), Conceptual Issues in Environmental Education (pp. 171-184). New York: Peter Lang.
20. Keiny, S. (1995). STES curriculum development as a process of conceptual change. A paper presented at the NARST Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.
21. Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R.W., Bass, K.M., Fredricks, J.F., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classroom: Initial attempts by middle school students. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7 (3/4), 313-350.
22. Lazarowitz, R., & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (1998). Cooperative learning in the science curriculum. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 449-469). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
23. Lewy, A. (1996). Postmodernism in the field of achievement testing. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 22 (3), 223-244.
24. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. London, New Delhi: Sage.
25. McDonald, J., & Czerniac, C. (1994). Developing interdisciplinary units: Strategies and examples. School Science and Mathematics, 94 (1), 5-10.
26. Mitchell, R. (1992). Testing for Learning: How New Approaches to Learning can Improve American Schools (pp. 79-101). New York: The Free Press.
27. Nevo, D. (1983). The conceptualization of educational evaluation: An analytical evaluation of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 53, 117-128.
28. Nevo, D. (1994). Combining internal and external evaluation: A case for school-based evaluation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 20(1), 87-98.
29. Nevo, D. (1995). School-based Evaluation: A Dialogue for School Improvement. Oxford: Elsevier/Pergamon.
30. Posch, P. (1993). Research issues in environmental education. Studies in Science Education, 21, 21-48.
31. Russell, N., & Willinsky, J. (1997). Fourth generation evaluation: The impact of a post-modern paradigm on school-based evaluation. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 2 (3), 187-197.
32. Sarason, S. (1990). The Predictable Failure of Educational Reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33. Sizer, T. (1992). Horace's School: Redesigning the American High School. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
34. Solomon, J. (1993). Teaching Science, Technology and Society. Philadelphia: Open University.
35. Tal, R., Dori, Y.J., & Lazarowitz, R. (1996). Industry-environment projects: An evaluation approach in environmental education. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Teacher Education: Stability, Evolution and Revolution (pp. 599-610).
36. Worthen, B.R. (1993). Critical issues that will determine the future of alternative assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 74 (6), 444-457.
37. Zoller, U. (1991). Problem solving and the "problem solving paradox" in decision-making-oriented environmental education. In S. Keiny & U. Zoller (Eds.), Conceptual Issues in Environmental Education (pp. 71-88). New York: Peter Lang.