Comparison of imaging methods for renal artery stenosis

BJU International, Supplement

Volumn 86, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 84-94

  Grenier, N ^a   Trillaud, H ^a  

^a HÔPITAL PELLEGRIN   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAPTOPRIL; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIPEPTIDYL CARBOXYPEPTIDASE INHIBITOR; PENTETATE TECHNETIUM TC 99M; TECHNETIUM 99M;

ANATOMY; ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; HUMAN; IMAGING; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; KIDNEY BLOOD FLOW; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RENOVASCULAR HYPERTENSION; REVASCULARIZATION; REVIEW;

EID: 0033917839     PISSN: 14655101     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00581.x     Document Type: Review

References (75)

1. Working Group on Renovascular Hypertension. Detection, evaluation and treatment of renovascular hypertension. Arch Int Med 1987; 147: 820-9
2. Davidson RA, Wilcox CS. Newer tests for the diagnosis of renovascular disease. JAMA 1992; 268: 3553-8
3. Zierler RE, Bergelin RO, Isaacson JA, Strandness DE Jr. Nutural history of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: a prospective study with duplex ultrasonography. J Vasc Surg 1994; 19: 250-8
4. Maxwell MH, Bleifer KH, Franklin SS, Varady PO. Cooperative study of renovascular hypertension. Demographic analysis of the study. J Am Med Assoc 1972; 220: 1195-20
5. Hillman BJ. Imaging advances in the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension. Am J Roentgenol 1989; 153: 5-14
6. Verschuyl EJ, Kaatee R, Beek FJA et al. Renal artery origins: location and distribution in the transverse plane at CT. Radiology 1997; 203: 71-5
7. Beregi JP, Mauroy B, Willoteaux S, Mounier-Vehier C, Rémy-Jardin M, Francke JP. Anatomic variation in the origin of the main renal arteries: spiral CTA evaluation. Eur Radiol 1999; 9: 1330-4
8. Dunnick NR, Svetkey LP, Cohan RH et al. Intravenous digital subtraction renal angiography: use in screening for renovascular hypertension. Radiology 1989; 171: 219-22
9. Mann SJ, Pickering TG. Detection of renovascular hypertension. State of the art. Ann Intern Med 1992; 117: 845-53
10. Kohler TR, Zierler RE, Martin RL et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of renal artery stenosis by ultrasonic duplex scanning. J Vasc Surg 1986; 4: 450-6
11. Taylor DC, Kettler MD, Moneta GL et al. Duplex ultrasound scanning in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: a prospective evaluation. J Vasc Surg 1988; 7: 363-9
12. Hélénon O, El Rody F, Correas JM et al. Color Doppler US of renovascular disease in native kidneys. Radiographics 1995; 15: 833-54
13. Hoffmann U, Edwards JM, Carter S et al. Role of duplex scanning for the detection of atherosclerotic renal artery disease. Kidney Int 1991; 39: 1232-9
14. Strandness DE. Duplex imaging for the detection of renal artery stenosis. Am J Kidney Dis 1994; 24: 674-8
15. Karasch T, Strauss AL, Grün B et al. Farbkodierte Duplex-sonographie in der Diagnostik von Nierenarterienstenosen. Deutsche Med Wochenschr 1993; 118: 1429-36
16. Olin JW, Piedmonte MR, Young JR, DeAnna S, Grubb M, Childs MB. The utility of duplex ultrasound scanning of the renal arteries for diagnosing significant renal artery stenosis. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122: 833-8
17. Berland LL, Koslin DB, Routh WD, Keller FS. Renal artery stenosis: Prospective evaluation of diagnosis with color duplex US compared with angiography. Radiology 1990: 174: 421-3
18. Desberg AL, Paushter DM, Lammert GK et al. Renal artery stenosis: Evaluation with color Doppler flow imaging. Radiology 1990; 177: 749-53
19. Stavros AT, Parker SH, Yakes WF et al. Segmental stenosis of the renal artery: Pattern recognition of tardus and parvus abnormalities with duplex sonography. Radiology 1992; 184: 487-92
20. Patriquin HB, Lafortune M, Jequier JC et al. Stenosis of the renal artery: assessment of slowed systole in the downstream circulation with Doppler sonography. Radiology 1992; 184: 479-85
21. Ozbek SS, Aytac SK, Erden MI, Sanlidilek NU. Intrarenal Doppler findings of upstream renal artery stenosis: a preliminary report. Ultrasound Med Biol 1993; 19: 3-12
22. Halpern EJ, Needleman L, Nack TL, East SA. Renal artery stenosis: should we study the main renal artery or segmental vessels? Radiology 1995; 195: 799-804
23. Schwerk WB, Restrepo IK, Stellwaag M, Klose KJ, Schade-Brittinger C. Renal artery stenosis: Grading with image-directed Doppler US evaluation of renal resistive index. Radiology 1994; 190: 785-90
24. Kliewer MA, Tupler RH, Carroll BA et al. Renal artery stenosis: analysis of Doppler waveform parameters and lardus-parvus pattern. Radiology 1993; 189: 779-87
25. Lafortune M, Patriquin ITB, Demeule E et al. Renal arterial stenosis: slowed systole in the downstream circulation -experimental study in dogs. Radiology 1992; 184: 475-8
26. Kliewer MA, Tupler RH, Hertzberg BS et al. Doppler evaluation of renal artery stenosis: interobserver agreement in the interpretation of waveform morphology. Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162: 1371-6
27. Gottlieb RH, Snitzer EL, Hartley DF, Fultz PJ, Rubens DJ. Interobserver and intraobserver variation in determining intrarenal parameters by Doppler sonography. Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 627-31
28. Van der Hulst VPM, Van Baalen J, Schultze Kool L et al. Renal artery stenosis: endovascular flow wire study for validation of Doppler US. Radiology 1996; 200: 165-8
29. Bude RO, Rubin JM, Platt JF, Fechner KP, Adler RS. Pulsus tardus: its cause and potential limitations in detection of arterial stenosis. Radiology 1994; 190: 779-84
30. Bude RO, Rubin JM. Detection of renal artery stenosis with Doppler sonography: it is more complicated than originally thought. Radiology 1995; 196: 612-3
31. René PC, Oliva VL, Bui BT et al. Renal artery stenosis: Evaluation of Doppler US after inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme with captopril. Radiology 1995; 196: 675-9
32. Oliva VL, Soulez G, Lesage D et al. Detection of renal artery stenosis with Doppler sonography before and after administration of captopril: Value of early systolic rise. Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170: 169-75
33. Goldberg BB, Liu JB, Forsberg F. Ultrasound contrast agents: a review. Ultrasound Med Biol 1994; 20: 319-33
34. Claudon M, Plouin PF, Baxter G, Rohban T, Maniez Devos D. A multicenter evaluation of the echo enhancing agent Levovist ® (SH508A) for color and spectral Doppler sonographic examination of the renal arteries in patients at risk of renal artery stenosis. Radiology 1999; in press
35. Burns PN, Powers JF, Simpson DH, Uhlendorf V, Fritzsch T. Harmonic imaging principles and preliminary results. Angiology 1996; 47: S63-74
36. Graubner T, Lazenby J, Nock LF, Von Behren PL, Kaiser WA. The detection of slow flow by non-linear ultrasound imaging of contrast agents using harmonic imaging and a new phase inversion technique in vitro (abstr). Radiology 1997: 205 (supp): 418
37. Brink JA, Lim JT, Wang Ge Heiken JP, Denyoe LA, Vannier MW. Technical optimization of spiral CT for depiction of renal artery stenosis: in vitro analysis. Radiology 1995; 194: 157-63
38. Galanski M, Prokop M, Chavan A, Schaefer CM, Jandeleit K, Nischelsky JE. Renal artery stenoses: spiral CT angiography. Radiology 1993; 189: 185-92
39. Rubin GD, Dake MD, Napel S et al. Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis: comparison of three-dimensional rendering techniques. Radiology 1994; 190: 181-9
40. Johnson PT, Halpern EJ, Kuszyk BS et al. Renal artery stenosis: CT angiography - comparison of real-time-rendering and maximum intensity projection algorithms. Radiology 1999; 211: 337-43
41. Van Hoe L, Vandermeulen D, Gryspeerdt S et al. Assessment of accuracy of renal artery stenosis grading in helical CT angiography using maximum intensity projections. Eur Radiol 1996; 6: 658-64
42. Beregi JP, Elkohen M, Deklunder G, Artaud D, Coullet JM, Wattinne L. Helical CT angiography compared with arteriography in the detection of renal artery stenosis. Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167: 495-501
43. Wittenberg G, Kenn W, Tschammler A, Sandstede J, Hahn D. Spiral CT angiography of renal arteries: comparison with angiography. Eur Radiol 1999; 9: 546-51
44. Kaatee R, de Beek FJA, Lange EE et al. Renal artery stenosis: Detection and quantification with spiral CT angiography versus optimized digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 1997; 205: 121-7
45. Kaatee R, Beek FJA, Verschuyl EJ et al. Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: ostial or truncal? Radiology 1996; 199: 637-40
46. Beregi JP, Louvegny S, Gautier C et al. Fibromuscular dysplasia of the renal arteries: Comparison of helical CT angiography and arteriography. Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172: 27-34
47. Debatin JF, Spritzer CE, Grist TM et al. Imaging of the renal arteries: value of MR angiography. Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157: 981-90
48. Richter CS, Krestin GP, Eichenberger AC, Schöpke W, Fuchs WA. Assessment of renal artery stenosis by phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography. Eur Radiol 1993; 3: 495-8
49. Loubeyre P, Revel D, Garcia P et al. Screening patients for renal artery stenosis: value of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Am J Roentgenol 1995; 162: 847-52
50. Fellner C, Strotzer M, Geissler A et al. Renal arteries: evaluation with optimized 2D and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1995; 196: 681-7
51. Borrello JA, Li D, Vesely TM, Vining EP, Brown JJ, Haacke HM. Renal arteries: Clinical comparison of three-dimensional time of flight MR angiographic sequences and radiographic angiography. Radiology 1995; 197: 793-9
52. Gedroye WMW, Neerhut P, Negus R et al. Magnetic resonance angiography of renal artery stenosis. Clin Radiol 1995; 50: 436-9
53. De Cobelli F, Mellone R, Salvioni M et al. Renal artery stenosis: Value of screening with three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography with a phased-array multicoil. Radiology 1996; 201: 697-703
54. De Haan MW, Kouwenhoven M, Thelissen GRP et al. Renovascular disease in patients with hypertension: detection with systolic and diastolic gating in three-dimensional, phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 1996; 198: 449-56
55. Loubeyre P, Trollict P, Cahen R, Grozel F, Labeeuw M, Tran Minh VA. MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: Value of the combination of three-dimensional time-of-flight and three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography sequences. Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167: 489-94
56. Wasser MN, Westenberg J, Van der Hulst VPM et al. Hemodynamic significance of renal artery stenosis: Digital subtraction angiography versus systolically gated three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 1997; 202: 333-8
57. Prince MR, Narasimhan DL, Stanley JC et al. Breath-hold Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 1995; 197: 785-92
58. Wilman AH, Riederer SJ, King RF, Debbins JP, Rossman PJ, Ehman RL. Fluoroscopically triggered contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with elliptical centric view order: application to the renal arteries. Radiology 1997; 205: 137-46
59. Snidow JJ, Johnson MS, Harris VJ et al. Three-dimensional Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for aortoiliac inflow assessment plus renal artery screening in a single breath hold. Radiology 1996; 198: 725-32
60. Rieumont MJ, Kaufman JA, Geller SC et al. Evaluation of renal artery stenosis with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169: 39-44
61. Hany TF, Debatin JF, Leung DA, Pfammatter T. Evaluation of the aortoiliac and renal arteries: Comparison of breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional catheter angiography. Radiology 1997; 204: 357-62
62. De Cobelli F, Vanzulli A, Sironi S et al. Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced versus three-dimensional, phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 1997; 205: 689-95
63. Tello R, Thomson KR, Witte D, Becker GJ, Tress BM. Standard dose Gd-DTPA dynamic MR of renal arteries. JMRI 1998; 8: 421-6
64. Bakker J, Beek FJA, Beutler JJ et al. Renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries: accuracy of detection and visualization with Gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography. Radiology 1998; 207; 497-504
65. Thornton J, O'Callaghan J, Walshe J, O'Brien E, Varghese JC, Lee MJ. Comparison of digital subtraction angiography with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. Eur Radiol 1999; 9: 930-4
66. Gilfeather M, Yoon HC, Siegelman ES et al. Renal artery stenosis: Evaluation with conventional angiography versus Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1999; 210: 367-72
67. Schoenberg SO, Bock M, Knopp MV et al. Renal arteries: Optimization of three-dimensional Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with bolus-timing-independent fast multiphase acquisition in a single breath hold. Radiology 1999; 211: 667-79
68. Erbsloh-Möller B, Dumas A, Roth D et al. Furosemide I-131-hippuran renography after angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition for the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension. Am J Med 1991; 90: 23-9
69. Mann SJ, Pickering, TG, Tan S et al. Captopril renography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis: accuracy and limitations. Am J Med 1991; 90: 30-40
70. Geyskes GC, deBruyn AJG. Captopril renography and the effect of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty on blood pressure in 94 patients with renal artery stenosis. Am J Hypertens 1991; 4: 685S-689S
71. Dondi M, Fanti S, De Fabritiis A et al. Prognostic value of captopril renal scintigraphy in rcnovascular hypertension. J Nucl Med 1992; 33: 2040-4
72. 99mTc-DTPA gamma camera renography in the detection of renovascular hypertension. Nucl Med Commun 1993; 14: 169-75
73. Fommei E, Ghione S, Hilson AJW et al. Captopril radionuclide test in renovascular hypertension: European multicenter study. In O'Reilly PH, Taylor A, Nally JV, eds. Radionuclides in Nephrourology, Vol 1. Blue Bell, PA: Field and Wood Medical Periodicals, Inc., 1994: 33-7
74. Taylor A, Nally J, Aurell M et al. Consensus report on ACE inhibitor renography for detecting renovascular hypertension. J Nucl Med 1996; 37: 1876-82
75. Grenier N, Trillaud H, Combe C, Douws C, Jeandot J, Gosse P. Diagnosis of renovascular hypertension with captopril-sensitized dynamic MR of the kidney: feasibility and comparison with scintigraphy. Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166: 835-43