Numerical assessment of TOAE screening results: Currently used criteria and their effect on TOAE prevalence figures

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 116, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 672-679

  Dirckx, J J J ^a,b   Daemers, K ^a   Somers, Th ^a   Offeciers, F E ^a   Govaerts, P J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b SINT AUGUSTINUS HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Neonatal; Oto acoustic emissions; Specificity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEARING DISORDER; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEWBORN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCREENING TEST; SPONTANEOUS OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION;

EID: 0029780290     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00016489609137906     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Kemp DT. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 64: 1386-91.
2. Wit HP, Ritsma RJ. Stimulated acoustic emissions from the human ear. J Acoust Soc Am 1979; 66: 911-3.
3. Johnsen NJ, Elberling C. Evoked acoustic emissions from the human ear I. Equipment and response parameters. Scand Audiol 1982; 11: 3-12.
4. Probst R, Coats AC, Martin GK, Lonsbury-Martin BL. Spontaneous, click- and toneburst-evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal ears. Hear Res 1986; 21: 261-75.
5. Bonfils P, Bertrand Y, Uziel A. Evoked otoacoustic emissions: normative data and presbycusis. Audiology 1988; 27: 27-35.
6. Stevens JC, Ip CB. Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal and hearing impaired adults. Br J Audiol 1988; 22: 45-9.
7. Rutten WLC. Evoked acoustic emissions from within the normal and abnormal human ears: comparison with audiometric and electrocochleographic findings. Hear Res 1980; 2: 263-71.
8. Grandori F. Evoked otoacoustic emissions stimulus-response relationship. Revue Laryngol (Bordeaux) 1983; 104: 153-5.
9. Zwicker E. Delayed evoked otoacoustic emissions and their suppression by Gaussian-shaped pressure impulses. Hear Res 1983; 2: 359-71.
10. Dijk P Van, Wit HP The occurrence of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing ears. Scand Audiol 1987; 16: 62-4.
11. Elberling C, Parbo J, Johnsen NJ. Evoked acoustic emission: clinical application. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1985; Suppl 421: 77-85.
12. Johnsen NJ, Bagi P, Parbo J, Elberling C. Evoked acoustic emissions from the human ear IV. Final results in 100 neonates. Scand Audiol 1988; 17: 27-34.
13. Bonfils P, Dumont A, Marie P, Francois M, Narcy P. Evoked otoacoustic emissions in newborn hearing screening. Laryngoscope 1990; 100: 186-9.
14. Kok MR, Van Zanten GA, Brocaar MP, Wallenburg HCS. Click-evoked oto-acoustic emissions in 1036 ears of heathy newborns. Audiology 1993; 32: 213-24.
15. Stevens JC, Webb HD, Hutchinson JT, Buffin JT, Smith MF. Click evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonatal screening. A preliminary analysis of an 8 year study. Advances in Otoacoustic Emissions 1994; 1: 124-30.
16. Meredith R, Stephens D, Hogan S, Cartlidge P, Drayton M. Screening for hearing loss in an at-risk neonatal poulation using evoked otoacoustic emissions. Scand Audiol 1994; 187-93.
17. Salomon G, Anthonissen B, Groth J, et al. Pilot study preceding a systematic screening of newborns based on evoked otoacoustic emissions. Advances in Otoacoustic Emissions 1994; 1: 131-40.
18. Kemp D, Ryan S. Otoacoustic emission tests in neonatal screening programmes. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh); Supp 482: 73-84.
19. Don M, Elberling C, Warring M. Objective detection of average auditory brainstem responses. Scand Audiol 1984; 13: 219-28.
20. Kemp D, Siobhan R, Bray P. A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 2, 93-105.