Application of the Omaha system in acute care

Research in Nursing and Health

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 93-105

  Bowles, Kathryn H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

Author keywords

Computerization; Concept match scores; Database; Nomenclature; Nursing classification; Omaha System; Standardized language

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; DOCUMENTATION; GERIATRIC NURSING; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEART DISEASE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MEDICAL RECORD; NOMENCLATURE; NURSE; NURSING; NURSING CARE; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING STAFF; OBSERVER VARIATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEMANTICS; STANDARD;

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; GERIATRIC NURSING; HEART DISEASES; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS, PROBLEM-ORIENTED; NURSE CLINICIANS; NURSING CARE; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING RECORDS; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; OBSERVER VARIATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT CARE PLANNING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEMANTICS; TERMINOLOGY; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 0034168621     PISSN: 01606891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(200004)23:2<93::AID-NUR2>3.0.CO;2-K     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. American Nurses' Association. (1998, August 21). Announcement of ANA recognition of Ozboldt's patient care data set. The SNA Insider, 4, 29.
2. Bowles, K., & Naylor, M. (1996). Nursing intervention classification systems. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 28, 303-308.
3. Brennan, P.F., & Hays, B.J. (1992). The Kappa statistic for establishing interrater reliability in the secondary analysis of qualitative clinical data. Research in Nursing & Health, 15, 153-158.
4. Campbell, J., & Payne, T. (1994). A comparison of four schemes for codification of problem lists. In J. Ozbolt (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care (pp. 201-205). New York: Hanley & Belfus, Inc.
5. Chute, C.G., Atkin, G.E., & Ihrke, D.M. (1992). An empirical evaluation of concept capture by clinical classifications. In K.C. Lunn, P. Degoulet, T.E. Piemme, & O. Rienhoff (Eds.), Geneva, Switzerland Proceedings of MEDINFO, 92 (pp. 1469-1474). Geneva: Elsevier Science Publishers.
6. Cimino, J. (1991). Representation of clinical laboratory terminology in the unified medical language system. In P.D. Clayton (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Symposium on Computers in Medical Care (pp. 199-203). New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
7. Clark, J., & Lang, N. (1992). Nursing's next advance: An international classification of nursing practice. International Nursing Review, 39, 109-112.
8. Coenen, A., Ryan, P., Sutton, J., Devine, E., Werley, H., & Kelber, S. (1995). Use of the nursing minimum data set to describe nursing interventions for select nursing diagnoses and related factors in an acute care setting. Nursing Diagnosis, 6, 108-114.
9. Deatrick, J., Brooten, D., Bowles, K., Ash, L., Borucki, L., Kirby, A., Knapp, H., Miovech, S., Spatz, D., & Velos, J. Evaluation of five nursing classification systems to classify APN functions for six transitional care projects. Manuscript submitted for publication.
10. Doran, K., Sampson, B., Staus, R., Ahern, C., & Schiro, D. (1997). Clinical pathway across tertiary and community care after interventional cardiology procedure. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 11 (2), 1-14.
11. Fawcett, J., & Downs, F. (1992). The relationship of theory and research (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Davis.
12. Gebbie, K.M., & Lavin, M.A. (Eds.). (1975). Classification of nursing diagnosis: Proceedings of the first national conference. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
13. Henry, S., Holzerner, W., Randell, C., Hsieh, S.F., & Miller, T. (1997). Comparison of Nursing Interventions Classification and Current Procedural Terminology Codes for categorizing nursing activities. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 29, 133-138.
14. Henry, S., Holzerner, W., Reilly, C., & Campbell, K. (1994). Terms used by nurses to describe patient problems: Can SNOMED III represent nursing concepts in the patient record? Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1, 61-74.
15. Henry, S.B., & Mead, C. (1997a). Evaluating standardized coding and classification systems for clinical practice: A critical review of the nursing literature in the United States. In U. Gerdin, M. Tallberg, & P.Wainwright (Eds.), Nursing informatics: The impact of nursing knowledge on health care informatics (pp. 15-20). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
16. Henry, S.B., & Mead, C. (1997b). Nursing classification systems: Necessary but not sufficient for representing "what nurses do" for inclusion in computer-based patient record systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 4, 222-232.
17. Henry, S.B., Reilly, C., Miller, T., & Holzerner, W. (1994). Coding of nursing interventions using Iowa Nursing Intervention Classification and Current Procedural Terminology terms: A pilot study. Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Spring Congress (p. 89). Bethesda, MD: American Medical Informatics Association.
18. Henry, S.B., Warren, J.J., Lange, L., & Button, P. (1998). A review of major nursing vocabularies and the extent to which they have the characteristics required for implementation in computer-based systems: Focus on implementation of nursing vocabularies in systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 5, 321-328.
19. Holzemer, W.L., Henry, S.B., Dawson, C., Sousa, K., Bain, C., & Hsieh, S.F. (1997). An evaluation of the utility of the Home Health Care Classification for categorizing patient problems and nursing interventions from the hospital setting. In U. Gerdin, M. Tallberg, & P. Wainwright (Eds.), Nursing informatics: The impact of nursing knowledge on health care informatics (pp. 21-26). Amsterdam: IDS Press.
20. Iowa Intervention Project (IIP). (1993). The NIC taxonomy. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 25, 187-192.
21. Johnson, M., & Maas, M. (1997). Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC): Iowa outcomes project. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
22. Kerr, M.E. (1994). How reliable are your reliability measures? In R.M. Carroll-Johnson & M. Paquette (Eds.), Classification of nursing diagnosis: Proceedings of the tenth conference (pp. 291-293). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
23. Kim, M., McFarland, G., & McLane, A. (Eds.). (1984). Classification of nursing diagnoses: Proceedings of the fifth national conference. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
24. Lang, N.M., Hudgins, C., Jacox, A., Lancour, J., McClure, M., McCormick, K., Saba, V., Stenvig, T., Zielstorff, R., Prescott, P., Milholland, D.K., & O'Connor, K. (1995). An emerging framework for the profession: Data systems advances for clinical nursing practice. Washington, D.C.: American Nurses Association.
25. Martin, K.S. (1999). The Omaha System: Past, present, and future. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics. [On-line], 3(1). Available: http://cac.psu.edu/ ~dxm12/main.html.
26. Martin, K.S., & Gorskj, L.A. (1998). Managed care: Effects on home health care providers and stroke survivors. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 53, 11-24.
27. Martin, K.S. & Norris, J. (1996). The Omaha System: A model for describing practice. Holistic Nursing Practice, 11, 75-83.
28. Martin, K.S., & Scheet, N. (1992). The Omaha System: Applications for community health nursing. Philadelphia: Saunders.
29. McCloskey, J., Bulechek, G., Moorhead, S., & Daly, J. (1996). Nurses' use and delegation of indirect care interventions. Nursing Economic$, 14, 22-33.
30. McCormick, K., Lang, N., Zielstorff, R., Milholland, K., Saba, V., & Jacox, A. (1994). Toward standard classification schemes for nursing language: Recommendations of the American Nurses' Association Steering Committee on Databases to Support Clinical Nursing Practice. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1, 421-427.
31. Moorhead, S.A., McCloskey, J., & Bulechek, G. (1993). Nursing interventions classifications: A comparison with the Omaha and the Home Healthcare Classification. Journal of Nursing Administration, 23(10), 23-29.
32. Morse, J. (1991). Qualitative nursing research: A contemporary dialogue (Rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33. National Library of Medicine (NLM). (1994, May). Unified Medical Language System. National Library of Medicine fact sheet. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
34. Naylor, M., Brooten, D., Jones, R., Lavizzo-Mourey, R., Mezey, M., & Pauly, M. (1994). Comprehensive discharge planning for the hospitalized elderly. A randomized clinical trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 120, 999-1006.
35. Ozbolt, J., Fruchtnight, J.N., & Hayden, J. (1994). Toward clinical standards for clinical nursing information. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1, 175-185.
36. Perioperative nursing data set recognized. (1999, May/ June). American Nurse, p. 9.
37. Saba, V. (1992). The classification of home health care nursing: Diagnoses and interventions. Caring, 11(3), 50-57.
38. Sampson, B.K. & Doran, K. (1998). Health needs of coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients at discharge. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 17, 158-164.
39. Woods, N. (1984). Toward a taxonomy of nursing phenomena. In D. Carnevali, P. Mitchell, N. Woods. & C. Tanner (Eds.), Diagnostic reasoning in nursing (pp. 181-192). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
40. Zielstorff, R.D. (September 30, 1998). Characteristics of a good nursing nomenclature from an informatics perspective. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. [On-line], Available: http://www.nursingworld.org/ ojin/tpc7/tpc7_4.htm
41. Zielstorff, R., Cimino, C., Barnett, G., Hassan, L., & Blewett, D. (1993). Representation of nursing terminology in the UMLS Metathesaurus: A pilot study. In M. Frisse (Ed.), Proceedings of the 16th annual symposium on computer applications in medical care (pp. 392-396). New York: McGraw-Hill.
42. Zielstorff, R.D., Tronni, C., Basque, J., Griffin, L.R., & Welebob, E.M. (1998). Mapping nursing diagnosis nomenclatures for coordinated care. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 30, 369-373.