Jury verdicts and preference diversity

American Political Science Review

Volumn 94, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 395-406

  Gerardi, Dino ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034336873     PISSN: 00030554     EISSN: 15375943     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2586019     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Austen-Smith, David, and Jeffrey S. Banks. 1996. "Information Aggregation, Rationality, and the Condorcet Jury Theorem." American Political Science Review 90 (March): 34-45.
2. Berg, Sven. 1993. "Condorcet's Jury Theorem, Dependency among Jurors." Social Choice and Welfare 10 (January): 87-95.
3. Condorcet, Marquis de. [1785] 1976. "Essay on the Application of Mathematics to the Theory of Decision-Making." In Condorcet: Selected Writings, ed. Keith M. Baker. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
4. Coughlan, Peter J. 2000. "In Defense of Unanimous Jury Verdicts: Mistrials, Communication, and Strategic Voting." American Political Science Review 94 (June): 375-93.
5. Davis, James H. 1973. "Group Decision and Social Interaction: A Theory of Social Decision Scheme." Psychological Review 80 (March): 97-125.
6. Duggan, John, and César Martinelli. 1999. "A Bayesian Model of Voting in Juries." University of Rochester. Typescript.
7. Feddersen, Timothy J., and Wolfgang Pesendorfer. 1997. "Voting Behavior and Information Aggregation in Elections with Private Information." Econometrica 65 (September): 1029-58.
8. Feddersen, Timothy J., and Wolfgang Pesendorfer. 1998. "Convicting the Innocent: The Inferiority of Unanimous Jury Verdicts." American Political Science Review 92 (March): 23-35.
9. Gelfand, Alan E., and Herbert Solomon. 1977. "An Argument in Favor of 12-Member Juries." In Modeling the Criminal Justice System, ed. Stuart S. Nagel. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10. Grofman, Bernard, and Scott L. Feld. 1988. "Rousseau's General Will: A Condorcetian Perspective." American Political Science Review 82 (June): 567-76.
11. Kalven, Harry, and Hans Zeisel. 1966. The American Jury. Boston: Little, Brown.
12. Klevorick, Alvin K., Michael Rothschild, and Christopher Winship. 1984. "Information Processing and Jury Decision Making. "Journal of Public Economics 23 (April): 245-78.
13. Ladha, Krishna K. 1992. "The Condorcet Jury Theorem, Free Speech, and Correlated Votes." American Journal of Political Science 36 (August): 617-34.
14. Ladha, Krishna K., Gary Miller, and Joe Oppenheimer. 1996. "Information Aggregation by Majority Rule: Theory and Experiments." University of Maryland. Typescript.
15. McKervey, Richard D., and Thomas R. Palfrey. 1998. "An Experimental Study of Jury Decision." California Institute of Technology. Typescript.
16. McLennan, Andrew. 1998. "Consequences of the Condorcet Jury Theorem for Beneficial Information Aggregation by Rational Agents." American Political Science Review 92 (June): 413-8.
17. Myerson, Roger. 1998. "Extended Poisson Games and the Condorcet Jury Theorem." Games and Economic Behavior 25 (October): 111-31.
18. Nagel, Stuart S., and Marian Neef. 1975. "Using Deductive Modeling to Determine an Optimum Jury Size and Fraction Required to Convict." Washington University Law Quarterly 61 (Winter): 933-78.
19. Persico, Nicola. 1999. "Consensus and the Accuracy of Signals: Optimal Committee Design with Endogenous Information." University of Pennsylvania. Typescript.
20. Wit, Yorgen. 1998. "Rational Choice and the Condorcet Jury Theorem." Games and Economic Behavior 22 (February): 364-76.
21. Young, Peyton. 1988. "Condorcet's Theory of Voting." American Political Science Review 82 (December): 1231-44.