Optimization of TEOAE recording protocols. A linear protocol derived from parameters of a time-frequency analysis: a pilot study on neonatal subjects

Scandinavian Audiology

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 21-27

  Hatzopoulos, S ^a   Cheng, J ^b   Grzanka, A ^c   Morlet, T ^d   Martini, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FERRARA   (Italy)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^d EDOUARD HERRIOT HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Gabor spectrogram; Linear and nonlinear protocols; Otoacoustic emissions; TEOAEs; Time frequency distributions

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EUROPE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; LABORATORY APPARATUS, EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; LATENT PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEWBORN; NEWBORN SCREENING; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SOUND DETECTION;

EID: 0033973699     PISSN: 01050397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/010503900424561     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. AHEAD. Newsletter of the European Conceited Action on Otoacoustic Emissions, 1995, No 7: 1-4.
2. Brass D, Kemp DT. The objective assessment of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates. Ear Hear 1994;15:371-7.
3. Cheng J Time frequency analysis of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions via smoothed pseudo-Wigner distribution. Scand Audiol 1995;24:91-6.
4. Dirckx JJJ, Daemers K, Somers Th, Offeciers FE, Govaerts PJ. Numerical assessment of TEOAE screening results: currently used criteria and their effect on TEOAE prevalence figures. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996;116:672-9.
5. Grandori F, Ravazzani P, Tognola G, Hatzopoulos S Some factors influencing the recording and the interpretation of otoacoustic emissions evoked at different click intensity levels", in R. Thornton and F. Grandori (editors). Advances in otoacoustic emission. Vol II: Lecco: Casa Editrice Stefanoni, 1994a;48-64.
6. Grandori F, Ravazzani P, Tognola G, Hatzopoulos S. Derived nonlinear versus linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. In: Grandori F, Collet L, Kemp D, Salomon G, Shorn K, Thornton R (editors). Advances in otoacoustic emission. Vol I: Lecco: Casa Editrice Stefanoni, 1994b;48-64.
7. Kemp DT, Bray PB, Alexander L, Brown AM. Acoustic emission cochleography-practical aspects. Scand Audiol 1986;(Suppl 25):71-94.
8. Qian S, Chen D. Discrete Gabor transform. IEEE Trans. Signal Processing 1993;41:2429-39.
9. Qian S, Chen D. Decomposition of the Wigner-Ville distribution and time-frequency distribution series. IEEE Trans. Signal Processing 1994;42:2836-41.
10. Thornton AR. High rate otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Am 1993;94:132-6.
11. Thornton AR, Folkard TJ, Chambers JD. Technical aspects of recording evoked otoacoustic emissions using maximum length sequences. Scand Audiol 1994;23:225-31.
12. Welzl-Müller K, Stephan K. Confirmation of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions based on user-independent criteria. Audiology 1994;33:28-36.
13. White KR, Vohr BR, Behrens TR. Universal newborn hearing screening using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: Results of the Rhode Island hearing assessment project. Sem In Hear 1993;14:18-29.
14. Whitehead ML, Jimenez AM, Stagner BB, McCoy MJ, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. Time-windowing of click-evoked-otoacoustic emissions to increase signal-to-noise-ratio. Ear Hear 1995;16:599-611.