Comparison of neonatal transient evoked otoacoustic emission responses recorded with linear and quickscreen protocols

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 70-79

  Hatzopoulos, Stavros ^a   Tsakanikos, Michalis ^b   Grzanka, Antoni ^c   Ratynska, Joanna ^d   Martini, Alessandro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FERRARA   (Italy)

^b P AND A KYRIAKOU CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Greece)

^c WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^d INSTITUTE OF PHYSIOLOGY AND PATHOLOGY OF HEARING   (Poland)

Author keywords

Neonatal screening; Otoacoustic emissions; Time frequency analysis; Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HEARING ACUITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NEWBORN; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SPECTROSCOPY;

HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; NEONATAL SCREENING; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 0034076498     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00206090009073056     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. AHEAD. Newsletter of the European Concerted Action on Otoacoustic. Emissions 1995; 1: 1–4
2. Kemp D T, Bray P B, Alexander L, Brown A M. Acoustic emission cochleography practical aspects. Scand Audiol Suppl 1986; 25: 71–94
3. Kemp D T, Ryan S. The use of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonatal hearing screening programs. Semin Hear 1993; 14: 3C, M-5
4. White K R, Vohr B R, Behrens T R. Universal newborn hearing screening using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: results of the Rhode Island Hearing Assessment Project. Semin Hear 1993; 14: 18–29
5. Maxon A B, White K R, Behrens T R, Vohr B R. Referral rates and cost efficiency in a universal newborn hearing screening program using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Am Acad Audiol 1995; 6: 271–277
6. Dirckx J JJ, Daemers K, Somers T H, Offeciers F E, Govaerts P J. Numerical assessment of TEOAE screening results: currently used criteria and their effect on TEOAE prevalence figures. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996; 116: 672–679
7. Thornton A R. High rate otoacoustic emissions. J AcoustSocAm 1993; 94: 132–136
8. Thornton A R, Folkard T J, Chambers J D. Technical aspects of recording evoked otoacoustic emissions using maximum length sequences. Scand Audiol 1994; 23: 225–231
9. Johannesen P T, Rasmussen A N, Osterhammel P A. Instrumentation for transient evoked otoacoustic emissions elicited by maximum length sequences. Scand Audiol 1998; 27: 37–42
10. Hatzopoulos S, Cheng J, Grzanka A, Morlet T, Martini A. Optimization of TEOAE recording protocols: a linear protocol derived from parameters of a time-frequency analysis: a pilot study on neonatal subjects. Scand Audiol 2000; 29: 21–27
11. Hatzopoulos S, Petruccelli J, Pelosi G, Martini A. A TEOAE screening protocol based on linear click stimuli: performance and scoring criteria. Acta Otolaryngol 1999; 119: 135–139
12. Grandori F, Ravazzani P, Tognola G, Hatzopoulos S. Some factors influencing the recording and the interpretation of otoacoustic emissions evoked at different click intensity levels. Advances in otoacoustic emissions, R, Thornton, F, Grandori. Casa Editrice Stefanoni, Milan 1994; vol. 2: 48–64
13. Grandori F, Ravazzani P, Tognola G, Hatzopoulos S. Derived non-linear versus linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Advances in otoacoustic emissions, R, Thornton, F, Grandori. Casa Editrice Stefanoni, Vol J Milan 1994; 48–64
14. Culpepper N B. Neonatal screening via otoacoustic emissions. Otoacoustic emissions and clinical applications, M S, Robinette, T J, Glattke. Thieme, New York 1997; 233–270
15. Hood J L, Berlin C T, Hurley A, Wen H. Suppression of otoacoustic emissions in normal hearing individuals. Hair cells and hearing aids, C, Berlin. Singular, San Diego 1996; 57–72
16. Hatzopoulos S, Cheng J, Grzanka A, Martini A. Time-frequency analyses of TEOAE recordings from normals and SNHL cases. Audiology 2000; 39: 1–12
17. Qian S, Chen D. Discrete Gabor Transform. IEEE Trans Signal Processing 1993; 41: 2429–2439
18. Qian S, Chen D. Decomposition of the Wigner-Ville distribution and time-frequency distribution series. IEEE Trans Signal Processing 1994; 42: 2836–2841
19. Gorga M P, Neely S T, Bergman B, Beauchaine K L, Kaminslkei J R, Peters J, Jesteadt W. A comparison of transient-evoked and distortion product emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 2639–2648
20. Prieve B A, Gorga M P, Schmidt A, Neely S T, Peters J, Schulte L, Jesteadt W. Analysis of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal hearing and hearing impaired ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 93: 3308–3319
21. Welzl-Muller K, Stephan K. Confirmation of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions based on user-independent criteria. Audiology 1994; 33: 28–36
22. Bray P. Click evoked otoacoustic emissions and the development of a clinical otoacoustic hearing test instrument. University College and Middlesex School of Medicine, London, Doctoral dissertation 1989
23. Lutman M E, Jennings K, Davis A C, Houston H G, Meredith R. Coloration of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions by characteristics of the recording apparatus. Advances in otoacoustic emissions, F, Grandori, L, Collet, D, Kemp, G, Salomon, K, Shorn, R, Thornton. Casa Editrice Stefanoni, Milan 1994; vol. 1: 48–64
24. Osterhammel P A, Rasmussen A N, Olsen S, Nielsen L H. The influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions on the amplitude of transient-evoked emissions. Scand Audiol 1996; 25: 187–192
25. Rasmussen A N, Osterhammel P A, Johannesen P T, Borgkvist B. Neonatal hearing screening using otoacoustic emissions elicited by maximum length sequences. Br J Audiol 1998; 32: 355–366
26. − . the use of spectral discriminant functions in the identification and classification of hearing loss. Audiol Neurol Otol 1998; 3: 402–418