Time-frequency analyses of TEOAE recordings from normals and SNHL patients

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 1-12

  Hatzopoulos, Stavros ^a   Cheng, Jun ^b   Grzanka, Antoni ^c   Martini, Alessandro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FERRARA   (Italy)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Adaptive spectrogram; Emissions; Gabor spectrogram; Linear and non linear stimulus; Otoacoustic emissions; Protocols; Sensorineural hearing loss; Time frequency distributions; Transient evoked otoacoustic

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; HEARING; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0034075017     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00206090009073048     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Kemp D T, Bray P B, Alexander L, Brown A M. Acoustic emission cochleography–practical aspects. ScandAudiol 1986; 25: 71–94, Suppl
2. Bonfils P, Uziel A. Clinical applications of evoked otoacoustic emissions: results in normally hearing and hearing impaired subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989; 98: 326–331
3. Kemp D T, Ryan S, Bray P. Otoacoustic emission analysis and interpretation for clinical purposes. Cochlear mechanisms and otoacoustic emissions, F, Grandori, G, Ciafrone, D T, Kemp. Karger, Basil 1990; 77–98
4. Lutman M E, Mason S M, Sheppard S, Gibbin K P. Differential diagnosis potential of otoacoustic emissions: a case study. Audiology 1989; 28: 205–210
5. Prieve B A. Otoacoustic emissions in infants and children. Basic characteristics and clinical applications. Semin Hear 1992; 13: 37–52
6. Grandori F, Ravazzani P, Tognola G, Hatzopoulos S. Some factors influencing the recording and the interpretation of otoacoustic emissions evoked at different click intensily levels. Advances in otoacoustic emission, R, Thornton, F, Grandori. Casa Editrice Stefanoni, Vol II Milano 1994; 48–64
7. Dallos P. The role of the outer hair cells in cochlear function. Contemporary sensory neurobiology, M, Correia, A, Perachio. Liss, New York 1989; 207–230
8. Hudspeth A J. Models for mechanoelectrical transduction by hair cells. Contemporary sensory neurobiology, M, Correia, A, Perachio. Liss, New York 1989; 193–205
9. White K R, Vohr B R, Behrens T R. Universal newborn hearing screening using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: results of the Rhode Island Hearing Assessment project. Semin Hear 1993; 14: 18–29
10. European Consensus on Neonatal Screening statement. Milan 1998, May 15-16
11. Fukazawa T. Evoked otoacoustic emissions in a nonlinear model of the cochlea. Hear Res 1992; 59: 17–24
12. Strube H. Evoked otoacoustic emissions as cochlear Bragg reflections. Hear Res 1989; 38: 35–46
13. Zweig G, Shera C. The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. J AcoustSocAm 1995; 98: 2018–2047
14. Wit H P, Ritsma R J. Evoked acoustical responses from the human ear: some experimental results. Hear Res 1980; 2: 253–261
15. Chen D, Durand L G, Lee H C, Petitjean M, Bellemare F. Time-frequency analysis of the muscle sound of the human diaphragm. Med Biol Eng Comput 1997; 35: 649–665
16. Lu Y, Loshi S. Noise reduction for NMR FID signals via Gabor expansion. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1997; 44: 512–528
17. Richard C, Lengelle R. Joint time and time-frequency optimal detection of K-complexes in sleep EEG. Comput Biomed Res 1998; 31: 209–229
18. Stiber B Z, Sato S. Visualization of EEG using time-frequency distributions. Methods Inf Med 1997; 36: 298–301
19. Cheng J. Time frequency analysis of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions via smoothed pseudo-Wigner distribution. ScandAudiol 1995; 24: 91–96
20. Qian S, Chen D. Decomposition of the Wigner-Ville distribution and time-frequency distribution series. IEEE Trans Signal Processing 1994; 42: 2836–2841
21. Qian S, Chen D. Discrete Gabor transform. IEEE Trans Signal Processing 1993; 41: 2429–2439
22. Özdamar Ö, Zhang J, Kalayci T, Ülgen Y. Time frequency distribution of evoked otoacoustic emissions. Br J Audiol 1997; 31: 461–471
23. Qian S, Chen D. Signal representation using adaptive normalized Gaussian functions. Signal Processing 1994; 36: 1–11
24. Mallat S, Zhang Z. Matching pursuit with time-frequency dictionaries. IEEE Trans Signal Processing 1993; 41: 3397–3415
25. Hatzopoulos S, Mazzoli M, Martini A. Identification of hearing loss using TEOAE-based descriptors: preliminary results. Audiology 1995; 34: 248–259
26. Welzl-Muller K, Stephan K. Confirmation of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions based on user-independent criteria. Audiology 1994; 33: 28–36
27. Dirckx J JJ, Daemers K, Somers T H, Offccicrs F E, Govacrts P J. Numerical assessment of TEOAE screening results: currently used criteria and their effect on TEOAE prevalence figures. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996; 116: 672–679
28. Whitehead M L, Jimenez A M, Stagner B B, McCoy M J, Lons bury-Martin B L, Martin G K. Time-windowing of click-cvoked-otoacoustic emissions to increase signal-to-noise-ratio. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 599–611
29. Collet L, Vcuillet E, Chanal J M, Morgon A. Evoked otoacoustic emissions correlates between spectrum analysis and audiogram. Audiology 1991; 30: 164–172
30. Hatzopoulos S, Prosser S, Mazzoli M, Rosignoli M, Martini A. On the clinical applicability of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs): the use of spectral discriminant functions in the identification and classification of hearing loss. Audiol Neuro-Otol 1998; 3: 402–418
31. Kemp D T. Otoacoustic emissions, traveling waves and cochlear mechanisms. Hear Res 1980; 2: 533–548
32. Hatzopoulos S, Cheng J, Grzanka A, Morlet T, Martini M. On the optimization of the TEOAE recording protocols, A linear protocol derived from parameters of a time-frequency analysis. Data from neonatal subjects. Scand Audiol, (in press)
33. Norton S J, Widen J E. Evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal hearing infants and children–emerging data and issues. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 121–127
34. Collet L, Disant F, Morgon A. Effect of age in otoacoustic emissions. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol Bord 1989; 110: 67–68
35. O-Uchi T, Kanzaki J, Satoh Y, et al. Agc-rclated changes in evoked otoacoustic emission in normal hearing ears. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 1994; 514: 89–94
36. Gorga M P, Neely S T, Bergman B, et al. A comparison of transient-evoked and distortion product emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 2639–2648
37. Prieve B A, Gorga M P, Schmidt A, et al. Analysis of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal hearing and hearing impaired ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 93: 3308–3319
38. Reshef I, Attias J, Furst M. Characteristics of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and with noise-induced hearing loss. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 387–395
39. Attias J, Furst M, Furman V, Reshef T, Horowitz G, Bresloff T. Noise-induced otoacoustic emission loss with or without hearing loss. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 612–618
40. Kemp D T. Otoacoustic emissions in perspective. Otoacoustic emissions and clinical applications, M S, Robinette, T J, Glattke. Thieme, New York 1997; 14–18
41. Harris F P, Probst R. Otoacoustic emissions and au-diometric outcomes. Otoacoustic emissions and clinical applications, M S, Robinette, T J, Glattke. Thieme, New York 1997; 151–180
42. Meyer-Bisch C. Audioscan: a high-definition audiometry technique based on constant-level frequency sweeps–a new method with new hearing indicators. Audiology 1996; 35: 63–72