Growth form, branching pattern, and perichaetial position in Mosses: Cladocarpy and pleurocarpy redefined

Bryologist

Volumn 99, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 170-186

  La Farge England, Catherine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRYOPHYTA; HOOKERIALES; HYPNALES; SPIRIDENTACEAE;

EID: 0029958263     PISSN: 00072745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3244546     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. AKIYAMA, H. & N. NISHIMURA. 1993. Further studies on branch buds in mosses; "pseudoparaphyllia" and "scaly leaves". Journal of Plant Research 106: 101-108.
2. BERTHIER, J. 1972. Recherches sur la structure et le développment de l'apex du gamétophyte feuillé des mousses. Revue Bryologique et Lichénologique 38: 421-551.
3. BRIDEL, S. E. 1819. Muscologiae Recentiorum Supplementum Pars IV. Seu Mantissa naturae normam melius instituta et muscologiae recentiorum accomodata. Gothae.
4. _. 1826-1827. Bryologia universa seu Systematica ad Novam Methodum Dispositio, Historia et Descriptio omnium Muscorum Frondosorum Hucusque cognitorum cum Synonymia ex Auctoribus Probatissimis. Volumen Primum; Volumen Secundum. Leipzig.
5. BROTHERUS, V. F. 1901-1909. Musci (Laubmoose). III. Unterklasse Bryales: II. Spezieller Teil, pp. 277-1246. In A. Engler & K. Prantl (eds.), Die Natürlichen pflanzenfamilien 1(3,I,II). Leipzig.
6. _. 1924-1925. Musci (Laubmoose). Unterklasse Bryales: II Spezieller Teil. 10 Band, 1 Hälfte, pp. 143-478; 11 Band, 2 Hälfte, pp. 1-542. In A. Engler & K. Prantl (eds.), Die Natürlichen pflanzenfamilien. Leipzig.
7. BUCK, W. R. & D. H. VITT. 1986. Suggestions for a new classification of pleurocarps. Taxon 35: 21-60.
8. CAVERS, F. 1911. The inter-relationships of Bryophyta. The New Phytologist 9-10: 1-200.
9. CHAMBERLIN, M. A. 1980. The morphology and development of the gametophytes of Fissidens and Bryoxiphium (Bryophyta). M. Sc. Thesis, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.
10. CHOPRA, R. N. & P. K. KUMURA. 1988. Biology of Bryophytes. New Delhi.
11. CRANDALL, B. J. 1969. Morphology and development of branches in leafy Hepaticae. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia 30: 1-261.
12. CROSBY, M. R. 1980. The diversity and relationships of mosses, pp. 115-129. In R. J. Taylor & A. E. Leviton (eds.), The mosses of North America. Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science. California Academy of Science, San Francisco.
13. CRUM, H. A. 1986. A survey of the moss genus Sclerodontium. Hikobia 9: 289-295.
14. _ & L E. ANDERSON. 1981. The Mosses of Eastern North America. Vol. 1. New York.
15. DE LUNA, E. 1990. Developmental evidence of acrocarpy in Hedwigia ciliata (Musci: Hedwigiaceae). Tropical Bryology 2: 53-60.
16. _ 1995. The circumcription and phylogenetic relationships of the Hedwigiaceae (Musci). Systematic Botany 20: 347-373.
17. DEGUCHI, H. 1978. A revision of the genera Grimmia, Schistidium, and Coscinodon (Musci) of Japan. Journal of Science of the Hiroshima University Series B, Div. 2 (Botany) 16: 121-256.
18. DIXON, H. N. 1924. The Student's Handbook of British mosses. Eastbourne.
19. _. 1932. The Classification of Mosses, pp. 397-412. In F. Verdoorn (ed.), Manual of Bryology, The Hague.
20. DURING, H. 1979. Life strategies of bryophytes: a preliminary review. Lindbergia 5: 2-18.
21. _. 1990. Clonal growth patterns among bryophytes, pp. 153-176. In J. van Groenendael & H. de Kroon (eds), Clonal Growth in Plants: Regulation and Function, The Hague.
22. FLEISCHER, M. 1900-1923. Die Musci der Flora von Buitenzorg (Zugleich Laubmoosflora von Java). Vols. 1-4. Leiden.
23. FLOWERS, S. 1973. Mosses: Utah and the West. Provo, Utah.
24. FREY, W. 1971. Blattenwicklung bei Laubmoosen. Dissertation Tübingen, pp. 463-556. Lehre.
25. _. 1974. Vergleichende entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an Laubmoosbättern als Beitrag zur Systematik der Laubmoose. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France 121: 29-34.
26. GIESENHAGEN, K. 1910. Mosstypen der Regenwälder. Annales du Jardin botanique de Buitenzorg, Supplement 3: 711-790.
27. GIMINGHAM, G. H. & E. M. BIRSE. 1957. Ecological studies on growth form in bryophytes. I Correlations between growth form and habitat. Journal of Ecology. 45: 533-545.
28. HEDENAS, L. 1994. The basal pleurocarpous diplolepidous mosses. A cladistic approach. THE BRYOLOGIST 97: 225-243.
29. HORIKAWA, Y. & H. ANDO. 1952. A short study on growth-forms of bryophytes and its ecological significance. Hikobia 1: 119-129.
30. HORTON, D. G. 1982. A revision of the Encalyptaceae (Musci) with particular reference to the North American taxa Part I. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 53: 365-418.
31. IRELAND, R. R. 1971. Moss pseudoparaphyllia. THE BRYOLOGIST 74: 312-330.
32. _. 1982. Moss Flora of the Maritime Provinces. Publications in Botany, No. 13. National Museum of Natural Sciences, Ottawa.
33. IWATSUKI, Z. 1960. The epiphytic bryophyte communities in Japan. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 22: 159-348.
34. KOPONEN, T 1982. Rhizoid topography and branching patterns in moss taxonomy. Nova Hedwigia 71: 95-99.
35. _. 1988. The phylogeny and classification of Mniaceae and Rhizogoniaceae (Musci). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 64: 37-46.
36. LAWTON, E. 1971. Moss Flora of the Pacific Northwest. Nichinan, Japan.
37. LESQUEREUX, L. & T. P. JAMES. 1884. Manual of Mosses of North America. Boston.
38. LEWINSKY, J. 1993. A synopsis of the genus Orthotrichum Hedw. (Musci, Orthotrichaceae). Bryobrothera 2: 1-59.
39. MAGDEFRAU, K. 1982. Life forms of bryophytes, pp. 45-58. In A. E. J. Smith (ed.), Bryophyte Ecology, London.
40. MAGILL, R. E 1990. Glossarum Polyglottum Bryologiae: A multilingual glossary for bryology. Monographs In Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 13: 1-297.
41. MEUSEL, H. 1935. Wuchsformen und Wuchstypen der europäischen Laubmoose. Nova Acta Leopoldina Neue Folge 3: 123-277.
42. MILLER, H. A. 1971. An overview of the Hookeriales. Phytologia 21: 243-252.
43. MISHLER, B. D. & E. DE LUNA. 1991. The use of ontogenetic data in phylogenetic analyses of mosses. Advances in Bryology 4: 121-167.
44. MITTEN, W. 1859. Musci Indiae Orientalis. An enumeration of the mosses of the east Indies. Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society (London), Supplement Botany. 1: 1-171.
45. MUELLER, C. 1948. Synopsis Muscorum Frondosorum omnium hucusque cognitorum. Pars prima. Berolini.
46. NEES VON ESENBECK, C. G., FR. HORNSCHUCH, & J. STURM 1823. Bryologia Germanica, oder Beschreibung der in Deutschland und in der Schweiz washsenden Laubmoose. Erster Theil. Nürnberg.
47. NEWTON, A. E. & B. D. MISHLER. 1994. The evolutionary significance of asexual reproduction in mosses. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 76: 127-145.
48. NISHIMURA, N. 1985. A revision of the genus Ctenidium (Musci). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 58: 1-82.
49. PROCTOR, M. C. & A. J. E. SMITH. 1995. Ecological and systematic implications of branching patterns in bryophytes. Monographs In Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 53: 87-110.
50. RICHARDS, P. W. 1984. The ecology of tropical forest bryophytes, pp. 1233-1270 In R. M. Schuster (ed.), New Manual of Bryology, Vol. 2. Nichinan, Japan.
51. ROTHWELL, G. W. 1987. The role of development in plant phylogeny: a paleobotanical perspective. Review of Paleobotany and Palynology 50: 97-114.
52. SALAZAR-ALLEN. N. 1985. The life-form and presence of epigametophytic plants in the genus Leucophanes. THE BRYOLOGIST 88: 94-97.
53. SCHIMPER, W. P. 1860. Synopsis Muscorum Europaeorum praemissa introductione de elementis bryologicis tractante. Vol. 1. Introductio I-CLIX, Vol. II. Speciarum descriptio. Stuttgartiae.
54. SCHOFIELD, W. B. & C. HÉBANT. 1984. The morphology and anatomy of the moss gametophore, pp. 627-657. In R. M. Schuster (ed.), New Manual of Bryology, Vol. 2. Nichinan, Japan.
55. SMITH, A. E. J. 1978. The Moss Flora of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge.
56. STARK, L. R. 1985. Phenology and species concepts: A case study. THE BRYOLOGIST 88: 190-198.
57. STEARN, W. T. 1983. Botanical Latin. London.
58. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, ver. 3.1.1. Computor program distributed by the Illinois Natural history Survey, Champaign, Illinois.
59. TALLIS, J. H. 1959. Studies in the biology and ecology of Racomitrium lanuginosum Brid. II. Growth, reproduction and physiology. Journal of Ecology 47: 325-350.
60. TOUW, A. 1976. A taxonomic revision of Thuidium, Pelekium, and Rauiella in Africa south of the Sahara. Lindbergia 3: 135-195.
61. VITT, D. H. 1984. Classification of Bryopsida, pp. 696-759. In R. M. Schuster (ed.), New Manual of Bryology, Vol. 2 Nichinan, Japan.
62. _ & W. R. BUCK. 1984. The familial placement of Bryowijkia (Musci: Trachypodiaceae). Brittonia 36: 300-306.
63. WHITE, J. 1984. Plant metamerism, pp. 15-47. In R. Dirzo & J. Sarukhán (eds.), Perspectives on Plant Population Ecology, Sunderland, MA
64. ZANDER, R. 1993. Genera of the Pottiaceae: mosses of harsh environments. Bulletin of the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences 32: 1-378.
65. ZOMLEFER, W. 1993. A Revision of Rigodium (Musci: Rigodiaceae). THE BRYOLOGIST 96: 1-72.