A survey of morphological characters for phylogenetic study of the transition to pleurocarpy

Bryologist

Volumn 102, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 651-682

  Newton, Angela E ^a,b   De Luna, Efrain ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE ECOLOGÍA   (Mexico)

^b DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRYALES; BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES; PTERIDOPHYTA; PYRRHOBRYUM; RHIZOGONIACEAE;

EID: 0033428204     PISSN: 00072745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3244254     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. AKIYAMA, H. 1990a. Morphology and taxonomic significance of dormant branch primordia, dormant buds, and vegetative reproductive organs in the suborders Leucodontiniae and Neckerineae (Musci, Isobryales). THE BRYOLOGIST 93: 395-408.
2. _. 1990b. A morphological study of branch development in mosses with special reference to pseudoparaphyllia. Botanical Magazine of Tokyo 103: 269-282.
3. _ & N. NISHIMURA. 1993a. The Climacium type branch development in the Bartramiaceae and its taxonomic significance. THE BRYOLOGIST 96: 185-191.
4. _ & _. 1993b. Further studies on branch buds in mosses; pseudoparaphyllia and scaly leaves. Journal of Plant Research 106: 101-108.
5. ALLEN, B. 1987. On distinguishing Pterobryaceae and Meteoriaceae by means of pseudoparaphyllia. Bryological Times 42: 1-3.
6. BREMER, K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10: 295-304.
7. BROTHERUS, V. F. 1924-1925. Musci (Laubmoose) 2. Hälfte, pp. 1-542. In A. Engler & K. Prantl (eds.), Die Naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien. W. Engelmann, Leipzig.
8. BUCK, W. R. 1987. Taxonomic and nomenclatural rearrangements in the Hookeriales with notes on West Indian taxa. Brittonia 39: 210-224.
9. _. 1991. The basis for familial classification in pleurocarpous mosses. Advances in Bryology 4: 169-185.
10. _ & D. H. VITT. 1986. Suggestions for a new familial classification of pleurocarpous mosses. Taxon 35: 21-60.
11. CHEVERUD, J. M., G. P. WAGNER & M. M. DOW. 1989. Methods for the comparative analysis of variation patterns. Systematic Zoology 38: 201-213.
12. CHURCHILL, S. P. & W. R. BUCK. 1982. A taxonomic investigation of Leptotheca (Rhizogoniaceae). Brittonia 34: 1-11.
13. COX, C. J. & T. A. HEDDERSON. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships among the ciliate arthrodontous mosses: evidence from chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 215: 119-139.
14. CRANDALL, B. J. 1969. Morphology and development of branches in the leafy Hepaticae. Beihefte Nova Hedwigia 30: 1-261.
15. CRANDALL-STOTLER, B. J. 1972. Morphogenetic patterns of branch formation in the leafy Hepaticae: a resume. THE BRYOLOGIST 75: 381-403.
16. CROSBY, M. R. 1980. The diversity and relationships of mosses, pp. 115-129. In R. J. Taylor & A. E. Leviton (eds.), The Mosses of North America. Pacific Division, AAAS, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco.
17. CRUM, H. & L. E. ANDERSON. 1981. Mosses of Eastern North America. Columbia University Press, NY.
18. CRUNDWELL, A. C. 1979. Rhizoids and moss taxonomy, pp. 347-363. In G. C. S. Clarke & J. G. Duckett (eds.), Bryophyte Systematics. The Systematics Association Special Volume No. 14. Academic Press, London.
19. DAMANHURI, A. & R. E. LONGTON. 1996. Towards a revision of the moss genus Taxithelium (Sematophyllaceae). Anales del Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Serie Botánico 67: 35-58.
20. DAVIS, P. H. & V. H. HEYWOOD. 1973. Principles of Angiosperm Taxonomy. Robert E. Kreiger, NY.
21. DE LUNA, E. 1990. Developmental evidence of acrocarpy in Hedwigia ciliata (Musci: Hedwigiaceae). Tropical Bryology 2: 53-60.
22. _. 1995. The circumscription and phylogenetic relationships of the Hedwigiaceae (Musci). Systematic Botany 20: 347-373.
23. _, A. E. NEWTON, A. WITHEY, D. GONZALEZ & B. D. MISHLER. 1999. The transitions to moss pleurocarpy: a phylogenetic analysis based on rbcL sequences and morphology. THE BRYOLOGIST 102: xxx-xxx.
24. DE PINNA, M. C. C. 1991. Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm. Cladistics 7: 367-394.
25. DONOGHUE, M. J. 1989. Phylogenies and the analysis of evolutionary sequences, with examples from seed plants. Evolution 43: 1137-1156.
26. EDWARDS, S. R. 1979. Taxonomic implications of cell patterns in haplolepidous moss peristomes, pp. 317-363. In G. C. S. Clarke & J. G. Duckett (eds.), Bryophyte Systematics. The Systematics Association Special Volume No. 14. Academic Press.
27. _. 1984. Homologies and inter-relationships of moss peristomes, pp. 658-695. In R. M. Schuster (ed.), New Manual of Bryology. The Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan.
28. FLEISCHER, M. 1904-1905. Musci der Flora von Buitenzorg. E. J. Brill, Leiden.
29. FLOWERS, S. 1973. Mosses: Utah and the West. Brigham Young University Press, Provo.
30. FREY. W. 1977. Neue Vorstellungen über die Vervandschaftsgruppen und die Stammesgeschichte der Laubmoose, pp. 117-139. In W. Frey, H. Huaka & F. Oberwinkler (eds.), Beiträge zur Biologie der niederen Pflanzen, Stuttgart.
31. FUNK, V. A. & D. R. BROOKS. 1990. Phylogenetic systematics as the basis of comparative biology. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany 73: 1-45.
32. GARBARY, D. J., K. S. RENZAGLIA & J. G. DUCKETT. 1993. The phylogeny of the land plants: a cladistic analysis based on male gametogenesis. Plant Systematics and Evolution 188: 237-269.
33. GRIFFIN III, D. & W. R. BUCK. 1989. Taxonomic and phylogenetic studies on the Bartramiaceae. THE BRYOLOGIST 92: 368-380.
34. HEDENÄS, L. 1987. On the taxonomic position of Tomenthypnum Loeske. Journal of Bryology 14: 729-736.
35. _. 1989. Axillary hairs in pleurocarpous mosses - a comparative study. Lindbergia 15: 166-180.
36. _. 1994. The basal pleurocarpous diplolepidous mosses - A cladistic approach. THE BRYOLOGIST 97: 225-243.
37. _. 1995. Higher taxonomic level relationships among diplolepidous pleurocarpous mosses - a cladistic overview. Journal of Bryology 18: 723-781.
38. _. 1996a. A cladistic evaluation of relationships between the Hookeriales, the Sematophyllaceae and some other taxa. Lindbergia 21: 49-82.
39. _. 1996b. A cladistic overview of the "Hookeriales." Lindbergia 21: 107-143.
40. _. 1998. Cladistic studies on pleurocarpous mosses: Research needs, and use of results, pp. 125-141. In J. W. Bates, N. W. Ashton & J. G. Duckett (eds.), Bryology for the Twenty-First Century. W. S. Maney & Son, Leeds.
41. HILLIS, D. M. 1993. Inferring complex phylogenies. Nature 383: 130-131.
42. _. 1995. Approaches for assessing phylogenetic accuracy. Systematic Biology 44: 3-16.
43. HUELSENBECK, J. P. 1991. Tree-length distribution skewness: an indicator of phylogenetic information. Systematic Zoology 40: 257-270.
44. KAWAI, I. 1968. Taxonomic studies on the midrib in Musci: 1. Significance of the midrib in systematic botany. Science Reports of Kanazawa University 13(2): 127-157.
45. _. 1977. Systematic studies on the conducting tissue of the gametophyte in Musci: 7. On the essential coordination among the anatomical characteristics of the stems in the some species of Isobryales. Science Reports of Kanazawa University 22(2): 197-305.
46. KOPONEN, T. 1968. Generic revision of the Mniaceae Mitt. (Bryophyta). Annales Botanici Fennici 5: 117-151.
47. _. 1988. The phylogeny and classification of Mniaceae and Rhizogoniaceae (Musci). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 64: 37-46.
48. KLASSEN, G. J., R. D. MOOI & A. LOCKE. 1991. Consistency indices and random data. Systematic Zoology 40: 446-457.
49. LA FARGE-ENGLAND, C. 1996. Growth form, branching pattern, and perichaetial position in mosses: cladocarpy and pleurocarpy redefined. THE BRYOLOGIST 99: 170-186.
50. LECOINTRE, G., H. PHILIPPE, HOC LANH VÂN LÊ & H. LE GUYADER. 1993. Species sampling has a major impact on phylogenetic inference. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2: 205-224.
51. LEITGEB, H. 1868. Beitrage zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Pflanzenorgane. I. Wachsthum des Stammches von Fontinalis antipyretica. Akademie der Wissenschaften Wien. Sitzungs berichte. Mathematisch-naturwessen schaftlichs Klasse 57: 308-342.
52. LEWINSKY, J. 1993. Monographic studies on Orthotrichum (Musci). Bryobrothera 2: 1-76.
53. LIN, S-H. 1983. A taxonomic revision of Phyllogoniaceae. Part 1. Journal of the Taiwan Museum 36: 37-86.
54. MADDISON, W. P. 1993. Missing data versus missing characters in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42: 576-581.
55. _ & D. R. MADDISON. 1992. MacClade version 3.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
56. MISHLER, B. D. & E. DE LUNA. 1991. The use of ontogenetic data in phylogenetic analyses of mosses. Advances in Bryology 4: 121-167.
57. NEWTON, A. E. 1993. Phylogenetic systematics of the tropical moss genus Pireella (Pterobryaceae: Musci). Ph.D. Dissertation, Duke University, Durham.
58. PATTERSON, C. 1982. Morphological characters and homology, pp. 21-74. In K. A. Joysey & A. E. Friday (eds.), Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction. Academic Press. London.
59. ROBINSON, H. 1971. A revised classification for the orders and families of mosses. Phytologia 21: 289-293.
60. _. 1985. Comments on the cladistic approach to the phylogeny of the "Bryophytes" by Mishler and Churchill. Brittonia 37: 279-281.
61. ROTH, D. 1969. Embryo und embryotheca bei der laubmoosen. Bibliotheca Botanica 129: 1-49.
62. SCHOFIELD, W. B. 1985. Introduction to Bryology. Macmillan, NY.
63. SCHUSTER, R. M. 1984. Evolution, phylogeny and classification of the Hepaticae, pp. 892-1070. In R. M. Schuster (ed.), New Manual of Bryology. The Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan.
64. SHARP, A. J., H. A. CRUM, & P. M. ECKEL. 1994. The Moss Flora of Mexico. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden, NY.
65. SHAW, A. J. & J. R. ROHRER. 1984. Endostomial architecture in diplolepidous mosses. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 57: 41-61.
66. _, L. E. ANDERSON & B. D. MISHLER. 1989. Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution. III. Funaria hygrometrica, Bryum pseudocapillare, and B. bicolor. Systematic Botany 14: 24-36.
67. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1990. PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. 3.1.1 ed. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.
68. VITT, D. H. 1981. Adaptive modes of the moss sporophyte. THE BRYOLOGIST 84: 166-186.
69. _. 1984. Classification of the Bryopsida, pp. 696-759. In R. M. Schuster (ed.), New Manual of Bryology. The Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan.
70. WAKE, D. B. & A. LARSON. 1987. Multidimensional analysis of an evolving lineage. Science 238: 42-48.
71. WIENS, J. J. 1998. Does adding characters with missing data increase or decrease phylogenetic accuracy? Systematic Biology 47: 625-640.
72. WITHEY, A. 1996a. Phylogenetic studies of the Spiridentaceae (Musci): Observations of three morphological characters associated with pleurocarpy. Anales del Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Serie Botánico 67: 5-14.
73. _. 1996b. Systematic studies of the Spiridentaceae (Musci). Ph.D. Dissertation, Duke University, Durham.
74. WHITTEMORE, A. & B. ALLEN. 1989. The systematic position of Adelothecium Mitt. and the familial classification of the Hookeriales (Musci). THE BRYOLOGIST 92: 261-272.