Where are the GaPs? A rational approach to monomer acquisition and selection

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 1262-1269

  Leach, Andrew R ^a   Green, Darren V S ^a   Hann, Michael M ^a   Judd, Duncan B ^a   Good, Andrew C ^a,b  

^a GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United Kingdom)

^b BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DRUG;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY; FACTUAL DATABASE; SYNTHESIS;

ALGORITHMS; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES; DATABASES, FACTUAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS;

EID: 0034263171     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci0003855     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Good, A. C.; Kuntz, I. D. Investigating the extension of pairwise distance pharmacophore measures to triplet-based descriptors. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1995, 9 (4), 373-9.
2. Brown, R. D.; Martin, Y. C. Use of Structure-Activity Data to Compare Structure-Based Clustering Methods and Descriptors for Use in Compound Selection. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36 (3), 572-84.
3. Pickett, S. D.; Luttmann, C.; Guerin, V.; Laoui, A.; James, E. DIVSEL and COMPLIB-Strategies for the Design and Comparison of Combinatorial Libraries using Pharmacophoric Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38 (2), 144-150.
4. Matter, H.; Poetter, T.. Comparing 3D Pharmacophore Triplets and 2D Fingerprints for Selecting Diverse Compound Subsets. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39 (6), 1211-1225.
5. Mason, J. S.; Morize, I.; Menard, P. R.; Cheney, D. L.; Hulme, C.; Labaudiniere, R. F. New 4-Point Pharmacophore Method for Molecular Similarity and Diversity Applications: Overview of the Method and Applications, Including a Novel Approach to the Design of Combinatorial Libraries Containing Privileged Substructures. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 6 (17), 3251-3264.
6. Pickett, S. D.; McLay, I. M.; Clark, D. E. Enhancing the Hit-to-Lead Properties of Lead Optimization Libraries. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 263-272.
7. Jakes, S. E.; Willett, P.. Pharmacophoric pattern matching in files of 3-D chemical structures: selection of interatomic distance screens. J. Mol. Graphics 1986, 4 (1), 12-20.
8. Lewis, R. A.; Mason, J. S.; McLay, I. M.. Similarity Measures for Rational Set Selection and Analysis of Combinatorial Libraries: The Diverse Property-Derived (DPD) Approach. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37 (3), 599-614.
9. Cummins, D. J.; Andrews, C. W.; Bentley, J. A.; Cory, M. Molecular Diversity in Chemical Databases: Comparison of Medicinal Chemistry Knowledge Bases and Databases of Commercially Available Compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36 (4), 750-763.
10. Pearlman, R. S.; Smith, K. M. Novel software tools for chemical diversity. Perspect. Drug Discovery Des. 1998, 9/10/11(3D QSAR in Drug Design: Ligand/Protein Interactions and Molecular Similarity), 339-353.
11. McGregor, M. J.; Muskal, S. M. Pharmacophore Fingerprinting. I. Application to QSAR and Focused Library Design. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39 (3), 569-574.
12. McGregor, M. J.; Muskal, S. M. Pharmacophore Fingerprinting. 2, Application to Primary Library Design. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40 (1), 117-125.
13. Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Santa Fe, and http://www. daylight.com/dayhtml/doc/prog/prog.toc.html.
14. Sadowski, J.; Rudolph, C.; Gasteiger, J.. The generation of 3D models of host-guest complexes. Anal. Chim. Acta 1992, 265 (2), 233-41.
15. ChemX was developed at Chemical Design Ltd and is available from Oxford Molecular, Oxford, U.K.
16. Leach, A. R. Structure-based selection of building blocks for array synthesis via the World-Wide Web. J. Mol. Graphics 1997, 15 (3), 158-160.
17. Leach, A. R., Bryce, R. A.; Robinson, A. The synergy between combinatorial chemistry and de novo design. J. Mol. Graphics Model., in press.
18. Good, A. C.; Lewis, R. A. New Methodology for Profiling Combinatorial Libraries and Screening Sets: Cleaning Up the Design Process with HARPick. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40 (24), 3926-3936.
19. Leach, A. R.; Bradshaw, J.; Green, D. V. S.; Hann, M. M.; Delany, J. J., III. Implementation of a System for Reagent Selection and Library Enumeration, Profiling, and Design. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39 (6), 1161-1172.
20. Pozzan, A.; Leach, A.; Feriani, A.; Hann, M.. Virtual optimization of chemical libraries using genetic algorithm. Book of Abstracts, 218th ACS National Meeting, New Orleans, Aug 22-26, 1999.
21. The Available Chemicals Database is from MDL Information Systems Limited, San Leandro, CA.
22. 19
23. Daylight theory manual, chapter 6; Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Santa Fe and http.//www.duylight.com/dayhtml/doc/theory/ theory.finger.html.
24. The Soergel distance is equal to the complement of the well-known Tanimoto coefficient.
25. Leach, A. R.; Atkinson, F. L.; Langley, D. unpublished.