An evaluation of the utility of the home health care classification for categorizing patient problems and nursing interventions from the hospital setting

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 46, Issue , 1997, Pages 21-26

  Holzemer, W L ^a   Henry, S B ^a   Dawson, C ^a   Sousa, K ^a   Bain, C ^a   Hsieh, S F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DIAGNOSIS; HOSPITALS; NURSING; PATIENT TREATMENT;

DATA SET; HOME CARE; HOSPITAL SETTINGS; LEVEL OF DETAIL; NURSING INTERVENTIONS;

HOME HEALTH CARE;

AIDS RELATED COMPLEX; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; HOME CARE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD; NURSING; NURSING CARE; PNEUMOCYSTOSIS;

AIDS-RELATED OPPORTUNISTIC INFECTIONS; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; INPATIENTS; NURSING CARE; NURSING RECORDS; PNEUMOCYSTIS INFECTIONS;

EID: 0031308919     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-890-8-21     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Clark J, Lang N. Nursing's next advance: an international classification of nursing practice. Int Nurs Rev 1992;39:109-112.
2. Dick RS, Steen EB. The computer-based patient record: an essential technology for health care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1991.
3. Simpson RL, Waite R. NCNIP's system of the future: a call for accountability, revenue control, and national data sets. Nurs Adm Q 1989;14:72-77.
4. Lange L, Jacox A. Using large data bases in nursing and health policy research. J Prof Nurs 1993;9:204-211.
5. Henry SB, Holzemer WL, Reilly CA, Campbell KE. Terms used by nurses to describe patient problems: can SNOMED III represent nursing concepts in the patient record? J Am Med Informatics Assoc 1994;1(1):61-74.
6. McCormick KA, Lang N, Zielstorff R, Milholland DK, Saba V, Jacox A. Toward standard classification schemes for nursing language: recommendations of the American Nurses Association Steering Committee on Databases to Support Clinical Nursing Practice. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 1994;1:421-427.
7. Ozbolt J, Fruchnicht JN, Hayden JR. Toward data standards for clinical nursing information. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 1994;1:175-185.
8. Zielstorff RD, Hudgings CI, Grobe SJ et al. Next-generation nursing information systems: essential characteristics for professional practice. Washington, DC: American Nurses Publishing, 1993.
9. Ingenerf J. Taxonomic vocabularies in medicine: the intention of usage determines different established structures. In: Greenes R, Peterson H, Protti D, eds. Medlnfo95. Vancouver, British Columbia: Health Care Computing & Communications, Canada, Inc., 1995.
10. Martin KS, Scheet NJ. The Omaha System: applications for community health nursing. Philadelphia: W B Saunders, 1992.
11. McCloskey JC, Bulechek GM. Nursing Interventions Classification. St. Louis: C V Mosby, 1992.
12. Iowa Intervention Project. The NIC taxonomy structure. Image 1993;25:187-192.
13. Iowa Intervention Project. Validation and coding of the NIC taxonomy structure. Image 1995;27:43-49.
14. Saba VK. The classification of home health care nursing: diagnoses and interventions. Caring 1992;11(3):50-56.
15. Saba VK. Home Health Care Classification. Caring 1992;11(4):58-60.
16. Côte RA, Rothwell DJ, Palotay JL, Beckett RS. SNOMED International. Northfield, IL: College of Pathologists, 1993.
17. Rector AK, Nowlon WA, Kay S, Horan B, Wilson A. Foundations of an electronic medical record. Methods Inf Med 1991;30:179-186.
18. Henry SB, Holzemer WL, Randell C, Hsieh S-F, Miller TJ. Comparison of Nursing Interventions Classification and Current Procedural Terminology codes for categorizing nursing activities. Image in press.