Effect of cement type on retention of a tapered post with a self-cutting double thread

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 577-582

  Rosin, M ^a   Splieth, Ch ^a   Wilkens, M ^b   Meyer, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

^b Army Dentist Group of the Bundeswehr   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cement; Compomer; Composite; Glass ionomer; Post retention; Zinc phosphate cement

Indexed keywords

COMPOLUTE; COMPOMER; DYRACT; GLASS IONOMER; KETAC CEM; KETAC-CEM; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENT; RESIN CEMENT; SILICATE; TOOTH CEMENT; ZINC OXIDE; ZINC PHOSPHATE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HARVARD CEMENT; HEAT; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOMERS; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HEAT; HUMANS; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENT; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICATES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH; ZINC OXIDE; ZINC PHOSPHATE CEMENT;

EID: 0034328460     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00045-2     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Newburg RE, Pameijer CH. Retentive properties of post and core systems. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1976;36:636-43.
2. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: Effect of cement, dowel length, diameter and design. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1978;39:401-5.
3. Johnson JK, Sakamura JS. Dowel form and tensile force. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1978;40:645-9.
4. Cohen BI, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Comparison of retentive properties of four post systems. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1992;68:264-8.
5. Cohen BI, Condos S, Musikant BL, et al. Retention properties of a split-shaft threaded post: cut at different apical lengths. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1992;68:894-8.
6. Nergitz I, Schmage P, Platzer U, et al. Effect of different surface textures on retentive strength of tapered posts. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1997;78:451-7.
7. Millstein PL, Yu H, Hsu CS, et al. Effects of cementing on retention of a prefabricated screw post. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1987;57:171-4.
8. Tjan AHL, Tjan AH, Greive JH. Effects of various cementation methods on the retention of prefabricated posts. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1987;58:309-12.
9. Radke RA, Barkhordar RA, Podesta RE. Retention of cast endodontic posts: comparison of cementing agents. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1988;59:318-20.
10. Mendoza DB, Eakle WS. Retention of posts cemented with various dentinal bonding cements. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1994; 72:591-3.
11. Mitchell CA, Orr JF, Connor KN, et al. Comparative study of four glass ionomer luting cements during post pull-out tests. Dental Materials 1994;10:88-91.
12. Utter JD, Wong BH, Miller BH. The effect of cementing procedures on retention of prefabricated metal posts. Journal of the American Dental Association 1997;128:1123-7.
13. Love RM, Purton DG. Retention of posts with resin, glass ionomer and hybrid cements. Journal of Dentistry 1998;26:599-602.
14. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Newmann I, et al. Retention of three endodontic posts cemented with five dental cements. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1998;79:520-5.
15. Duncan JP, Pameeijer CH. Retention of parallel-sided titanium posts cemented with six luting agents: an in vitro study. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1998;80:423-8.
16. Assif D, Etzion J. Serrating the channel walls - its influence on dowel retention. Quintessenz International 1985;2:123-6.
17. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Holcomb J. The dentatus screw: comparative stress analysis with other endodontic dowel designs. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 1982;9:23-33.
18. Juntavee N, Millstein PL. Effect of surface roughness and cement space on crown retention. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1992; 68:482-6.
19. Krejci I, Mueller E, Lutz F. Effects of thermocycling and occlusal force on adhesive composite crowns. Journal of Dental Research 1994;73:1228-32.
20. Laurell L, Lundgren D. A standardized pattern for studying the occlusal force pattern during chewing and biting in prosthetically restored dentitions. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 1984;11:39-44.
21. Liberman R, Ben-Amar A, Urstein M, et al. Conditioning of root canals prior to dowel cementention with luting cement and two dentine adhesive systems. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 1989; 16:597-602.
22. Goldman M, DeVitre R, Pier M. Effect of the dentin smeared layer on tensile strength of cemented posts. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1984;52:485-8.
23. Wilson AD, McLean JW. Glass ionomer cement. Chicago: Quintessence, 1988.
24. Tjan AHL, Nemetz H. Effect of eugenol-containing endodontic sealer on retention of prefabricated posts luted with an adhesive composite resin cement. Quintessenz International 1992;23:839-44.
25. Cohen BI, Condos S, Deutsch AS, et al. Fracture strength of three different core materials in combination with three different endodontic posts. International Journal of Prosthodontics 1994;7:178-82.
26. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Newman I, et al. Cyclic fatigue testing of five endodontic post designs supported by four core materials. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1997;78:458-68.