Nursing intervention classification systems

Journal of Nursing Scholarship

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 303-308

  Bowles, Kathy H ^b   Naylor, Mary D ^a,b  

^a Dept of Undergraduate Education ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Nursing classification; Nursing interventions; Nursing minimum data set

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; NURSING PROCESS; NURSING RESEARCH; REPRODUCIBILITY;

COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING; HUMANS; NURSING PROCESS; NURSING RECORDS; NURSING RESEARCH; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 0030329698     PISSN: 15276546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1996.tb00378.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Abdellah, F. (1988). Future directions: Refining, implementing, testing, and evaluating the nursing minimum data set. In H. Werley & N. Lang (Eds.), Identification of the Nursing Minimum Data Set, 416-426. New York: Springer.
2. American Nurses Association (1993, March). Nursing classification recognized by the National Library of Medicine. American Nurse, 25(3), 9.
3. Anderson, B. & Hannah, K. (1993). A Canadian Nursing Minimum Data Set: A major priority. Canadian Journal of Nursing Administration, May/June, 7-13.
4. Bulechek, G.M., & McCloskey, J.C. (1992). Defining and validating nursing interventions. Nursing Clinics of North America, 27(2), 289-299.
5. Cell, P., Peters, D., & Gordon, J. (1984). Implementing a nursing diagnosis system through research: The New Jersey experience. Home Healthcare Nurse, 2(1), 26-32.
6. Clark, J., & Lang, N. (1992). Nursing's next advance: An international classification of nursing practice. International Nursing Review, 39(4), 109-112.
7. Daly, J.M. (1993). NIC interventions linked to NANDA diagnoses. Iowa Intervention Project. St. Louis: Mosby.
8. Delaney, C., Mehmert, P., Prophet, C., Bellinger, S., Huber, D., & Ellerbe, S. (1992). Standardized nursing language for healthcare information systems. Journal of Medical Systems, 16(4), 145-159.
9. Devine, E. (1988). The Nursing Minimum Data Set: Benefits and implications for nurse researchers. In National League for Nursing, Perspectives in Nursing, 115-118. New York: National League for Nursing.
10. Fitzpatrick, J., Kerr, M., Saba, V., Hoskins, L., Hurley, M., Mills, W., Rottkamp, B., Warren, J., & Carpenito, L. (1989). Translating nursing diagnosis into ICD code. American Journal of Nursing, 89(4), 493-495.
11. Gebbie, K.M., & Lavin, M.A. (Eds.). (1975). Classification of nursing diagnosis: Proceedings of the first national conference. St. Louis: Mosby.
12. Hays, B. (1992). Nursing care requirements and resource consumption in home health care. Nursing Research, 41(3), 138-143.
13. Health Care Financing Administration (1977). Medicare: Home health agency manual. Washington, D.C.: Author.
14. Helberg, J. (1988). Reliability of a problem classification index for well mothers and children in community health nursing. Public Health Nursing, 5, 24-29.
15. Helberg, J. (1993). Patients' status at home care discharge. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 25(2), 93-99.
16. Henry, S., Holzemer, W., Reilly, C., & Campbell, K. (1994). Terms used by nurses to describe patient problems: Can SNOMED III represent nursing concepts in the patient record? Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1(1), 61-74.
17. Iowa Intervention Project. (1993a). The NIC taxonomy structure. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 25(3), 187-192.
18. Iowa Intervention Project. (1993b). Software developed. The NIC Letter, 1(1), 2.
19. Iowa Intervention Project. (1994a). Field site implementation. The NIC Letter, 2(1), 1.
20. Iowa Intervention Project. (1994b). Genesis medical center implements NIC on information system. The NIC Letter, 2(3), 2.
21. Iowa Intervention Project. (1995). Coding of the NIC taxonomy. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 27(1), 43-49.
22. Kraegel, J. (1988). Potential impact of the Nursing Minimum Data Set on the development of health policy: Public and private. In H. Werley & N. Lang (Eds.), Identification of the Nursing Minimum Data Set, 370-379. New York: Springer.
23. Lang, N., Galliher, J., & Hirsch, I. (1989). Challenge to the profession. In American Nurses' Association, Classification systems for describing nursing practice: Working papers, 70-73. Kansas City, MO: American Nurses' Association.
24. Leske, J., & Werley, H. (1992). Use of the Nursing Minimum Data Set. Computers in Nursing, 10(6), 259-263.
25. Marek, K. (1992). Analysis of the relationships among nursing diagnoses and other selected patient factors, nursing interventions and other measures of utilization, and outcomes in home health care. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 1992). Dissertation Abstracts International, 53/04, 1787.
26. Martin, K. (1989). Omaha System. In American Nurses' Association, classification systems for describing nursing practice: Working papers, 43-47. Kansas City, MO: American Nurses' Association.
27. Martin, K., Leak, G., & Aden, C. (1992). The Omaha System: A research based model for decision making. Journal of Nursing Administration, 22(11), 47-52.
28. Martin, K., & Scheet, N. (1988). Research in home care. Nursing Clinics of North America, 23(2), 373-385.
29. Martin, K., & Scheet, N. (1992). The Omaha System: Applications for community health nursing. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.
30. Martin, K., Scheet, N., & Stegman, M.R. (1993). Home health clients: Characteristics, outcomes of care, and nursing interventions. American Journal of Public Health, 83, 1730-1734.
31. McCloskey, J. (1988). The Nursing Minimum Data Set: Benefits and implications for nurse educators. In National League for Nursing (Ed.), Perspectives in nursing 1987-1989, 119-126. New York: National League for Nursing.
32. McCloskey, J., & Bulechek, G. (Eds.). (1992). Nursing interventions classification (NIC). St. Louis: Mosby.
33. McCormick, K., Lang, N., Zielstorff, R., Milholland, K., Saba, V., & Jacox, A. (1994). Toward standard classification schemes for nursing language: Recommendations of the American Nurses Association steering committee on databases to support clinical nursing practice. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1(6), 421-427.
34. Moorhead, S.A., McCloskey, J., & Bulechek, G. (1993). Nursing interventions classifications: A comparison with the Omaha and the Home Healthcare Classification. Journal of Nursing Administration, 23(10), 23-29.
35. Pasquale, D. (1987). A basis for prospective payment for home care. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 19, 186-191.
36. Peters, D. (1988). Development of a community health intensity rating scale. Nursing Research, 37, 202-207.
37. Saba, V. (1992 a). The classification of home health care nursing: Diagnoses and interventions. Caring, 11(3), 50-57.
38. Saba, V. (1992 b). Home health care classification. Caring, 11(5), 58-60.
39. Saba, V., O'Hare, A., Zuckerman, A., Boondas, J., Levine, E., & Oatway, D. (1991). A nursing intervention taxonomy for home health care. Nursing and Health Care, 12(6), 296-299.
40. Saba, V., & Zuckerman, A. (1992). A new home health classification method. Caring, 11(10), 27-34.
41. Serra, R.M. (1992). Experiences with the Omaha System in Des Moines. In K. Martin & N. Scheet (Eds.), The Omaha System: Applications for community health, 170-195. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.
42. Simmons, D.A. (1980). A classification scheme for client problems in community health nursing. DHHS Publication No. HRA 80-16, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
43. Wake, M., Murphy, M., Affara, F., Lang, N., Clark, J., & Mortensen, R. (1993). Toward an international classification for nursing practice: A literature review and survey. International Nursing Review, 40(3), 77-80.
44. Weidmann, J., & North, H. (1987). Implementing the Omaha Classification System in a public health agency. Nursing Clinics of North America, 22, 971-979.
45. Werley, H. (1988). Introduction to the Nursing Minimum Data Set and its development. In H. Werley & N. Lang (Eds.), Identification of the Nursing Minimum Data Set, 1-15. New York: Springer.
46. Werley, H., Devine, E., Zorn, C., Ryan, P., & Westra, B. (1991). The Nursing Minimum Data Set: Abstraction tool for standardized, comparable, essential data. American Journal of Public Health, 81, 421-426.
47. Werley, H. & Grier, M. (1981). Nursing Information Systems. New York: Springer.
48. Werley, H., & Lang, N. (Eds.). (1988). Identification of the Nursing Minimum Data Set. New York: Springer.
49. Werley, H., Lang, N., & Westlake, S. (1986). The Nursing Minimum Data Set conference: Executive summary. Journal of Professional Nursing, 2, 217-224.
50. Werley, H., & Zorn, C. (1989). The Nursing Minimum Data Set and its relationship to classifications for nursing practice. In American Nurses' Association, Classification systems for describing nursing practice: Working papers, 50-54. Kansas City, MO: American Nurses' Association.
51. Zielstorff, R., Cimino, C., Barnett, G., Hassan, L., & Blewett, D. (1993). Representation of nursing terminology in the UMLS Metathesaurus: A pilot study. In P.D. Clayton (Ed.), Proceedings of the fifteenth annual symposium on computer applications in medical care, 392-396. New York: McGraw-Hill.