The effect of cementing procedures on retention of prefabricated metal posts

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 128, Issue 8, 1997, Pages 1123-1127

  Utter, James D ^b   Wong, Brian H ^b   Miller, Barbara H ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLEARFIL BONDING AGENT; DENTAL ALLOY; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; PANAVIA EX; PHOSPHATE; RESIN CEMENT; STAINLESS STEEL; TOOTH CEMENT; ZINC PHOSPHATE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; HUMAN; MOLAR TOOTH; TENSILE STRENGTH; THERMODYNAMICS; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH PULP; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEMENTATION; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; MOLAR; PHOSPHATES; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RESIN CEMENTS; STAINLESS STEEL; TENSILE STRENGTH; THERMODYNAMICS; ZINC PHOSPHATE CEMENT;

EID: 0031201577     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1997.0370     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Standlee J, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: effects of cement, dowel length, diameter and design. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39(4):401-5.
2. Coleman RA, Corcoran JF, Powers JM, Sloan KM, Lorey RE, LaTurno SAL. Dentin-bonded post and cores: an in vitro failure analysis. J Dent Res (Special Issue no. 229) 1987;66:135.
3. Burgess JO, Summitt JB, Robbins JW. The resistance to tensile, compression, and torsional forces provided by four post systems. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:899-903.
4. Cohen BI, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Comparison of retentive properties of four post systems. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68(2):264-8.
5. Gelfand M. A preliminary comparative study of the retentive properties of four post and core systems in etched preparations. J Can Dent Assoc 1992;58(8):665-70.
6. O'Keefe KL, Powers JM, McGuckin RS, Pierpont HP. In vitro bond strength of silica-coated metal posts in roots of teeth. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5(4):373-6.
7. Standlee JP, Caputo AA. Endodontic dowel retention with resinous cements. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68(6):913-7.
8. Tjan AH, Nemetz H. Effect of eugenol-containing endodontic sealer on retention of prefabricated posts luted with an adhesive composite resin cement. Quintessence Int 1992;3:839-44.
9. Burns DR, Douglas HB, Moon PC. Comparison of the retention of endodontic posts after preparation with EDTA. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69(3):262-6.
10. Chan FW, Harcourt JK, Brockhurst PJ. The effect of post adaptation in the root canal on retention of posts cemented with various cements. Aust Dent J 1993;38(1):39-45.
11. Standlee JP, Caputo AA. Effect of surface design on retention of dowels cemented with a resin. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70(5):403-5.
12. Mendoza DB, Eakle WS. Retention of posts cemented with various dentinal bonding cements. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72(6):591-4.
13. Mitchell CA, Orr JT, Connor KN, Magill JP, Maguire GR. Comparative study of four glass ionomer luting cements during post pull-out tests. Dent Mater 1994;10(2):88-91.
14. Paschal JE, Burgess JO. Tensile load to remove posts cemented with different cements. J Dent Res (Special Issue no. 1362) 1995;74:182.
15. Juntavee N, Millstein PL. Effect of surface roughness and cement space on crown retention. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68(3):482-6.
16. Krejci I, Mueller E, Lutz F. Effects of thermocycling and occlusal force on adhesive composite crowns. J Dent Res 1994;73(6): 1228-32.
17. Fortin D, Swift EJ Jr., Denehy GE, Reinhardt JW. Bond strength and microleakage of current dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 1994;10(4):253-8.