The value of high-pass resolution perimetry in glaucoma

Current Opinion in Ophthalmology

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 85-89

  Chauhan, Balwantray C ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ASSISTED PERIMETRY; CONTRAST; CORNEA; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; NEUROOPHTHALMOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; REVIEW; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL SYSTEM;

GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; PERIMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0034070873     PISSN: 10408738     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00055735-200004000-00003     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Frisén L: A computer-graphics visual field screener using high-pass spatial frequency resolution targets and multiple feedback devices. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1987, 49:441-446.
2. Frisen L: High-pass resolution targets in peripheral vision. Ophthalmology 1987, 94:1104-1108.
3. Frisen L: High-pass resolution perimetry: central-field neuroretinal correlates. Vision Res 1995, 35:293-301.
4. Curcio CA, Allen KA: Topography of ganglion cells in human retina. J Comp Neurol 1990, 300:5-25.
5. Lindblom B: Effects of laser-induced retinal lesions on perimetric thresholds. Doc Ophthalmol 1992, 79:241-252.
6. Frisén L: High-pass resolution perimetry. Evidence for parvocellular neural channel dependence. Neuro-ophthalmology 1992, 4:257-264.
7. Frien L: High-pass resolution perimetry. A clinical review. Doc Ophthalmol 1993, 83:1-25.
8. Bengtsson B, Olsson J, Heijl A, Rootzen H: A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1997, 75: 368-375.
9. Chauhan BC, Mohandas RN, Whelan JH, McCormick TA: Comparison of reliability indices in conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry. Ophthalmology 1993, 100:1089-1094.
10. Sample PA, Ahn DS, Lee PC, Weinreb RN: High-pass resolution perimetry in eyes with ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1992, 113:309-316.
11. Martinez GA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN: Comparison of high-pass resolution perimetry and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1995, 119:195-201.
12. Graham SL, Drance SM, Chauhan BC, Swindale NV, Hnik P, Mikelberg FS, et al.: Comparison of psychophysical and electrophysiological testing in early glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996, 37:2651-2662.
13. Dannheim F, Abramo F, Verlohr D: Comparison of automated conventional and spatial resolution perimetry in glaucoma. In: Heijl A, ed. Perimetry Update 1988/89. Berkeley: Kugler and Ghedini; 1989:383-392.
14. Chauhan BC, LeBlanc RP, McCormick TA, Rogers JB: Comparison of high-pass resolution perimetry and pattern discrimination perimetry to conventional perimetry in glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol 1993, 28:306-311.
15. Kono Y, Chi QM, Tomita G, Yamamoto T, Kitazawa Y: High-pass resolution perimetry and a Humphrey Field Analyzer as indicators of glaucomatous optic disc abnormalities. A comparative study. Ophthalmology 1997, 104:1496-1502.
16. Dannheim F, Roggenbuck C: Comparison of automated conventional and spatial resolution perimetry in chiasmal lesions. In: Heijl A, ed. Perimetry Update 1988/89. Berkeley: Kugler and Ghedini; 1989:377-382.
17. Wall M: High-pass resolution perimetry in optic neuritis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991, 32:2525-2529.
18. Chauhan BC, House PH, McCormick TA, LeBlanc RP: Comparison of conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry in a prospective study of patients with glaucoma and healthy controls. Arch Ophthalmol 1999, 117:24-33.
19. Douglas GR, Drance SM, Mikelberg FS, Schulzer M, Wijsman K: Variability of the Frisén Ring Perimeter. In: Heijl A, ed. Perimetry Update 1988/89. Berkeley: Kugler and Ghedini; 1989:197-198.
20. Chauhan BC, House PH: Intratest variability in conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry. Ophthalmology 1991, 98:79-83.
21. House P, Schulzer M, Drance S, Douglas G: Characteristics of the normal central visual field measured with resolution perimetry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1991, 229:8-12.
22. Wall M, Lefante J, Conway M: Variability of high-pass resolution perimetry in normals and patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991, 32:3091-3095.
23. House PH, Cooper RL, Bulsara M: Comparing long-term variability using the Humphrey Field Analyzer and the Ring Perimeter in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. In: Mills RP, ed. Perimetry Update 1992/93. Amsterdam: Kugler Publications; 1993:20-23.
24. Flammer J, Drance SM, Fankhauser F, Augustiny L: Differential light threshold in automated static perimetry. Factors influencing short-term fluctuation. Arch Ophthalmol 1984, 102:876-879.
25. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J: Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol 1987, 105:1544-1549.
26. Marraffa M, Pucci V, Marchini G, Morselli S, Bellucci R, Bonomi L: HPR perimetry and Humphrey perimetry in glaucomatous children. Doc Ophthalmol 1995, 89:383-386.
27. Martin L, Wanger P: Five-year follow-up of treated patients with glaucoma using resolution perimetry. J Glaucoma 1998, 7:22-26.
28. Popovic V, Sjostrand J: Course of exfoliation and simplex glaucoma after primary trabeculectomy. Br J Ophthalmol 1999, 83:305-310.