Evaluating standardized coding and classification systems for clinical practice: A critical review of the nursing literature in the United States

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 46, Issue , 1997, Pages 15-20

  Henry, S B ^a   Mead, C N ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CarecCentric Solutions Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; MEDICAL COMPUTING; NURSING; PATIENT TREATMENT;

CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM; CLINICAL PRACTICES; COMPUTER-BASED SYSTEM; CRITERIA FOR EVALUATIONS; CRITICAL REVIEW; EVALUATION STUDY; HEALTH CARE INFORMATION SYSTEM; NURSING INTERVENTIONS;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

CLASSIFICATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

CLASSIFICATION; DATA COLLECTION; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; UNITED STATES; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 0031305210     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-890-8-15     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Iowa Intervention Project. The NIC taxonomy structure. Image 1993;25:187-192.
2. McCloskey JC, Bulechek GM. Nursing Interventions Classification. (2nd ed.) St. Louis: C. V. Mosby, 1996.
3. Clark J, Lang NM. Nursing's next advance: An international classification for nursing practice. Int Nurs Rev 1992;39:109-112.
4. Humphreys B, Lindberg DAB. Building the unified medical language system. In: Kingsland L, ed. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1989:475-480.
5. Henry SB, Holzemer WL, Reilly CA, Campbell KE. Terms used by nurses to describe patient problems: Can SNOMED III represent nursing concepts in the patient record? J Am Med Informatics Assoc 1994;1:61-74.
6. Chute CG, Atken GE, Ihrke DM. An empirical evaluation of concept capture by clinical classifications. In: Lun KC, Degoulet P, Piemme TE, Riehoff O, eds. Medlnfo92. Geneva, Switzerland: North-Holland, 1992
7. Chute CG, Cohn SP, E. CK, Oliver DE, Campbell JR. The content coverage of clinical classifications. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 1996;3(3):224-233.
8. Campbell KE, Musen M. Representation of clinical data using SNOMED III and conceptual graphs. In: Frisse ME, ed. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Baltimore, MD: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1992.
9. Campbell JR, Kallhenberg GA, Sherrick RC. The clinical utility of META: An analysis for hypertension. In: Frisse M, ed. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Symposium of Computer Applications in Medical Care. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993
10. Cimino JJ, Hripsak G, Johnson SB, Clayton PD. Designing an introspective, multi-purpose, controlled medical vocabulary. In: Kingsland III LC, ed. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Washington, D.C.: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1989.
11. McCormick K, Lang N, Zielstorff R, Milholland DK, Saba V, Jacox A. Toward standard classification schemes for nursing language: Recommendations of the American Nurses Association Steering Committee on Databases to Support Nursing Practice. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 1994;1:421-427.
12. Ingenerf J. Taxonomic vocabularies in medicine: the intention of usage determines different established structures. In: Greenes RA, Peterson HE, Protti DJ, eds. Medlnfo95. Vancouver, British Columbia: Health Care Computing & Communications, Canada, Inc., 1995.
13. Rector AL, Nowlon WA, Kay S, Horan B, Wilson A. Foundations of an electronic medical record. Methods Information Med 1991;30:179-186.
14. Ozbolt JG. From minimum data to maximum impact: using clinical data to strengthen patient care. Adv Prac Nurs Q 1996;1(4):62-69.
15. Griffith HM, Robinson KR. Survey of the degree to which critical care nurses are performing Current Procedural Terminology-coded services. Am J Crit Care 1992;1:91-98.
16. Griffith HM, Robinson KR. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coded services provided by nurse specialists. Image 1993;25:178-186.
17. Henry SB, Holzemer WL, Randell C, Hsieh S-F, Miller TJ. Comparison of Nursing Interventions Classification and Current Procedural Terminology codes for categorizing nursing activities. Image, In press.
18. Holzemer WL, Henry SB, Dawson C, Sousa K, Bain C, Hsieh S-F. An evaluation of the utility of the Home Health Care Classification for categorizing patient problems and nursing interventions from the hospital setting. NI97. Stockholm, Sweden, 1997.
19. Ozbolt J, Graves J. Clinical nursing informatics. Developing tools for knowledge workers. Nurs Clin N Am 1993;28(2):407-425.
20. Ozbolt J, Fruchtnicht JN, Hayden JR. Toward data standards for clinical nursing information. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 1994;1:175-185.
21. Parlocha PK. Examination of a Critical Path for Psychiatric Home Care Patients with a Diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder [PhD]. San Francisco, CA: University of California, San Francisco, 1995.
22. Zielstorff RD, Cimino C, Barnett GO, Hassan L, Blewett DR. Representation of nursing terminology in the UMLS Metathesaurus: a pilot study. In: Frisse M, ed. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993:392-396.
23. Henry SB, Mead CN. Standardized nursing classification systems: necessary, but not sufficient for representing what nurses do. In: Cimino J, ed. Fall Symposium of the American Medical Informatics Association. Washington, DC: Hanley & Belfus, 1996.
24. Evans D, Chute C, Cimino JJ, et al. CANON: Toward a medical concept representation language. Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Spring Congress. Bethesda, MD: American Medical Informatics Association, 1993.
25. Grobe SJ. Nursing intervention lexicon and taxonomy: Methodological aspects. In: Hovenga EJS, Hannah KJ, McCormick KA, Ronald JS, eds. Nursing Informatics 91: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Nursing Use of Computers and Information Science. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1991
26. Grobe SJ. Personal communication, June 1996.
27. Humphreys B. Vocabularies for computer-based patient records: identifying candidates for large scale testing. Invitational Meeting at the National Library of Medicine. December, 1994.
28. Moorman PW, van Ginneken AM, van der Lei J, van Bemmel JH. A model for structured data entry based on explicit descriptional knowledge. Methods Information Med 1994;33:454-463.
29. Hardiker NR, Kirby J. Overcoming terminological barriers in nursing. In Brendies J et al, eds. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of the European Federation for Medical Informatics, Copenhagen, 1996:227-231.