Process evaluation in a multisite, primary obesity-prevention trial in American Indian schoolchildren

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Volumn 69, Issue 4 SUPPL., 1999, Pages

  Helitzer, Deborah L ^a   Davis, Sally M ^b   Gittelsohn, Joel ^b   Going, Scott B ^b   Murray, David M ^b   Snyder, Patricia ^b   Steckler, Allan B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

American Indians; Children; Diffusion theory; Intervention study; Process evaluation; Qualitative research; Social learning theory

Indexed keywords

AMERICAN INDIAN; ARTICLE; CATERING SERVICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FAMILY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; METHODOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; OBESITY; PHYSICAL EDUCATION; PILOT STUDY; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; SCHOOL CHILD; SOCIAL LEARNING;

EID: 0032901498     PISSN: 00029165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/69.4.816s     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Dignan MB. Measurement and evaluation of health education. 3rd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, 1995.
2. Israel BA, Cummings KM, Dignan MB, et al. Evaluation of health education programs: current assessment and future directions. Health Educ Q 1995;22:364-89.
3. Windsor RA, Baranowksi T, Clark N, Cutter G. Evaluation of health promotion and education programs. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Co, 1994.
4. McGraw SA, Stone EJ, Osganian SK, et al. Design of process evaluation within the Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH). Health Educ Q 1994;suppl 2:S5-26.
5. Steckler A. The use of qualitative evaluation methods to test internal validity. Eval Health Prof 1989;12:115-33.
6. Sorenson G, Thompson B, Glanz K, et al. Work site-based cancer prevention: primary results from the working well trial. Am J Public Health 1996;86:939-47.
7. Goodman RM, Wandersman A. FORECAST: a formative approach to evaluating community coalitions and community based initiatives. J Community Psychol 1994;6-25.
8. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. New York: Free Press, 1995.
9. Perry CL, Baranowski T, Parcel G. How individuals, environments, and health behavior interact: social learning theory. In: Glanz K, Lewis RM, Rimer B, eds. Health behavior and health education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1990:161-86.
10. Steckler A, McLeroy KR, Goodman RM, Bird ST, McCormick L. Toward integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: an introduction. Health Educ Q 1992;19:1-9.
11. Helitzer-Allen D, Kendall C. Explaining differences between qualitative and quantitative data: a study of chemoprophylaxis during pregnancy. Health Educ Q 1992;19:41-54.
12. Stevens J, Cornell CE, Story M, et al. Development of a questionnaire to assess knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors in American Indian children. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69(suppl):773S-81S.
13. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: a sourcebook of new methods. Newbury Park, NJ: Sage Publications, 1984.
14. Davis SM, Going SB, Helitzer DL, et al. Pathways: a culturally appropriate obesity-prevention program for American Indian schoolchildren. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69(suppl):796S-802S.
15. McKenzie TL, Sallis JF, Nader PR. SOFIT: system for observing fitness instruction time. J Teach Phys Educ 1991;11:195-205.
16. Sallis JF, McKenzie TL, Alcaraz JE, Kolody B, Hovell MF, Nader PR. Project SPARK: effects of physical education on adiposity in children. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1993;699:127-36.
17. Snyder P, Anliker J, Cunningham-Sabo L, et al. The Pathways study: a model for lowering the fat in school meals. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69(suppl):810S-5S.