The transition to pleurocarpy: A phylogenetic analysis of the main diplolepidous lineages based on rbcL sequences and morphology

Bryologist

Volumn 102, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 634-650

  De Luna, Efrain ^a   Newton, Angela E ^a,d   Withey, Alison ^b   Gonzalez, Dolores ^a   Mishler, Brent D ^c  

^a INSTITUTO DE ECOLOGÍA   (Mexico)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRYACEAE; BRYALES; BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES; DICRANUM SCOPARIUM; FUNARIA HYGROMETRICA; GRIMMIA APOCARPA; HEDWIGIACEAE; HOOKERIALES; HYPNALES; ORTHOTRICHACEAE; PTERIDOPHYTA; SPLACHNACEAE;

EID: 0033428203     PISSN: 00072745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3244253     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. ALBERT, V. A., B. D. MISHLER & M. W. CHASH. 1992. Character-state weighting for restriction site data in phylogenetic reconstruction, with an example from chloroplast DNA, pp. 369-403. In P. Soltis, D. Soltis and J. Doyle (eds.), Molecular Systematics of Plants. Chapman and Hall.
2. _, M. W. CHASE & B. D. MISHLER. 1993. Character-state weighting for cladistic analysis of protein-coding DNA sequences. Annals Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 752-766.
3. BOPP, S. L. & I. CAPESIUS. 1995. New aspects of the systematics of bryophytes. Naturwissenschaften 82: 193-194.
4. BREMER, K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10: 295-304.
5. BUCK, W. R. & D. H. VITT. 1986. Suggestions for a new familial classification of pleurocarpous mosses. Taxon 35: 21-60.
6. CARPENTER, J. M. 1992. Random cladistics. Cladistics 8: 147-153.
7. COX C. J. & T. A. HEDDERSON. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships among the ciliate arthrodontous mosses: evidence from chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 215: 119-139.
8. CRACRAFT, J. & K. HELM-BYCHOWSKI. 1991. Parsimony and phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: some methodological strategies, pp. 184-220. In M. M. Miyamoto & J. Cracraft (eds.). Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA sequences. Oxford University Press, NY.
9. CROSBY, M. R. 1980. The diversity and relationships of mosses, pp. 115-129. In R. J. Taylor & A. E. Leviton (eds.), The Mosses of North America. Pacific Division, AAAS, California Academy of Science, San Francisco.
10. DAVIS, J. I. 1993. Character removal as a means for assessing stability of clades. Cladistics 9: 201-210.
11. DE LUNA, E. 1992. Developmental and systematic studies in the Hedwigiaceae (Musci). Ph.D. Dissertation. Duke University, Durham, NC.
12. _. 1995. The circumscription and phylogenetic relationships of the Hedwigiaceae (Musci). Systematic Botany 20: 347-373.
13. DE QUEIROZ, A., M. J. DONOGHUE & J. KIM. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26: 657-681.
14. DOYLE, J. J. & J. L. DOYLE. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
15. DOYLE, J. A., M. J. DONOGHUE & E. A. ZIMMER. 1994. Integration of morphological and ribosomal RNA data on the origin of angiosperms. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 81: 419-450.
16. EERNISE, D. J. & A. G. KLUGE. 1993. Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and amniote phylogeny inferred from fossils, molecules and morphology. Molecular Biology and Evolution 10: 1170-1195.
17. FAITH, D. P. & P. S. CRANSTON. 1991. Could a cladogram this short have arisen by chance alone?: On permutation tests for cladistic structure. Cladistics 7: 1-28.
18. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phytogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
19. GRANZOW DE LA CERDA, I. 1990. Aplicación del método cladístico a un caso real: Análisis filogenético de Anumodon Hook & Tayl. (Musci). Jardín Botánico de Madrid 47: 305-325.
20. HEDENÄS, L. 1994. The basal pleurocarpous diplolepidous mosses - a cladistic approach. THE BRYOLOGIST 97: 225-243.
21. _. 1995. Higher taxonomic level relationships among diplolepidous pleurocarpous mosses - a cladistic overview. Journal of Bryology 18: 723-781.
22. _. 1996a. A cladistic evaluation of relationships between the Hookeriales, the Sematophyllaceae and some other taxa. Lindbergia 21: 49-82.
23. _. 1996b. A cladistic overview of the Hookeriales. Lindbergia 21: 107-143.
24. HILLIS, D. 1995. Approaches for assessing phylogenetic accuracy. Systematic Biology 44: 3-16.
25. HUELSENBECK, J. P. 1991. Tree-length distribution skewness: an indicator of phylogenetic information. Systematic Zoology 40: 257-270.
26. HYVÖNEN, J. & J. ENROTH. 1994. Cladistic analysis of the genus Pinnatella (Neckeraceae, Musci). THE BRYOLOGIST 97: 305-312.
27. KÄLLERSJÖ, M., J. S. FARRIS, A. G. KLUGE & C. BULT. 1992. Skewness and permutation. Cladistics 8: 275-287.
28. KLASSEN, G. J., R. D. MOOI & A. LOCKE. 1991. Consistency indices and random data. Systematic Zoology 40: 446-457.
29. KLUGE. A. G. & A. J. WOLF. 1993. Cladistics: What's in a word. Cladistics 9: 183-199.
30. KOPONEN, T. 1979. Generic and family concepts in the Mniaceae. Nova Hedwigia 71: 249-259.
31. LA FARGE-ENGLAND, C. 1996. Growth form, branching pattern, and perichaetial position in mosses: cladocarpy and pleurocarpy redefined. THE BRYOLOGIST 99: 170-186.
32. MADDISON, D. R. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious trees. Systematic Zoology 40: 315-328.
33. MEUSEL, H. 1935. Wuchsformen und Wuchstypen der europaischen Laubmoose. Nova Acta Leopoldina Neue Folge 3: 123-277.
34. MISHLER, B. D. & E. DE LUNA. 1991. The use of ontogenetic data in phylogenetic analyses of mosses. Advances in Bryology 4: 121-167.
35. _, M. J. DONOGHUE & V. A. ALBERT. 1991. The decay index as a measure of relative robustness within a cladogram. Abstract, Annual meeting, Willi Hennig Society. Toronto, Canada.
36. _, L. A. LEWIS, M. A. BUCHHEIM, K. S. RENZAGLIA, D. J. GARBARY, C. F. DELWICHE, F. W. ZECHMAN, T. S. KANTZ & R. L. CHAPMAN. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships of the "green algae" and "bryophytes". Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 81: 451-483.
37. _, P. THRALL, J. S. H. JR., E. DE LUNA & R. VILGALYS. 1992. A molecular approach to the phylogeny of bryophytes: cladistic analysis of chloroplast-encoded 16S and 23S ribosomal RNA genes. THE BRYOLOGIST 95: 172-180.
38. NAYLOR, G. J. P. 1992. Plotting frequency distributions of phylogenetic groupings found among sets of most parsimonious trees. Cladistics 8: 161-164.
39. NEWTON, A. 1993. Phylogenetic systematics of the tropical moss genus Pireella. Ph.D. Dissertation. Duke University, Durham, NC.
40. _ & E. DE LUNA. 1999. A survey of morphological characters for phylogenetic study of the transition to pleurocarpy. THE BRYOLOGIST 102: 651-682.
41. PRYER, K. M., A. R. SMITH & J. E. SKOG. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships of extant ferns based on evidence from morphology and rbcL sequences. American Fern Journal 85: 205-282.
42. ROBINSON, H. 1971. A revised classification for the orders and families of mosses. Phytologia 21: 289-293.
43. SANDERSON, M. J. 1989. Confidence limits on phylogenies: The bootstrap revisited. Cladistics 5: 113-129.
44. _. 1995. Objections to bootstrapping phylogenies: A critique. Systematic Biology 44: 299-320.
45. _ & M. J. DONOGHUE. 1989. Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy. Evolution 43: 1781-1795.
46. SCHOFIELD, W. B. & C. HÉBANT. 1984. The morphology and anatomy of the moss gametophore, pp. 627-657. In R. M. Schuster (ed.), New Manual of Bryology. The Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan, Japan.
47. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1993. PAUP (v. 3.1.1): Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.
48. VITT, D. H. 1982. Bryopsida, pp. 307-336. In S. P. Parker (ed.), Synopsis and Classification of Living Organisms. Vol. I. McGraw-Hill, NY.
49. _. 1984. Classification of the Bryopsida, pp. 696-759. In R. M. Schuster (ed.), New Manual of Bryology. Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan.
50. WATERS, D. A., M. A. BUCHHEIM, R. A. DEWEY & R. L. CHAPMAN. 1992. Preliminary inferences of the phylogeny of bryophytes from nuclear-encoded ribosomal RNA sequences. American Journal of Botany 79: 459-466.
51. WITHEY, A. 1996a. Phylogenetic studies of the Spiridentaceae (Musci): observations of three morphological characters associated with pleurocarpy. Anales Institute de Biología, UNAM, ser Botánica 67: 5-14.
52. _. 1996b. Systematic studies of the Spiridentaceae (Musci). Ph.D. Dissertation, Duke University, Durham, NC.
53. ZOMLEFER, W. B. 1993. A revision of Rigodium (Musci: Rigodiaceae). THE BRYOLOGIST 96: 1-72.