Response of plant development to environment: Control of flowering by daylength and temperature

Current Opinion in Plant Biology

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 37-42

  Reeves, Paul H ^a   Coupland, George ^a  

^a JOHN INNES CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DAY LENGTH; ENVIRONMENT; FLOWERING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MODEL; TEMPERATURE;

ARABIDOPSIS;

EID: 0034142092     PISSN: 13695266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1369-5266(99)00041-2     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Koornneef M., Alonso-Blanco C., Peeters A.J.M., Soppe W. Genetic control of flowering time in Arabidopsis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 49:1998;345-370.
2. Levy Y.Y., Dean C. The transition to flowering. Plant Cell. 10:1998;1973-1989.
3. Piñeiro M., Coupland G. The control of flowering time and floral identity in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 117:1998;1-8.
4. Lee I., Bleecker A., Amasino R. Analysis of naturally occurring late flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genet. 237:1993;171-176.
5. Clarke J.H., Dean C. Mapping FRI, a locus controlling flowering time and vernalization response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genet. 242:1994;81-89.
6. Burn J.E., Smyth D.R., Peacock W.J., Dennis E.S. Genes conferring late flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetica. 90:1993;147-155.
7. Martínez-Zapater J.M., Somerville C.R. Effect of light quality and vernalization on late-flowering mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 92:1990;770-776.
8. Koornneef M., Hanhart C.J., van der Veen J.H. A genetic and physiological analysis of late-flowering mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genet. 229:1991;57-66.
9. Lee I., Michaels S.D., Masshardt A.S., Amasino R.M. The late-flowering phenotype of FRIGIDA and mutations in LUMINIDEPENDENS is suppressed in the Landsberg erecta strain of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 6:1994;903-909.
10. Koornneef M., Blankestijn-de Vries H., Hanhart C., Soppe W., Peeters T. The phenotype of some late-flowering mutants is enhanced by a locus on chromosome 5 that is not effective in the Landsberg erecta wild-type. Plant J. 6:1994;911-919.
11. ••] they provide strong evidence that FLC plays a central role in coordinating the promotion of flowering by both the autonomous and vernalization pathways. The flf-1 mutation, an allele of FLC that dominantly delays flowering, also causes a reduced response to gibberellic acid, suggesting that FLC may repress the promotion of flowering by this plant growth regulator.
12. Michaels S.D., Amasino R.M. FLOWERING LOCUS C encodes a novel MADS-domain protein that acts as a repressor of flowering. Plant Cell. 11:1999;949-956. This paper reports the isolation of the FLC gene using a map-based cloning strategy. The isolation of FLC null alleles by mutagenesis of plants carrying late FRI alleles or ld mutations confirms the role of FLC as a floral repressor, as does the phenotype of plants overexpressing the FLC gene.
13. Chandler J., Wilson A., Dean C. Arabidopsis mutants showing an altered response to vernalization. Plant J. 10:1996;637-644.
14. Koornneef M., Alonso-Blanco C., Blankestijn-de Vries H., Hanhart C.J., Peeters A.J.M. Genetic interactions among late flowering mutants of Arabidopsis. Genetics. 148:1998;885-892. This paper describes genetic interactions between many of the late-flowering mutants. The exhaustive analysis of double mutants enables a detailed model of how these flowering time genes act to promote flowering to be proposed.
15. Alonso-Blanco C., El-Assal S.E., Coupland G., Koornneef M. Analysis of natural allelic variation at flowering time loci in the Landsberg erecta and Cape Verde Islands ecotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics. 149:1998;749-764. Allelic variation in flowering behavior between the Landsberg erecta and CVI ecotypes, which have similar responses to photoperiod and vernalization, can be mainly attributed to four quantitive trait loci (QTLs). The EDI locus appears to be involved in the photoperiodic response, whereas other loci have a similar behavior to genes in the autonomous and vernalization-dependent floral promotion pathways. Interestingly, the analysis of these other loci suggests that the activity of the autonomous pathway is also likely to be influenced by daylength, with short days inhibiting its activity.
16. Zagotta M.T., Hicks K.A., Jacobs C.I., Young J.C., Hangarter R.P., Meeks-Wagner D.R. The Arabidopsis ELF3 gene regulates vegetative photomorphogenesis and the photoperiodic induction of flowering. Plant J. 10:1996;691-702.
17. Hicks K.A., Millar A.J., Carré I.A., Somers D.E., Straume M., Meeks-Wagner D.R., Kay S.A. Conditional circadian dysfunction of the Arabidopsis early flowering 3 mutant. Science. 274:1996;790-792.
18. Schaffer R., Ramsay N., Samach A., Corden S., Putterill J., Carré I.A., Coupland G. The late elongated hypocotyl mutation of Arabidopsis disrupts circadian rhythms and the photoperiodic control of flowering. Cell. 93:1998;1219-1229. The isolation of the LHY gene is described. The lhy mutation, which is due to a transposon insertion that results in overexpression of the LHY gene, causes photoperiod-insensitive flowering phenotype and disrupts circadian rhythms. Data are also presented showing that LHY participates in a negative-feedback loop that regulates its own expression.
19. ••], the results suggest that CCA1 and LHY are closely associated with the circadian oscillator.
20. Wang Z., Kenigsbuch D., Sun L., Harel E., Ong M.S., Tobin E.M. A Myb-related transcription factor is involved in the phytochrome regulation of an Arabidopsis Lhcb gene. Plant Cell. 9:1997;491-507.
21. Green R.M., Tobin E.M. Loss of circadian clock-associated protein 1 in Arabidopsis results in altered clock-regulated gene expression. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 96:1999;4176-4179. The isolation of a cca1 null allele is reported. The mutation shortens the period of circadian-clock regulated gene expression, indicating that LHY cannot fully compensate for the loss of CCA1. The cca1 mutation also affects the phytochrome induction of the Lhcb1*3 gene, suggesting that CCA1 may act at a point of integration between phytochrome and the clock.
22. Millar A.J., Carré I.A., Strayer C.A., Chua N., Kay S.A. Circadian clock mutants in Arabidopsis identified by luciferase imaging. Science. 267:1995;1161-1163.
23. Somers D.E., Webb A.A.R., Pearson M., Kay S.A. The short-period mutant, toc1-1, alters circadian clock regulation of multiple outputs throughout development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development. 125:1998;485-494. This paper shows the alteration of numerous clock-controlled responses by the toc1 mutation, suggesting that TOC1 plays a central role in the circadian clock. The early flowering of toc1 mutants in a Landsberg erecta genetic background and the severely reduced daylength sensitivity of these mutants provides further evidence for the link between the circadian clock and the photoperiodic regulation of flowering in Arabidopsis.
24. Rédei G.P. Supervital mutants of Arabidopsis. Genetics. 47:1962;443-460.
25. Araki T., Komeda Y. Analysis of the role of the late flowering locus, GI, in the flowering of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 3:1993;231-239.
26. Eimert K., Wang S., Lue W., Chen J. Monogenic recessive mutations causing both late floral initiation and excess starch accumulation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 7:1995;1703-1712.
27. Fowler S., Lee K., Onouchi H., Samach A., Richardson K., Morris B., Coupland G., Putterill J. GIGANTEA: a circadian clock-controlled gene that regulates photoperiodic flowering in Arabidopsis and encodes a protein with several possible membrane-spanning domains. EMBO J. 18:1999;4679-4688. The cloning of the GIGANTEA gene by T-DNA tagging is reported, and its expression is shown to be controlled by the circadian clock. The role of the ELF3, LHY, and CCA1 genes in the regulation of GI expression is also examined.
28. Park D.H., Somers D.E., Kim Y.S., Choy Y.H., Lim H.K., Soh M.S., Kim H.J., Kay S.A., Nam H.G. Control of circadian rhythms and photoperiodic control of flowering by the Arabidopsis GIGANTEA gene. Science. 285:1999;1579-1581. This paper describes the isolation of the GIGANTEA gene using a map-based cloning strategy. Mutations in this gene are shown to affect the period of the circadian clock, although the two gi alleles analysed have different effects. The effect of light fluence rate on the clock period in the gi-1 mutant, and the reduced effect gi mutations have on period length in continuous darkness, suggests that GI may be involved in controlling light signaling to the clock.
29. Weller J.L., Murfet I.C., Reid J.B. Pea mutants with reduced sensitivity to far-red light define an important role for phytochrome A in day-length detection. Plant Physiol. 114:1997;1225-1236.
30. Brown J.A.M., Klein W.H. Photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heyhn. Plant Physiol. 47:1971;393-399.
31. Guo H., Yang W., Mockler T.C., Lin C. Regulation of flowering time by Arabidopsis photoreceptors. Science. 279:1998;1360-1363. The late flowering of the fha mutant, which affects the photoperiodic floral promotion pathway, is shown to be due to a mutation in the blue light receptor CRYPTOCHROME 2.
32. Somers D.E., Devlin P.F., Kay S.A. Phytochromes and cryptochromes in the entrainment of the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Science. 282:1998;1488-1490. The authors explore the effect of light fluence rate on the circadian period in mutants that are deficient in specific phytochromes and cryptochromes. The results show that several photoreceptors are involved in the regulation of the circadian clock.
33. Mockler T.C., Guo H., Yang H., Duong H., Lin C. Antagonistic actions of Arabidopsis cryptochromes and phytochrome B in the regulation of flowering. Development. 126:1999;2073-2082. Genetic analysis allows the authors to propose a detailed model for the interaction of cryptochromes and phytochrome B in the regulation of flowering time. Light quality is shown to be most important during a developmental stage between 1 and 7 days after germination. Interestingly, this also corresponds to the time required for long-day grown Arabidopsis plants to become committed to flower.
34. Parcy F., Nilsson O., Busch M.A., Lee I., Weigel D. A genetic framework for floral patterning. Nature. 395:1998;561-566. The authors explore the role of the floral meristem identity gene LEAFY in the activation of floral homeotic genes, showing that it is involved in the regulation of APETALA1, APETALA3, and AGAMOUS. In addition, the LFY protein is shown to be nuclear localized and can bind to sequences present in the AP1 promoter.
35. Busch M.A., Bomblies K., Weigel D. Activation of a floral homeotic gene in Arabidopsis. Science. 285:1999;585-587. This paper describes a LEAFY (LFY) responsive enhancer contained within the second intron of the AGAMOUS (AG) gene, and shows that LFY is an activator of AG.
36. Wagner D., Sablowski R.W.M., Meyerowitz E.M. Transcriptional activation of APETALA1 by LEAFY. Science. 285:1999;582-584. The authors demonstrate that AP1 is an immediate target of transcriptional activation by LFY using steroid-inducible LFY activity.
37. Nilsson O., Lee I., Blázquez M.A., Weigel D. Flowering-time genes modulate the response to LEAFY activity. Genetics. 150:1998;403-410. A detailed analysis of the effect of late-flowering mutations on the expression of the LFY gene, and the phenotype of transgenic 35S::LFY plants. The separation of genes into groups that affect LFY transcription and those that affect the response to LFY, does not correspond to the classical groupings that were made on the basis of physiological responses. A model for how the different floral promotion pathways interact is also proposed.
38. Simon R., Igeño M.I., Coupland G. Activation of floral meristem identity genes in Arabidopsis. Nature. 384:1996;59-62.
39. Ruiz-García L., Madueño F., Wilkinson M., Haughn G., Salinas J., Martínez-Zapater J.M. Different roles of flowering-time genes in the activation of floral initiation genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 9:1997;1921-1934.
40. Aukerman M.J., Lee I., Weigel D., Amasino R.M. The Arabidopsis flowering-time gene LUMINIDEPENDENS is expressed primarily in regions of cell proliferation and encodes a nuclear protein that regulates LEAFY expression. Plant J. 18:1999;195-203. This report describes the expression pattern of the LD gene and the nuclear localization of the LD protein. In addition, the interaction of LD with floral meristem identity genes is also examined and indicates that, although LD is involved in the activation of LFY, it is also likely to be required for the activation of other meristem identity genes.
41. Page T., Macknight R., Yang C., Dean C. Genetic interactions of FCA, an Arabidopsis gene controlling flowering time, with genes regulating floral initiation. Plant J. 17:1999;231-239. Analysis of the affect of the fca mutation on several meristem identity mutants and 35S::LFY plants indicates that FCA is likely to promote flowering in multiple pathways.
42. Melzer S., Kampmann G., Chandler J., Apel K. FPF1 modulates the competence to flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 18:1999;395-405. The FPF1 gene is believed to play a role in the gibberellin-dependent promotion of flowering, with plants overexpressing the FPF1 gene flowering earlier than wild-type. Genetic analysis with 35S::FPF1, 35S::LFY and lfy plants suggests that FPF1 acts to promote flowering in a parallel pathway to LFY.
43. Mandel M.A., Yanofsky M.F. A gene triggering flower formation in Arabidopsis. Nature. 377:1995;522-524.
44. Hempel F.D., Weigel D., Mandel M.A., Ditta G., Zambryski P.C., Feldman L.J., Yanofsky M.F. Floral determination and expression of floral regulatory genes in Arabidopsis. Development. 124:1997;3845-3853.